From: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
To: "Ming Lin-SSI" <ming.l@ssi.samsung.com>,
"Matias Bjørling" <m@bjorling.me>, "Jens Axboe" <axboe@fb.com>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6] block: add support for carrying a stream ID in a bio
Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2015 19:42:21 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5512127D.2040508@kernel.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3A47B4705F6BE24CBB43C61AA73286215067DA@SSIEXCH-MB3.ssi.samsung.com>
On 03/24/2015 04:07 PM, Ming Lin-SSI wrote:
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Jens Axboe [mailto:axboe@kernel.dk]
>> Sent: Tuesday, March 24, 2015 10:27 AM
>> To: Matias Bjørling; Jens Axboe; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; linux-
>> fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
>> Cc: Ming Lin-SSI
>> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6] block: add support for carrying a stream ID in a bio
>>
>> On 03/24/2015 11:11 AM, Matias Bjørling wrote:
>>> On 03/24/2015 04:26 PM, Jens Axboe wrote:
>>>> The top bits of bio->bi_flags are reserved for keeping the allocation
>>>> pool, set aside the next four bits for carrying a stream ID. That
>>>> leaves us with support for 15 streams,
>>>> 0 is reserved as a "stream not set" value.
>>>
>>> 15 streams seem very limited. Can this be extended? e.g. 16 bits.
>>>
>>> 15 streams is enough for 1-4 applications. More, and applications
>>> starts to fight over the same stream id's, leading them to place
>>> different age data in same flash blocks and push us back to square one.
>>>
>>> I understand that Samsung multi-stream SSD supports a limited amount
>>> of streams, more advance implementations should provide higher limits.
>>
>> Pushing it higher is not a big deal as far as the implementation goes, though
>> 16 bits might be stealing a bit too much space for this. On 32-bit archs, we
>> have 18 bits currently free that we can abuse. The Samsung device supports
>> 16 streams. That's honestly a lot more than I would expect most devices to
>> support in hardware, 16 is a lot of open erase blocks and write append points.
>> Obviously the open channel effort would make that more feasible, though.
>
> Can we use 8 bits at least? I'll test performance with 16 streams.
We could, but I still question whether that's really useful. I'd rather
start smaller and go bigger if there's a real use case for it. It wont
change the user space ABI if we later make it larger.
--
Jens Axboe
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-03-25 1:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-03-24 15:26 [PATCH RFC] Support for write stream IDs Jens Axboe
2015-03-24 15:26 ` [PATCH 1/6] block: add support for carrying a stream ID in a bio Jens Axboe
2015-03-24 17:11 ` Matias Bjørling
2015-03-24 17:26 ` Jens Axboe
2015-03-24 22:07 ` Ming Lin-SSI
2015-03-25 1:42 ` Jens Axboe [this message]
2015-03-25 8:11 ` Matias Bjørling
2015-03-25 18:36 ` Ming Lin-SSI
2015-03-25 2:30 ` Dave Chinner
2015-04-12 10:42 ` Dmitry Monakhov
2015-03-24 15:26 ` [PATCH 2/6] Add support for per-file stream ID Jens Axboe
2015-03-24 15:27 ` [PATCH 3/6] direct-io: add support for write stream IDs Jens Axboe
2015-03-25 2:43 ` Dave Chinner
2015-03-25 14:26 ` Jens Axboe
2015-04-10 23:50 ` Ming Lin
2015-04-11 0:06 ` Ming Lin
2015-04-11 11:59 ` Dave Chinner
2015-04-17 6:20 ` Ming Lin
2015-04-17 23:06 ` Dave Chinner
2015-04-17 23:11 ` Jens Axboe
2015-04-17 23:51 ` Dave Chinner
2015-04-18 2:00 ` Jens Axboe
2015-04-17 15:17 ` Jens Axboe
2015-03-24 15:27 ` [PATCH 4/6] Add stream ID support for buffered writeback Jens Axboe
2015-03-25 2:40 ` Dave Chinner
2015-03-25 14:17 ` Jens Axboe
2015-03-24 15:27 ` [PATCH 5/6] btrfs: add support for buffered writeback stream ID Jens Axboe
2015-03-24 15:27 ` [PATCH 6/6] xfs: " Jens Axboe
2015-03-25 2:41 ` Dave Chinner
2015-03-24 17:03 ` [PATCH RFC] Support for write stream IDs Jeff Moyer
2015-03-24 17:08 ` Jens Axboe
2015-03-24 21:46 ` Ming Lin-SSI
2015-03-24 21:48 ` Jens Axboe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5512127D.2040508@kernel.dk \
--to=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=axboe@fb.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=m@bjorling.me \
--cc=ming.l@ssi.samsung.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).