From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Boaz Harrosh Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] RFC: dax: dax_prepare_freeze Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2015 08:14:59 +0200 Message-ID: <551100E3.9010007@plexistor.com> References: <55100B78.501@plexistor.com> <55100D10.6090902@plexistor.com> <20150323224047.GQ28621@dastard> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Matthew Wilcox , Andrew Morton , "Kirill A. Shutemov" , Jan Kara , Hugh Dickins , Mel Gorman , linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-nvdimm , linux-fsdevel , Eryu Guan To: Dave Chinner Return-path: Received: from mail-wg0-f52.google.com ([74.125.82.52]:36249 "EHLO mail-wg0-f52.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751346AbbCXGPC (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 Mar 2015 02:15:02 -0400 Received: by wgra20 with SMTP id a20so162878253wgr.3 for ; Mon, 23 Mar 2015 23:15:01 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20150323224047.GQ28621@dastard> Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 03/24/2015 12:40 AM, Dave Chinner wrote: > On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 02:54:40PM +0200, Boaz Harrosh wrote: >> From: Boaz Harrosh >> >> When freezing an FS, we must write protect all IS_DAX() >> inodes that have an mmap mapping on an inode. Otherwise >> application will be able to modify previously faulted-in >> file pages. > > All you need to do is lock out page faults once the page is clean; > that's what the sb_start_pagefault() calls are for in the page fault > path - they catch write faults and block them until the filesystem > is unfrozen. Hence I'm not sure why this would be necessary if you > are catching write faults in .pfn_mkwrite.... > Jan pointed it out and he was right I have a test for this. What happens is that since we had a mapping from before the freeze we will not have a page-fault. And the buffers will be modified. As Jan explained in the cache path we do a writeback which turns all pages to read-only. But with dax we do not have writeback so the pages stay read-write mapped. Something needs to loop through the pages and write-protect them. I chose to unmap them because it is the much-much smaller code, and I do not care to optimize the freeze. [Yes, sigh, I will convert the test to an xfstest. May I just add it to some existing fs_freeze test. Only novelty is that we need to write-access an mmap block before the freeze-start, then continue access after the freeze and see modifications ] > Cheers, > Dave. > Thanks Boaz