From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Boaz Harrosh Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/9 v2] SQUASHME: prd: Last fixes for partitions Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2014 12:55:56 +0300 Message-ID: <53FDAB2C.7030105@plexistor.com> References: <53EB5536.8020702@gmail.com> <53EB5709.4090401@plexistor.com> <53ECB480.4060104@plexistor.com> <1408997403.17731.7.camel@rzwisler-mobl1.amr.corp.intel.com> <53FC42C5.6040300@plexistor.com> <53FCC593.6020201@gmail.com> <20140827043819.GD3285@linux.intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Ross Zwisler , linux-fsdevel , Andrew Morton , Sagi Manole To: Matthew Wilcox , Boaz Harrosh Return-path: Received: from mail-we0-f172.google.com ([74.125.82.172]:61104 "EHLO mail-we0-f172.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932914AbaH0J4A (ORCPT ); Wed, 27 Aug 2014 05:56:00 -0400 Received: by mail-we0-f172.google.com with SMTP id x48so16033608wes.31 for ; Wed, 27 Aug 2014 02:55:58 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20140827043819.GD3285@linux.intel.com> Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 08/27/2014 07:38 AM, Matthew Wilcox wrote: > On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 08:36:19PM +0300, Boaz Harrosh wrote: >> It is getting late around here and I will not be pushing new trees >> tonight, first thing tomorrow morning. (Your last push caused me lots >> of extra work, you must not do like you did when working on a rebasing >> out-off-tree project involving more then one person, but more on the proper >> procedure tomorrow with the push of the trees) > > If you're going to push a new tree, please do so on top of the DAX > v10 patches I just sent out. Matthew hi No, I'm pushing 4 brd patches for mainline for inclusion today, into current 3.17-rcX cycle. The set includes your one patch which is needed out and before the DAX patches. > If you have any changes you want to make > to the bdev_direct_access() patch, then please make them separately, > instead of editing my patch like you did last time. > I apologize about that but I did use the proper protocol here. I'm sending your patch as part of my push from my tree, through Jens into linus. I have put my sign-off-by on the patch, then Jens will put his, before it will finally be pushed to Linus. Having my sign-off on it and pushing to Jens means I need to review and approve the patch, and so I had to fix the checkpatch complain before pushing. And I did put at the patch commit message that I have edited for check-patch. And I have sent the mail directly addressed to you for approval. If I have offended you in any way please forgive me, none was intended, opposite I have only the deepest gratitude and admiration, and I want for these patches to be pushed forward. Thanks Boaz