From: Eric Sandeen <esandeen@redhat.com>
To: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>, Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Cc: Mateusz Guzik <mguzik@redhat.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>, Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>,
Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 2/2] fs: print a message when freezing/unfreezing filesystems
Date: Wed, 14 May 2014 17:40:22 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5373F0D6.4090600@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140514223745.GF5421@dastard>
On 5/14/14, 5:37 PM, Dave Chinner wrote:
> On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 08:00:52AM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote:
>> On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 01:39:45PM +0200, Jan Kara wrote:
>>> On Wed 14-05-14 13:26:21, Mateusz Guzik wrote:
>>>> On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 01:14:49PM +0200, Jan Kara wrote:
>>>>> On Wed 14-05-14 00:04:43, Mateusz Guzik wrote:
>>>>>> This helps hang troubleshooting efforts when only dmesg is available.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> While here remove code duplication with MS_RDONLY case and fix a
>>>>>> whitespace nit.
>>>>> I'm somewhat undecided here I have to say. On one hand I don't like
>>>>> printing to kernel log when everything is fine and kernel is operating
>>>>> normally. On the other hand I've seen quite a few cases where people have
>>>>> shot themselves in the foot with filesystem freezing so having some trace
>>>>> of this in the log doesn't seem like a completely bad thing either. What do
>>>>> other people think?
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I would like to note that the kernel already prints messages when e.g.
>>>> filesystems get mounted.
>>> Yeah, that's a fair point.
>>
>> But filesystems choose to output that info, not the VFS. When you do
>> a remount,ro there is no output in syslog, because filesystems don't
>> need to dump any output - the state change is reflected in
>> /proc/self/mounts. IMO frozen should state should be communicated
>> the same way so that it is silent when it just works, and the state
>> can easily be determined when something goes wrong.
>
> Say, like this:
>
> $ grep /mnt/test /proc/mounts
> /dev/vda /mnt/test xfs rw,relatime,attr2,inode64,noquota 0 0
> $ sudo xfs_freeze -f /mnt/test
> $ grep /mnt/test /proc/mounts
> /dev/vda /mnt/test xfs rw,frozen,relatime,attr2,inode64,noquota 0 0
> $ sudo xfs_freeze -u /mnt/test
> $ grep /mnt/test /proc/mounts
> /dev/vda /mnt/test xfs rw,relatime,attr2,inode64,noquota 0 0
> $
I'm not totally convinced that including a non-mount option in what
has always (?) been a list of mount options is a great idea.
(Granted, some options there are defaults, and weren't actually specified
as a mount option, but if they had been, they'd have been accepted).
Maybe add a "mount -o remount,frozen" handler ? ;)
-Eric
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-05-14 22:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-05-13 22:04 [PATCH V2 1/2] fs: include device name in error messages about freezing Mateusz Guzik
2014-05-13 22:04 ` [PATCH V2 2/2] fs: print a message when freezing/unfreezing filesystems Mateusz Guzik
2014-05-14 11:14 ` Jan Kara
2014-05-14 11:26 ` Mateusz Guzik
2014-05-14 11:39 ` Jan Kara
2014-05-14 22:00 ` Dave Chinner
2014-05-14 22:37 ` Dave Chinner
2014-05-14 22:40 ` Eric Sandeen [this message]
2014-05-15 10:40 ` Lukáš Czerner
2014-05-15 10:47 ` Mateusz Guzik
2014-05-15 22:21 ` Dave Chinner
2014-05-15 22:34 ` Mateusz Guzik
2014-05-15 22:51 ` Dave Chinner
2014-05-15 23:19 ` Mateusz Guzik
2014-05-16 0:11 ` Dave Chinner
2014-05-16 0:39 ` Mateusz Guzik
2014-05-19 9:43 ` Jan Kara
2014-05-19 23:37 ` Dave Chinner
2014-05-15 10:13 ` Jan Kara
2014-05-15 22:16 ` Dave Chinner
2014-05-14 11:58 ` Lukáš Czerner
2014-05-14 11:10 ` [PATCH V2 1/2] fs: include device name in error messages about freezing Jan Kara
2014-05-14 22:07 ` Dave Chinner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5373F0D6.4090600@redhat.com \
--to=esandeen@redhat.com \
--cc=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=jbacik@fb.com \
--cc=joe@perches.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mguzik@redhat.com \
--cc=sandeen@redhat.com \
--cc=viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).