linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Boaz Harrosh <boaz@plexistor.com>
To: Matthew Wilcox <willy@linux.intel.com>, Boaz Harrosh <openosd@gmail.com>
Cc: Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com>,
	linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Sagi Manole <sagi@plexistor.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/9 v2] SQUASHME: prd: Last fixes for partitions
Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2014 12:55:56 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <53FDAB2C.7030105@plexistor.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140827043819.GD3285@linux.intel.com>

On 08/27/2014 07:38 AM, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 08:36:19PM +0300, Boaz Harrosh wrote:
>> It is getting late around here and I will not be pushing new trees
>> tonight, first thing tomorrow morning. (Your last push caused me lots
>> of extra work, you must not do like you did when working on a rebasing
>> out-off-tree project involving more then one person, but more on the proper
>> procedure tomorrow with the push of the trees)
> 
> If you're going to push a new tree, please do so on top of the DAX
> v10 patches I just sent out.  

Matthew hi

No, I'm pushing 4 brd patches for mainline for inclusion today, into
current 3.17-rcX cycle. The set includes your one patch which is needed
out and before the DAX patches.

> If you have any changes you want to make
> to the bdev_direct_access() patch, then please make them separately,
> instead of editing my patch like you did last time.
> 

I apologize about that but I did use the proper protocol here.
I'm sending your patch as part of my push from my tree, through
Jens into linus. I have put my sign-off-by on the patch, then
Jens will put his, before it will finally be pushed to Linus.

Having my sign-off on it and pushing to Jens means I need to
review and approve the patch, and so I had to fix the checkpatch
complain before pushing. And I did put at the patch commit message
that I have edited for check-patch. And I have sent the mail directly
addressed to you for approval.

If I have offended you in any way please forgive me, none was intended,
opposite I have only the deepest gratitude and admiration, and I want
for these patches to be pushed forward.

Thanks
Boaz


  reply	other threads:[~2014-08-27  9:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-08-13 12:08 [RFC 0/9] pmem: Support for "struct page" with Persistent Memory storage Boaz Harrosh
2014-08-13 12:10 ` [RFC 1/9] prd: Initial version of Persistent RAM Driver Boaz Harrosh
2014-08-13 12:11 ` [RFC 2/9] prd: add support for rw_page() Boaz Harrosh
2014-08-13 12:12 ` [RFC 3/9] prd: Add getgeo to block ops Boaz Harrosh
2014-08-13 12:14 ` [RFC 4/9] SQUASHME: prd: Fixs to getgeo Boaz Harrosh
2014-08-20 22:10   ` Ross Zwisler
2014-08-21  9:47     ` Boaz Harrosh
2014-08-13 12:16 ` [RFC 5/9] SQUASHME: prd: Last fixes for partitions Boaz Harrosh
2014-08-14 13:04   ` Boaz Harrosh
2014-08-14 13:16     ` Matthew Wilcox
2014-08-14 13:55       ` Boaz Harrosh
2014-08-14 13:07   ` [PATCH 5/9 v2] " Boaz Harrosh
2014-08-25 20:10     ` Ross Zwisler
2014-08-26  8:18       ` Boaz Harrosh
2014-08-26 17:36         ` Boaz Harrosh
2014-08-26 20:34           ` Ross Zwisler
2014-08-27  9:41             ` Boaz Harrosh
2014-08-27  4:38           ` Matthew Wilcox
2014-08-27  9:55             ` Boaz Harrosh [this message]
2014-08-27 12:46               ` Matthew Wilcox
2014-08-27 13:01                 ` Boaz Harrosh
2014-08-20 23:03   ` [RFC 5/9] " Ross Zwisler
2014-08-21 10:05     ` Boaz Harrosh
2014-08-13 12:18 ` [RFC 6/9] SQUASHME: prd: Let each prd-device manage private memory region Boaz Harrosh
2014-08-21 16:57   ` Ross Zwisler
2014-08-13 12:20 ` [RFC 7/9] SQUASHME: prd: Support of multiple memory regions Boaz Harrosh
2014-08-25 23:02   ` Ross Zwisler
2014-08-13 12:21 ` [RFC 8/9] mm: export sparse_add/remove_one_section Boaz Harrosh
2014-08-13 12:26 ` [RFC 9/9] prd: Add support for page struct mapping Boaz Harrosh
2014-08-15 20:28   ` Toshi Kani
2014-08-17  9:17     ` Boaz Harrosh
2014-08-18 19:48       ` Toshi Kani
2014-08-19  8:40         ` Boaz Harrosh
2014-08-19 16:49           ` Toshi Kani
2014-08-22 14:36   ` Dave Hansen
2014-09-09 16:16     ` Boaz Harrosh
2014-09-09 16:29       ` Dave Hansen
2014-08-20 20:13 ` [RFC 0/9] pmem: Support for "struct page" with Persistent Memory storage Ross Zwisler

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=53FDAB2C.7030105@plexistor.com \
    --to=boaz@plexistor.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=openosd@gmail.com \
    --cc=ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=sagi@plexistor.com \
    --cc=willy@linux.intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).