From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Subject: Re: Revert 9745cdb36da83aeec198650b410ca06304cf792 ("select: use
 freezable blocking call")?
Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2013 22:22:22 +0100
Message-ID: <5270270E.10905@intel.com>
References: <1383075705.22833.18.camel@x220.thuisdomein>	 <52702170.7080003@intel.com> <1383081359.22833.21.camel@x220.thuisdomein>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: Colin Cross <ccross@android.com>,
	Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
	Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
To: Paul Bolle <pebolle@tiscali.nl>
Return-path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <1383081359.22833.21.camel@x220.thuisdomein>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org

On 10/29/2013 10:15 PM, Paul Bolle wrote:
> On Tue, 2013-10-29 at 21:58 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>> On 10/29/2013 8:41 PM, Paul Bolle wrote:
>>> 4) Should this commit be reverted? Or is there a better fix?
>> In short, yes, it should.
>>
>> I've already queued up a revert of something very similar and I'm going
>> to revert this one too.
> If you do, the revert should go into stable for v3.11+ too, shouldn't
> it?

I'll ask stable to pick it up later (or you can do that too).

Thanks,
Rafael