From: "Matias Bjørling" <m@bjorling.me>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Cc: axboe@fb.com, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org,
keith.busch@intel.com, javier@paletta.io
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/7] bio: Introduce LightNVM payload
Date: Mon, 11 May 2015 13:58:51 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5550997B.1000609@bjorling.me> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150509160007.GA16058@infradead.org>
On 05/09/2015 06:00 PM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 04:26:50PM +0200, Matias Bj??rling wrote:
>> LightNVM integrates on both sides of the block layer. The lower layer
>> implements mapping of logical to physical addressing, while the layer
>> above can string together multiple LightNVM devices and expose them as a
>> single block device.
>>
>> Having multiple devices underneath requires a way to resolve where the
>> IO came from when submitted through the block layer. Extending bio with
>> a LightNVM payload solves this problem.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Matias Bj??rling <m@bjorling.me>
>> ---
>> include/linux/bio.h | 9 +++++++++
>> include/linux/blk_types.h | 4 +++-
>> 2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/include/linux/bio.h b/include/linux/bio.h
>> index da3a127..4e31a1c 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/bio.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/bio.h
>> @@ -354,6 +354,15 @@ static inline void bip_set_seed(struct bio_integrity_payload *bip,
>>
>> #endif /* CONFIG_BLK_DEV_INTEGRITY */
>>
>> +#if defined(CONFIG_NVM)
>> +
>> +/* bio open-channel ssd payload */
>> +struct bio_nvm_payload {
>> + void *private;
>> +};
>
> Can you explain why this needs to be done on a per-bio instead of a
> per-request level? I don't really think a low-level driver should add
> fields to struct bio as that can be easily remapped.
When a bio is submitted through the block layer, it can be
merged/splitted on going through the block layer. Thus, we don't know
the number of physical addresses that must be mapped before its on the
other side.
There can be multiple targets using a single open-channel SSD.
Therefore, when its on the other side, it has to figure out which target
it was called from, so it can call the right mapping function.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-05-11 11:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-04-22 14:26 [PATCH v3 0/7] Support for Open-Channel SSDs Matias Bjørling
2015-04-22 14:26 ` [PATCH v3 1/7] bio: Introduce LightNVM payload Matias Bjørling
2015-05-09 16:00 ` Christoph Hellwig
2015-05-11 11:58 ` Matias Bjørling [this message]
2015-05-12 7:21 ` Christoph Hellwig
2015-04-22 14:26 ` [PATCH v3 2/7] block: add REQ_NVM_GC for targets gc Matias Bjørling
2015-05-09 16:00 ` Christoph Hellwig
2015-04-22 14:26 ` [PATCH v3 3/7] lightnvm: Support for Open-Channel SSDs Matias Bjørling
2015-04-22 14:26 ` [PATCH v3 4/7] lightnvm: RRPC target Matias Bjørling
2015-04-22 14:26 ` [PATCH v3 5/7] null_blk: LightNVM support Matias Bjørling
2015-04-22 14:26 ` [PATCH v3 6/7] nvme: rename and expose nvme_alloc_iod Matias Bjørling
2015-04-22 14:26 ` [PATCH v3 7/7] nvme: LightNVM support Matias Bjørling
2015-05-05 18:51 ` Matias Bjorling
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5550997B.1000609@bjorling.me \
--to=m@bjorling.me \
--cc=axboe@fb.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=javier@paletta.io \
--cc=keith.busch@intel.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).