linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Boaz Harrosh <boaz@plexistor.com>
To: Matthew Wilcox <willy@linux.intel.com>, Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org,
	axboe@kernel.dk, linux-nvdimm@ml01.01.org,
	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
	linux-raid@vger.kernel.org, mgorman@suse.de, hch@infradead.org,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
	"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/7] evacuate struct page from the block layer
Date: Sun, 22 Mar 2015 18:24:50 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <550EECD2.4000604@plexistor.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150320203136.GM4003@linux.intel.com>

On 03/20/2015 10:31 PM, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
<>
> 
> There's a lot of code out there that relies on struct page being PAGE_SIZE
> bytes.  

Not so much really. Not at the lower end of the stack. You can actually feed
a 
	vp = kmalloc(64K);
	bv_page = virt_to_page(vp)
	bv_len = 64k

And feed that to an hard drive. It works.

The only last stronghold of PAGE_SIZE is at the page-cache and page-fault
granularity where the minimum is the better. But it should not be hard
to clean up the lower end of the stack. Even introduce a:
	page_size(page)

You will find that every subsystem that can work with a sub-page size
similar to above bv_len. Will also work well with bigger than PAGE_SIZE
bv_len equivalent.

Only the BUG_ONs need to convert to page_size(page) instead of PAGE_SIZE

> I'm cool with replacing 'struct page' with 'struct superpage'
> [1] in the biovec and auditing all of the code which touches it ... but
> that's going to be a lot of code!  I'm not sure it's less code than
> going directly to 'just do I/O on PFNs'.
> 

struct page already knows how to be a super-page. with the THP mechanics.
All a page_size(page) needs is a call to its section, we do not need any
added storage at page-struct. (And we can cache this as a flag we actually
already have a flag)

It looks like you are very trigger happy to change
	"biovec and auditing all of the code which touches it"

I believe long long term your #1b is the correct "full audit" path:

	Page Is the virtual-2-page-2-physical descriptor + state.
	It is variable size
 
> [1] Please, somebody come up with a better name!

sure struct page *page.

The one to kill is PAGE_SIZE. In most current code it can just be MIN_PAGE_SIZE
and CACHE_PAGE_SIZE == MIN_PAGE_SIZE. Only novelty is enhance of the split_huge_page
in the case of "page-fault-granularity".

Thanks
Boaz


  parent reply	other threads:[~2015-03-22 16:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-03-16 20:25 [RFC PATCH 0/7] evacuate struct page from the block layer Dan Williams
2015-03-16 20:25 ` [RFC PATCH 1/7] block: add helpers for accessing a bio_vec page Dan Williams
2015-03-16 20:25 ` [RFC PATCH 2/7] block: convert bio_vec.bv_page to bv_pfn Dan Williams
2015-03-16 23:05   ` Al Viro
2015-03-17 13:02     ` Matthew Wilcox
2015-03-17 15:53       ` Dan Williams
2015-03-16 20:25 ` [RFC PATCH 3/7] dma-mapping: allow archs to optionally specify a ->map_pfn() operation Dan Williams
2015-03-18 11:21   ` [Linux-nvdimm] " Boaz Harrosh
2015-03-16 20:25 ` [RFC PATCH 4/7] scatterlist: use sg_phys() Dan Williams
2015-03-16 20:25 ` [RFC PATCH 5/7] scatterlist: support "page-less" (__pfn_t only) entries Dan Williams
2015-03-16 20:25 ` [RFC PATCH 6/7] x86: support dma_map_pfn() Dan Williams
2015-03-16 20:26 ` [RFC PATCH 7/7] block: base support for pfn i/o Dan Williams
2015-03-18 10:47 ` [RFC PATCH 0/7] evacuate struct page from the block layer Boaz Harrosh
2015-03-18 13:06   ` Matthew Wilcox
2015-03-18 14:38     ` [Linux-nvdimm] " Boaz Harrosh
2015-03-20 15:56       ` Rik van Riel
2015-03-22 11:53         ` Boaz Harrosh
2015-03-18 15:35   ` Dan Williams
2015-03-18 20:26 ` Andrew Morton
2015-03-19 13:43   ` Matthew Wilcox
2015-03-19 15:54     ` [Linux-nvdimm] " Boaz Harrosh
2015-03-19 19:59       ` Andrew Morton
2015-03-19 20:59         ` Dan Williams
2015-03-22 17:22           ` Boaz Harrosh
2015-03-20 17:32         ` Wols Lists
2015-03-22 10:30         ` Boaz Harrosh
2015-03-19 18:17     ` Christoph Hellwig
2015-03-19 19:31       ` Matthew Wilcox
2015-03-22 16:46       ` Boaz Harrosh
2015-03-20 16:21     ` Rik van Riel
2015-03-20 20:31       ` Matthew Wilcox
2015-03-20 21:08         ` Rik van Riel
2015-03-22 17:06           ` Boaz Harrosh
2015-03-22 17:22             ` Dan Williams
2015-03-22 17:39               ` Boaz Harrosh
2015-03-20 21:17         ` Wols Lists
2015-03-22 16:24         ` Boaz Harrosh [this message]
2015-03-22 15:51       ` Boaz Harrosh
2015-03-23 15:19         ` Rik van Riel
2015-03-23 19:30           ` Christoph Hellwig
2015-03-24  9:41           ` Boaz Harrosh
2015-03-24 16:57             ` Rik van Riel

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=550EECD2.4000604@plexistor.com \
    --to=boaz@plexistor.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
    --cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-nvdimm@ml01.01.org \
    --cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mgorman@suse.de \
    --cc=mst@redhat.com \
    --cc=riel@redhat.com \
    --cc=willy@linux.intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).