From: Boaz Harrosh <boaz@plexistor.com>
To: Matthew Wilcox <willy@linux.intel.com>, Boaz Harrosh <openosd@gmail.com>
Cc: Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com>,
linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Sagi Manole <sagi@plexistor.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/9 v2] SQUASHME: prd: Last fixes for partitions
Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2014 12:55:56 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <53FDAB2C.7030105@plexistor.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140827043819.GD3285@linux.intel.com>
On 08/27/2014 07:38 AM, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 08:36:19PM +0300, Boaz Harrosh wrote:
>> It is getting late around here and I will not be pushing new trees
>> tonight, first thing tomorrow morning. (Your last push caused me lots
>> of extra work, you must not do like you did when working on a rebasing
>> out-off-tree project involving more then one person, but more on the proper
>> procedure tomorrow with the push of the trees)
>
> If you're going to push a new tree, please do so on top of the DAX
> v10 patches I just sent out.
Matthew hi
No, I'm pushing 4 brd patches for mainline for inclusion today, into
current 3.17-rcX cycle. The set includes your one patch which is needed
out and before the DAX patches.
> If you have any changes you want to make
> to the bdev_direct_access() patch, then please make them separately,
> instead of editing my patch like you did last time.
>
I apologize about that but I did use the proper protocol here.
I'm sending your patch as part of my push from my tree, through
Jens into linus. I have put my sign-off-by on the patch, then
Jens will put his, before it will finally be pushed to Linus.
Having my sign-off on it and pushing to Jens means I need to
review and approve the patch, and so I had to fix the checkpatch
complain before pushing. And I did put at the patch commit message
that I have edited for check-patch. And I have sent the mail directly
addressed to you for approval.
If I have offended you in any way please forgive me, none was intended,
opposite I have only the deepest gratitude and admiration, and I want
for these patches to be pushed forward.
Thanks
Boaz
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-08-27 9:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-08-13 12:08 [RFC 0/9] pmem: Support for "struct page" with Persistent Memory storage Boaz Harrosh
2014-08-13 12:10 ` [RFC 1/9] prd: Initial version of Persistent RAM Driver Boaz Harrosh
2014-08-13 12:11 ` [RFC 2/9] prd: add support for rw_page() Boaz Harrosh
2014-08-13 12:12 ` [RFC 3/9] prd: Add getgeo to block ops Boaz Harrosh
2014-08-13 12:14 ` [RFC 4/9] SQUASHME: prd: Fixs to getgeo Boaz Harrosh
2014-08-20 22:10 ` Ross Zwisler
2014-08-21 9:47 ` Boaz Harrosh
2014-08-13 12:16 ` [RFC 5/9] SQUASHME: prd: Last fixes for partitions Boaz Harrosh
2014-08-14 13:04 ` Boaz Harrosh
2014-08-14 13:16 ` Matthew Wilcox
2014-08-14 13:55 ` Boaz Harrosh
2014-08-14 13:07 ` [PATCH 5/9 v2] " Boaz Harrosh
2014-08-25 20:10 ` Ross Zwisler
2014-08-26 8:18 ` Boaz Harrosh
2014-08-26 17:36 ` Boaz Harrosh
2014-08-26 20:34 ` Ross Zwisler
2014-08-27 9:41 ` Boaz Harrosh
2014-08-27 4:38 ` Matthew Wilcox
2014-08-27 9:55 ` Boaz Harrosh [this message]
2014-08-27 12:46 ` Matthew Wilcox
2014-08-27 13:01 ` Boaz Harrosh
2014-08-20 23:03 ` [RFC 5/9] " Ross Zwisler
2014-08-21 10:05 ` Boaz Harrosh
2014-08-13 12:18 ` [RFC 6/9] SQUASHME: prd: Let each prd-device manage private memory region Boaz Harrosh
2014-08-21 16:57 ` Ross Zwisler
2014-08-13 12:20 ` [RFC 7/9] SQUASHME: prd: Support of multiple memory regions Boaz Harrosh
2014-08-25 23:02 ` Ross Zwisler
2014-08-13 12:21 ` [RFC 8/9] mm: export sparse_add/remove_one_section Boaz Harrosh
2014-08-13 12:26 ` [RFC 9/9] prd: Add support for page struct mapping Boaz Harrosh
2014-08-15 20:28 ` Toshi Kani
2014-08-17 9:17 ` Boaz Harrosh
2014-08-18 19:48 ` Toshi Kani
2014-08-19 8:40 ` Boaz Harrosh
2014-08-19 16:49 ` Toshi Kani
2014-08-22 14:36 ` Dave Hansen
2014-09-09 16:16 ` Boaz Harrosh
2014-09-09 16:29 ` Dave Hansen
2014-08-20 20:13 ` [RFC 0/9] pmem: Support for "struct page" with Persistent Memory storage Ross Zwisler
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=53FDAB2C.7030105@plexistor.com \
--to=boaz@plexistor.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=openosd@gmail.com \
--cc=ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com \
--cc=sagi@plexistor.com \
--cc=willy@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).