From: Boaz Harrosh <openosd@gmail.com>
To: Paul Bolle <pebolle@tiscali.nl>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>, Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>,
pramod.gurav.etc@gmail.com, Jason Cooper <jason@lakedaemon.net>,
Markus Mayer <markus.mayer@linaro.org>,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: direct-io: squelch maybe-uninitialized warning in do_direct_IO()
Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2014 12:40:44 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <53C79A1C.5060402@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <53C79949.7010201@gmail.com>
On 07/17/2014 12:37 PM, Boaz Harrosh wrote:
> From: Paul Bolle <pebolle@tiscali.nl>
>
> The following warnings:
>
> fs/direct-io.c: In function ‘__blockdev_direct_IO’:
> fs/direct-io.c:1011:12: warning: ‘to’ may be used uninitialized in this function [-Wmaybe-uninitialized]
> fs/direct-io.c:913:16: note: ‘to’ was declared here
> fs/direct-io.c:1011:12: warning: ‘from’ may be used uninitialized in this function [-Wmaybe-uninitialized]
> fs/direct-io.c:913:10: note: ‘from’ was declared here
>
> are false positive because dio_get_page() either fails, or sets both
> 'from' and 'to'.
>
> Maybe it's better to move initializing "to" and "from" out of
> dio_get_page(). That _might_ make it easier for both the the reader and
> the compiler to understand what's going on. Something like this:
>
> Christoph Hellwig said ...
> The fix of moving the code defintively looks nicer, while I think
> uninitialized_var is horrible wart that won't get anywhere near my code.
>
> Boaz Harrosh I agree with Christoph and Paul
>
So Here, everyone likes this one (I think) please ACK/Review and let us merge
it.
> Signed-off-by: Paul Bolle <pebolle@tiscali.nl>
Paul this is your patch I put you as Signed-off-by please acknowledge
> Signed-off-by: Boaz Harrosh <boaz@plexistor.com>
Thanks
Boaz
> ---
> fs/direct-io.c | 14 +++++++-------
> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/direct-io.c b/fs/direct-io.c
> index 98040ba..2f024fc 100644
> --- a/fs/direct-io.c
> +++ b/fs/direct-io.c
> @@ -198,9 +198,8 @@ static inline int dio_refill_pages(struct dio *dio, struct dio_submit *sdio)
> * L1 cache.
> */
> static inline struct page *dio_get_page(struct dio *dio,
> - struct dio_submit *sdio, size_t *from, size_t *to)
> + struct dio_submit *sdio)
> {
> - int n;
> if (dio_pages_present(sdio) == 0) {
> int ret;
>
> @@ -209,10 +208,7 @@ static inline struct page *dio_get_page(struct dio *dio,
> return ERR_PTR(ret);
> BUG_ON(dio_pages_present(sdio) == 0);
> }
> - n = sdio->head++;
> - *from = n ? 0 : sdio->from;
> - *to = (n == sdio->tail - 1) ? sdio->to : PAGE_SIZE;
> - return dio->pages[n];
> + return dio->pages[sdio->head];
> }
>
> /**
> @@ -911,11 +907,15 @@ static int do_direct_IO(struct dio *dio, struct dio_submit *sdio,
> while (sdio->block_in_file < sdio->final_block_in_request) {
> struct page *page;
> size_t from, to;
> - page = dio_get_page(dio, sdio, &from, &to);
> +
> + page = dio_get_page(dio, sdio);
> if (IS_ERR(page)) {
> ret = PTR_ERR(page);
> goto out;
> }
> + from = sdio->head ? 0 : sdio->from;
> + to = (sdio->head == sdio->tail - 1) ? sdio->to : PAGE_SIZE;
> + sdio->head++;
>
> while (from < to) {
> unsigned this_chunk_bytes; /* # of bytes mapped */
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-07-17 9:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-07-04 5:43 [PATCH] fs/direct-io.c: Fix compilation warning for uninitialized variables pramod.gurav.etc
2014-07-13 11:50 ` Christoph Hellwig
2014-07-14 7:04 ` pramod gurav
2014-07-16 17:08 ` Boaz Harrosh
2014-07-16 17:56 ` Jason Cooper
2014-07-16 17:58 ` Christoph Hellwig
2014-07-16 18:42 ` Paul Bolle
2014-07-17 9:37 ` direct-io: squelch maybe-uninitialized warning in do_direct_IO() Boaz Harrosh
2014-07-17 9:40 ` Boaz Harrosh [this message]
2014-07-17 9:54 ` Paul Bolle
2014-07-17 9:48 ` Paul Bolle
2014-07-17 11:00 ` Boaz Harrosh
2014-07-17 11:11 ` [PATCH v2] " Boaz Harrosh
2014-07-17 11:29 ` Paul Bolle
2014-07-20 9:09 ` [PATCH v3] direct-io: fix uninitialized " Boaz Harrosh
2014-07-21 11:36 ` Christoph Hellwig
2014-07-22 9:03 ` Boaz Harrosh
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=53C79A1C.5060402@gmail.com \
--to=openosd@gmail.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=jason@lakedaemon.net \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=markus.mayer@linaro.org \
--cc=pebolle@tiscali.nl \
--cc=pramod.gurav.etc@gmail.com \
--cc=sam@ravnborg.org \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).