From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>
Subject: Re: [RFC] Per-file compression
Date: Sat, 18 Apr 2015 17:52:57 +0200
Message-ID: <55327DD9.8060209@nod.at>
References: <55318733.4000503@cyngn.com> <CAFLxGvzO_6v6ZuTit1svu=Cja4tYT0xfns-iR4NuHG6i6CadrQ@mail.gmail.com> <20150418145828.GA13809@eden.sea.cyngn.com> <55327324.3030400@nod.at> <20150418154854.GA14343@eden.sea.cyngn.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>
To: Tom Marshall <tom@cyngn.com>
Return-path: <linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from a.ns.miles-group.at ([95.130.255.143]:65275 "EHLO radon.swed.at"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1754170AbbDRPxA (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Sat, 18 Apr 2015 11:53:00 -0400
In-Reply-To: <20150418154854.GA14343@eden.sea.cyngn.com>
Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org>

Am 18.04.2015 um 17:48 schrieb Tom Marshall:
>> ...your goals. Be flexible. ;)
>> BTW: ecryptfs is an overlay filesystem.
> 
> Given the choice of adding compression support to ecryptfs and making a new
> similar filesystem (ecompressfs?), which would you recommend?

I'd give ecryptfs a try to re-use as much existing code as possible.

Thanks,
//richard