From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Boaz Harrosh Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCHSET] non-recursive link_path_walk() and reducing stack footprint Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2015 19:46:48 +0300 Message-ID: <55367EF8.5090304@plexistor.com> References: <20150420181222.GK889@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> <20150421144959.GR889@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> <20150421150408.GA29838@infradead.org> <553668C1.8030707@nod.at> <20150421154504.GT889@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Christoph Hellwig , Linus Torvalds , NeilBrown , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org To: Al Viro , Richard Weinberger Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20150421154504.GT889@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org On 04/21/2015 06:45 PM, Al Viro wrote: > On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 05:12:01PM +0200, Richard Weinberger wrote: > >> I'm pretty sure we can kill it. I had the plan to rip it out during this merge window >> along with other broken UML stuff but I was too late to ask on the UML mailinglist >> if someone is using it (which I really doubt). >> So, let's kill it with v4.2. > > Let's do it. Then ->put_link() is left in an interesting situation - *all* > instances only use the 'cookie' argument... A future user of inode or anything else can embed that in the cookie anyway. Just my $0.017 Boaz