From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Masayoshi Mizuma Subject: Re: xfs: processes are stuck at xlog_grant_head_wait() Date: Mon, 12 May 2014 19:13:55 +0900 Message-ID: <53709EE3.5090407@jp.fujitsu.com> References: <53708354.2060103@jp.fujitsu.com> <20140512082748.GX5421@dastard> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: , , To: Dave Chinner Return-path: Received: from fgwmail5.fujitsu.co.jp ([192.51.44.35]:55885 "EHLO fgwmail5.fujitsu.co.jp" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754428AbaELKO6 (ORCPT ); Mon, 12 May 2014 06:14:58 -0400 Received: from m2.gw.fujitsu.co.jp (unknown [10.0.50.72]) by fgwmail5.fujitsu.co.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF7E63EE1A8 for ; Mon, 12 May 2014 19:14:56 +0900 (JST) Received: from smail (m2 [127.0.0.1]) by outgoing.m2.gw.fujitsu.co.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF66945DE93 for ; Mon, 12 May 2014 19:14:56 +0900 (JST) Received: from s2.gw.fujitsu.co.jp (s2.gw.nic.fujitsu.com [10.0.50.92]) by m2.gw.fujitsu.co.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 984C645DE95 for ; Mon, 12 May 2014 19:14:56 +0900 (JST) Received: from s2.gw.fujitsu.co.jp (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by s2.gw.fujitsu.co.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8CA2B1DB803C for ; Mon, 12 May 2014 19:14:56 +0900 (JST) Received: from g01jpfmpwkw02.exch.g01.fujitsu.local (g01jpfmpwkw02.exch.g01.fujitsu.local [10.0.193.56]) by s2.gw.fujitsu.co.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3FF561DB803A for ; Mon, 12 May 2014 19:14:56 +0900 (JST) In-Reply-To: <20140512082748.GX5421@dastard> Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Hi Dave, On Mon, 12 May 2014 18:27:48 +1000 Dave Chinner wrote: > On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 05:16:20PM +0900, Masayoshi Mizuma wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> Processes are stuck at xlog_grant_head_wait() when I ran a heavy stress >> test (xfstests, ltpstress and fsstress concurrently) on linux-next >> (3.15.0-rc4-next-20140506) kernel. >> I got the crash dump, then I think this problem is similar as a problem >> fixed by the following commit. > > Already fixed in the for-next branch. > > 49abc3a xfs: truncate_setsize should be outside transactions Oh good! thank you! Thanks, Masayoshi Mizuma > > Cheers, > > Dave. >