From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Dong Fang Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] fs/ocfs2: use list_for_each_entry() instead of list_for_each() Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2013 14:26:18 -0400 Message-ID: <51F8054A.1030603@gmail.com> References: <1374931429-14062-1-git-send-email-yp.fangdong@gmail.com> <20130729074928.GB5053@mwanda> <20130729080606.GD5053@mwanda> <51F7E332.5010708@gmail.com> <51F748AA.4060706@oracle.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: ocfs2-devel@oss.oracle.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org To: Jeff Liu Return-path: Received: from mail-pb0-f46.google.com ([209.85.160.46]:65150 "EHLO mail-pb0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750711Ab3G3G1L (ORCPT ); Tue, 30 Jul 2013 02:27:11 -0400 In-Reply-To: <51F748AA.4060706@oracle.com> Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 07/30/2013 01:01 AM, Jeff Liu wrote: > Hi Dong, > > On 07/31/2013 12:00 AM, Dong Fang wrote: > >> On 07/29/2013 04:06 AM, Dan Carpenter wrote: >>> Oh. It appears that nothing changed between v1 and v2. Only the CC >>> list. >>> >>> It's probably that the list moderation on ocfs2-devel was confusing >>> for non-native English speakers the patch submitter thought his >>> patch was dropped. >>> >>> Also mailing lists should have a white list so that I don't get the >>> message every single time. >>> >>> regards, >>> dan carpenter >>> >> sorry about that, i just think i shoud send this patch to linux-fsdevel, >> but ./get_maintainer.pl didn't tell me > > It's better to send this patch to ocfs2-devel@oss.oracle.com only, as this > is a specific patch for OCFS2. > > Also, we tag OCFS2 kernel patch with "ocfs2" in subject line rather than "fs/ocfs2". > > Thanks, > -Jeff > thx, Jeff