From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Marco Stornelli Subject: Re: [PATCH 12/19] pramfs: symlink operations Date: Sat, 07 Sep 2013 18:09:27 +0200 Message-ID: <522B4FB7.9050107@gmail.com> References: <522AE3DB.7000209@gmail.com> <20130907144118.GA13318@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Vladimir Davydov , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Linux FS Devel To: Al Viro Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20130907144118.GA13318@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org Il 07/09/2013 16:41, Al Viro ha scritto: > On Sat, Sep 07, 2013 at 10:29:15AM +0200, Marco Stornelli wrote: >> +static int pram_readlink(struct dentry *dentry, char __user *buffer, int buflen) >> +{ >> + struct inode *inode = dentry->d_inode; >> + struct super_block *sb = inode->i_sb; >> + u64 block; >> + char *blockp; >> + >> + block = pram_find_data_block(inode, 0); >> + blockp = pram_get_block(sb, block); >> + return vfs_readlink(dentry, buffer, buflen, blockp); >> +} > >> +static void *pram_follow_link(struct dentry *dentry, struct nameidata *nd) >> +{ >> + struct inode *inode = dentry->d_inode; >> + struct super_block *sb = inode->i_sb; >> + off_t block; >> + int status; >> + char *blockp; >> + >> + block = pram_find_data_block(inode, 0); >> + blockp = pram_get_block(sb, block); >> + status = vfs_follow_link(nd, blockp); >> + return ERR_PTR(status); >> +} > > Just nd_set_link(nd, blockp) instead of that vfs_follow_link() and be > done with that; that way you can use generic_readlink() instead of > pram_readlink() *and* get lower stack footprint on traversing them. > > Yep, you're right (as usual :)) Marco