From: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>
To: Jeff Liu <jeff.liu@oracle.com>
Cc: richard -rw- weinberger <richard.weinberger@gmail.com>,
"ocfs2-users@oss.oracle.com" <ocfs2-users@oss.oracle.com>,
linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Sunil Mushran <sunil.mushran@gmail.com>,
Mark Fasheh <mfasheh@suse.com>
Subject: Re: OCFS2: ocfs2_read_blocks:285 ERROR: block 532737 had the JBD bit set while I was in lock_buffer!
Date: Tue, 03 Sep 2013 08:42:37 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <522584DD.8070401@nod.at> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <522554D6.4070000@oracle.com>
Hi!
Am 03.09.2013 05:17, schrieb Jeff Liu:
> Hello,
>
> It seems like Sunil has fixed a similar issue against ocfs2-1.4
> several years ago:
> https://oss.oracle.com/git/?p=ocfs2-1.4.git;a=commitdiff_plain;h=2fd250839d0f5073af8d42e97f1db74beb621674;hp=e882faf84930431524f84598caea7d4e9a9529c5
> https://oss.oracle.com/git/?p=ocfs2-1.4.git;a=commitdiff_plain;h=eccff85213d4c2762f787d9e7cb1503042ba75b9;hp=edc147473ffd9c03790dc4502b893823f44a9ec4
>
> The old bug ticket for the discussion:
> https://oss.oracle.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1235
>
> This fix is specifically for ocfs2-1.4, but Mark once mentioned that
> the BUG() there can be removed if we have a good explanation for this
> sort of behavior, is it time to have it in mainline?
Hmm, not fun.
In my case I'm not using NFS or any other network filesystem.
The OCFS2 is also used in local mode (no cluster).
What really worries me is that this another proof that Oracles OCFS2 branch is out of sync with mainline.
- Are there more fixes pending?
- Why aren't you pushing things back to mainline?
Thanks,
//richard
> Thanks,
> -Jeff
> On 09/03/2013 04:32 AM, richard -rw- weinberger wrote:
>
>> Hi!
>>
>> Today one of my computers crashed with the following panic.
>> The machine is heavily using reflinks.
>> Looks like it managed to hit a CATCH_BH_JBD_RACES error check.
>>
>> <3>[37628.934461] (reflink,512,0):ocfs2_reflink_ioctl:4459 ERROR: status = -17
>> <3>[37628.943160] (kworker/u:2,809,1):ocfs2_read_blocks:285 ERROR:
>> block 532737 had the JBD bit set while I was in lock_buffer!
>> <4>[37628.943169] ------------[ cut here ]------------
>> <2>[37628.944464] kernel BUG at
>> /home/rw/work/ssworkstation/maker/_source/kernel/fs/ocfs2/buffer_head_io.c:286!
>> <4>[37628.945134] invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP
>> <4>[37628.945809] CPU 1
>> <4>[37628.945817] Pid: 809, comm: kworker/u:2 Not tainted 3.8.4+ #46
>> /
>> <4>[37628.947167] RIP: 0010:[<ffffffff8125afa0>] [<ffffffff8125afa0>]
>> ocfs2_read_blocks+0x410/0x610
>> <4>[37628.947880] RSP: 0018:ffff880234631908 EFLAGS: 00010292
>> <4>[37628.948593] RAX: 000000000000006d RBX: 0000000000000001 RCX:
>> 0000000000000067
>> <4>[37628.949317] RDX: 0000000000000048 RSI: 0000000000000046 RDI:
>> ffffffff8214c0dc
>> Oops#1 Part3
>> <4>[37628.950037] RBP: ffff880234631988 R08: 000000000000000a R09:
>> 000000000000d490
>> <4>[37628.950758] R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000004 R12:
>> 0000000000082101
>> <4>[37628.951477] R13: ffff880233147980 R14: 0000000000000000 R15:
>> ffff880216ca2208
>> <4>[37628.952201] FS: 0000000000000000(0000)
>> GS:ffff88023e280000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
>> <4>[37628.952936] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
>> <4>[37628.953669] CR2: 00007fe7ea29fc62 CR3: 0000000006c0b000 CR4:
