From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Gu Zheng Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] f2fs: fix missing kmem_cache_free Date: Fri, 5 Dec 2014 11:34:49 +0800 Message-ID: <548127D9.4030007@cn.fujitsu.com> References: <1417740583-1681-1-git-send-email-jaegeuk@kernel.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: , , To: Jaegeuk Kim Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1417740583-1681-1-git-send-email-jaegeuk@kernel.org> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org Hi Jaegeuk, On 12/05/2014 08:49 AM, Jaegeuk Kim wrote: > This patch fixes missing kmem_cache_free when handling errors. > > Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim > --- > fs/f2fs/node.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/fs/f2fs/node.c b/fs/f2fs/node.c > index b1466cf..c59341d 100644 > --- a/fs/f2fs/node.c > +++ b/fs/f2fs/node.c > @@ -158,7 +158,7 @@ retry: > head->entry_cnt = 0; > > if (radix_tree_insert(&nm_i->nat_set_root, set, head)) { > - cond_resched(); > + kmem_cache_free(nat_entry_set_slab, head); Why not reuse the allocated entry? This routine is under nat_tree_lock, so the free_old->research->alloc_new is needless, because no other ones can race with us. > goto retry; And radix_tree_insert can only fail -ENOMEM here, IMO, the in-time retry step makes very little sense here. How about retaining the "cond_resched()" and retry insert later? If I misread something, please correct me.:) Thanks, Gu > } > }