From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Andreas Gruenbacher <agruenba@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [Lsf-pc] [LSF/MM ATTEND] Richacls
Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2015 08:57:13 +0100
Message-ID: <54B62159.8030807@redhat.com>
References: <1626890778.1513173.1421087867777.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com> <1137663039.1544780.1421096804147.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com> <20150112223016.GB1940@fieldses.org> <20150113101435.GA28924@quack.suse.cz> <54B534C3.3090608@redhat.com> <20150113164802.GA5830@samba2> <54B5548E.5030808@redhat.com> <20150113174029.GA4156@fieldses.org> <20150113180458.GF5830@samba2> <017d01d02f6a$a2e9e220$e8bda660$@mindspring.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: "'Jan Kara'" <jack@suse.cz>, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
	lsf-pc@lists.linux-foundation.org
To: Frank Filz <ffilzlnx@mindspring.com>,
	"'Jeremy Allison'" <jra@samba.org>,
	"'J. Bruce Fields'" <bfields@fieldses.org>
Return-path: <linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:37983 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1754238AbbANH5b (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Wed, 14 Jan 2015 02:57:31 -0500
In-Reply-To: <017d01d02f6a$a2e9e220$e8bda660$@mindspring.com>
Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org>

On 01/13/2015 08:53 PM, Frank Filz wrote:
>> On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 12:40:29PM -0500, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
>>> On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 06:23:26PM +0100, Andreas Gruenbacher wrote:
>>>> On of the differences is that permissions in POSIX ACLs do
>>>> accumulate, while in NFSv4 and CIFS ACLs, and therefore also
>>>> richacls, they do not. So the two models are really not
>>>> interchangeable, however annoying that may be.
>
> I think Andreas got do and do not reversed (though looks like everyone read
> it the right way...)

Yes, sorry.

Andreas