>> 00000000000407e0
>> <4>[37628.954421] DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2:
>> 0000000000000000
>> <4>[37628.955176] DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000ffff0ff0 DR7:
>> 0000000000000400
>> <4>[37628.955925] Process kworker/u:2 (pid: 809, threadinfo
>> ffff880234630000, task ffff880234ba86e0)
>> <4>[37628.956689] Stack:
>> <4>[37628.957461] 0000000000082101 ffffea0008900880 ffff880234631948
>> 0000000000001000
>> <4>[37628.958250] 0000000000082102 0000000000082102 ffffffff81295eb0
>> 0000000000000000
>> Oops#1 Part2
>> <4>[37628.959044] ffff88023428c000 0000000100000000 0000000000000000
>> ffff8802346319f0
>> <4>[37628.959844] Call Trace:
>> <4>[37628.960639] [<ffffffff81295eb0>] ? ocfs2_read_refcount_block+0x50/0x50
>> <4>[37628.961453] [<ffffffff81295e8b>] ocfs2_read_refcount_block+0x2b/0x50
>> <4>[37628.962249] [<ffffffff81297417>] ocfs2_get_refcount_tree+0xa7/0x350
>> <4>[37628.963042] [<ffffffff8115c6d1>] ? __find_get_block+0xa1/0x1e0
>> <4>[37628.963835] [<ffffffff8129c5e8>] ocfs2_lock_refcount_tree+0x48/0x4f0
>> <4>[37628.964645] [<ffffffff8124fccb>] ocfs2_remove_btree_range+0xab/0xb30
>> <4>[37628.965452] [<ffffffff81253a99>] ocfs2_commit_truncate+0x139/0x550
>> <4>[37628.966247] [<ffffffff812844c0>] ? ocfs2_extend_trans+0x1c0/0x1c0
>> <4>[37628.967049] [<ffffffff8127e36e>] ocfs2_evict_inode+0x89e/0x2530
>> <4>[37628.967851] [<ffffffff81154a78>] ? __inode_wait_for_writeback+0x68/0xc0
>> <4>[37628.968645] [<ffffffff8114878f>] evict+0xaf/0x1b0
>> <4>[37628.969432] [<ffffffff81149495>] iput+0x105/0x1a0
>> Oops#1 Part1
>> <4>[37628.970213] [<ffffffff8125b557>] __ocfs2_drop_dl_inodes.isra.14+0x47/0x80
>> <4>[37628.971002] [<ffffffff8125bd65>] ocfs2_drop_dl_inodes+0x25/0xa0
>> <4>[37628.971788] [<ffffffff81087dc7>] process_one_work+0x147/0x470
>> <4>[37628.972580] [<ffffffff810884bd>] worker_thread+0x14d/0x3f0
>> <4>[37628.973381] [<ffffffff81088370>] ? rescuer_thread+0x240/0x240
>> <4>[37628.974175] [<ffffffff8108db5b>] kthread+0xbb/0xc0
>> <4>[37628.974960] [<ffffffff8108daa0>] ? __kthread_parkme+0x80/0x80
>> <4>[37628.975747] [<ffffffff817dd9ec>] ret_from_fork+0x7c/0xb0
>> <4>[37628.976529] [<ffffffff8108daa0>] ? __kthread_parkme+0x80/0x80
>> <4>[37628.977307] Code: 0f 0b 4c 89 ff e8 11 0b f0 ff e9 f2 fc ff ff
>> 48 b8 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 10 48 85 05 2b 58 9d 00 74 09 48 85 05 c2
>> 79 f4 00 74 02 <0f> 0b 65 48 8b 14 25 70 b8 00 00 48 8d 82 28 e0 ff ff
>> 4d 8b 67
>> <1>[37628.979053] RIP [<ffffffff8125afa0>] ocfs2_read_blocks+0x410/0x610
>> <4>[37628.979893] RSP <ffff880234631908>
>> <4>[37628.983420] ---[ end trace c03a48f44cf30d5e ]---
>>
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-09-03 6:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-09-02 20:32 OCFS2: ocfs2_read_blocks:285 ERROR: block 532737 had the JBD bit set while I was in lock_buffer! richard -rw- weinberger
2013-09-03 3:17 ` Jeff Liu
2013-09-03 6:42 ` Richard Weinberger [this message]
2013-09-03 8:08 ` Jeff Liu
2013-09-03 17:22 ` Mark Fasheh
2013-09-03 18:25 ` Richard Weinberger
2013-09-03 19:33 ` Mark Fasheh
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=522584DD.8070401@nod.at \
--to=richard@nod.at \
--cc=jeff.liu@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mfasheh@suse.com \
--cc=ocfs2-users@oss.oracle.com \
--cc=richard.weinberger@gmail.com \
--cc=sunil.mushran@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).