linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sougata santra <sougata@tuxera.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Vyacheslav Dubeyko <slava@dubeyko.com>,
	Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>,
	Alexey Khoroshilov <khoroshilov@ispras.ru>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] hfsplus: fix concurrent acess of alloc_blocks
Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2014 11:53:18 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <53047F0E.7040705@tuxera.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140218140642.fdc6a406f22de69bdf73e66e@linux-foundation.org>

On 02/19/2014 12:06 AM, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Mon, 17 Feb 2014 14:20:47 +0200 Sougata Santra <sougata@tuxera.com> wrote:
>
>>
>> Concurrent access to alloc_blocks in hfsplus_inode_info is
>> protected by extents_lock mutex. This patch fixes two
>> instances where alloc_blocks modification was not protected
>> with this lock. This fixes possible allocation bitmap
>> corruption in race conditions while extending and truncating
>> files.
>>
>> ...
>>
>> --- a/fs/hfsplus/extents.c
>> +++ b/fs/hfsplus/extents.c
>> @@ -498,11 +498,13 @@ int hfsplus_file_extend(struct inode *inode)
>>   			goto insert_extent;
>>   	}
>>   out:
>> -	mutex_unlock(&hip->extents_lock);
>>   	if (!res) {
>>   		hip->alloc_blocks += len;
>> +		mutex_unlock(&hip->extents_lock);
>>   		hfsplus_mark_inode_dirty(inode, HFSPLUS_I_ALLOC_DIRTY);
>> +		return 0;
>>   	}
>> +	mutex_unlock(&hip->extents_lock);
>>   	return res;
>>
>
> This looks OK.
>
>> @@ -592,9 +594,9 @@ void hfsplus_file_truncate(struct inode *inode)
>>   		hfs_brec_remove(&fd);
>>   	}
>>   	hfs_find_exit(&fd);
>> -	mutex_unlock(&hip->extents_lock);
>>
>>   	hip->alloc_blocks = blk_cnt;
>> +	mutex_unlock(&hip->extents_lock);
>>   out:
>>   	hip->phys_size = inode->i_size;
>>   	hip->fs_blocks = (inode->i_size + sb->s_blocksize - 1) >>
>
> But this does not.  To provide locking for
> hfsplus_inode_info.alloc_blocks, we must take the lock *before* taking
> a local copy of ->alloc_blocks.
>
> Please review:
>
> --- a/fs/hfsplus/extents.c~hfsplus-fix-concurrent-acess-of-alloc_blocks-fix
> +++ a/fs/hfsplus/extents.c
> @@ -556,11 +556,13 @@ void hfsplus_file_truncate(struct inode
>
>   	blk_cnt = (inode->i_size + HFSPLUS_SB(sb)->alloc_blksz - 1) >>
>   			HFSPLUS_SB(sb)->alloc_blksz_shift;
> +
> +	mutex_lock(&hip->extents_lock);
> +
>   	alloc_cnt = hip->alloc_blocks;
>   	if (blk_cnt == alloc_cnt)
> -		goto out;
> +		goto out_unlock;
>
> -	mutex_lock(&hip->extents_lock);
>   	res = hfs_find_init(HFSPLUS_SB(sb)->ext_tree, &fd);
>   	if (res) {
>   		mutex_unlock(&hip->extents_lock);
> @@ -594,6 +596,7 @@ void hfsplus_file_truncate(struct inode
>   	hfs_find_exit(&fd);
>
>   	hip->alloc_blocks = blk_cnt;
> +out_unlock:
>   	mutex_unlock(&hip->extents_lock);
>   out:
We can also remove this label ?
>   	hip->phys_size = inode->i_size;
> _
>


      parent reply	other threads:[~2014-02-19  9:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-02-17 12:20 [PATCH] hfsplus: fix concurrent acess of alloc_blocks Sougata Santra
2014-02-18 22:06 ` Andrew Morton
2014-02-19  9:36   ` Sougata Santra
2014-02-19  9:53   ` sougata santra [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=53047F0E.7040705@tuxera.com \
    --to=sougata@tuxera.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=joe@perches.com \
    --cc=khoroshilov@ispras.ru \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=slava@dubeyko.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).