From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Steve French Subject: Re: How to best return errors on follow_link Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 12:42:59 -0500 Message-ID: <524f69650905181042n79fd6dbdna57eb30d5fdeea0a@mail.gmail.com> References: <524f69650905181030x6206e818yadc45eaae288e4ef@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Cc: "linux-cifs-client@lists.samba.org" To: linux-fsdevel Return-path: Received: from mail-gx0-f166.google.com ([209.85.217.166]:34145 "EHLO mail-gx0-f166.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750955AbZERRm7 convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Mon, 18 May 2009 13:42:59 -0400 Received: by gxk10 with SMTP id 10so6523179gxk.13 for ; Mon, 18 May 2009 10:43:00 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <524f69650905181030x6206e818yadc45eaae288e4ef@mail.gmail.com> Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 12:30 PM, Steve French wro= te: > Jeff noticed a problem with the error handling in cifs_follow_link > that brought up a question about how follow_link is supposed to be > handling errors. =A0His change has a sideeffect of now > Is it ok to return errors on follow_link - seems strange to return > them indicectly via set_link? Sorry about the typo indecently was supposed to be "indirectly" (return errors on set_link) :) --=20 Thanks, Steve -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel= " in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html