From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Richard Weinberger Subject: Re: [HACK] fs/super.c: sync ro remount after blocking writers Date: Fri, 31 Jan 2014 09:20:30 +0100 Message-ID: <52EB5CCE.5080609@nod.at> References: <1391095614-21554-1-git-send-email-andrew.ruder@elecsyscorp.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Artem Bityutskiy , Christoph Hellwig , Alexander Viro To: Andrew Ruder , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org Return-path: Received: from b.ns.miles-group.at ([95.130.255.144]:1660 "EHLO radon.swed.at" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932188AbaAaIUj (ORCPT ); Fri, 31 Jan 2014 03:20:39 -0500 In-Reply-To: <1391095614-21554-1-git-send-email-andrew.ruder@elecsyscorp.com> Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Am 30.01.2014 16:26, schrieb Andrew Ruder: > Move sync_filesystem() after sb_prepare_remount_readonly(). If writers > sneak in anywhere from sync_filesystem() to sb_prepare_remount_readonly() > it can cause inodes to be dirtied and writeback to occur well after > sys_mount() has completely successfully. > > This was spotted by corrupted ubifs filesystems on reboot, but appears > that it can cause issues with any filesystem using writeback. Link to original report: http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-mtd/2014-January/051651.html What we see is that writeback still happens after mounting the fs ro. Thanks, //richard