* [PATCH RFC v7 1/9] vfs: Add sb_want_write() function to grant write access to sb without the struct file/vfsmount.
[not found] <1423201534-19309-1-git-send-email-quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com>
@ 2015-02-06 5:45 ` Qu Wenruo
2015-06-19 5:25 ` Qu Wenruo
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Qu Wenruo @ 2015-02-06 5:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-btrfs; +Cc: linux-fsdevel
There are sysfs interfaces in some fs, only btrfs yet, which will modify
on-disk data.
Unlike normal file operation routine we can use mnt_want_write_file() to
protect the operation, change through sysfs won't to be binded to any file
in the filesystem.
So introduce new sb_want_write() to do the protection against a super
block, which acts much like mnt_want_write() but will return success if
the super block is read-write.
The implement is to use a atomic value as a simplified rw-semaphore,
which only provides non-block lock method.
We don't use the traditional rw-sem because in do_umount(), we need to
block incoming sb_want_write() until the sb is killed if this is the
last mount instance.
However kill_sb() can be delayed to other thread, so down_write() and
up_write() will happen in different thread, and this is not allowed.
This patch also slightly modified struct super_block and
do_umount/remount(), where we do extra check for blocking sb_want_write()
and don't allow the umount of the *last* mount instance of a super block
or remount it ro.
Cc: linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
---
Changelog:
v4:
Newly introduced.
v5:
Change name to sb_want_write() and receive sb and parameter.
v6:
Add better check when umounting the last instance of a super block. So
sb_want_write() waiting for fs unfrozen/transaction will prevent
umount.
v7:
Use atomic instead of manually implemented rw-sem.
Add check for remount ro.
Fix some missing unlock in error handler.
Add internal helper function instead open-code.
---
fs/internal.h | 25 ++++++++++++++++++
fs/namespace.c | 70 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
fs/super.c | 15 ++++++++++-
include/linux/fs.h | 6 +++++
include/linux/mount.h | 2 ++
5 files changed, 117 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/fs/internal.h b/fs/internal.h
index e9a61fe..8d6ef11 100644
--- a/fs/internal.h
+++ b/fs/internal.h
@@ -69,6 +69,31 @@ extern int __mnt_want_write_file(struct file *);
extern void __mnt_drop_write(struct vfsmount *);
extern void __mnt_drop_write_file(struct file *);
+/* rw_sem like read/write down trylock helpers for sb_want_write() */
+static inline int __sb_read_down_trylock(struct super_block *sb)
+{
+ if (!atomic_add_unless(&sb->s_want_write_count, 1, -1))
+ return 0;
+ return 1;
+}
+
+static inline int __sb_write_down_trylock(struct super_block *sb)
+{
+ if (atomic_cmpxchg(&sb->s_want_write_count, 0, -1))
+ return 0;
+ return 1;
+}
+
+static inline void __sb_read_up(struct super_block *sb)
+{
+ atomic_dec(&sb->s_want_write_count);
+}
+
+static inline void __sb_write_up(struct super_block *sb)
+{
+ atomic_set(&sb->s_want_write_count, 0);
+}
+
/*
* fs_struct.c
*/
diff --git a/fs/namespace.c b/fs/namespace.c
index cd1e968..a4e8946 100644
--- a/fs/namespace.c
+++ b/fs/namespace.c
@@ -1105,6 +1105,47 @@ struct vfsmount *mntget(struct vfsmount *mnt)
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(mntget);
+/**
+ * sb_want_write - get write acess to a super block
+ * @sb: the superblock of the filesystem
+ *
+ * This tells the low-level filesystem that a write is about to be performed to
+ * it, and makes sure that the writes are allowed (superblock is read-write,
+ * filesystem is not frozen) before returning success.
+ * When the write operation is finished, sb_drop_write() must be called.
+ * This is much like mnt_want_write() as a refcount, but only needs
+ * the superblock to be read-write.
+ */
+int sb_want_write(struct super_block *sb)
+{
+
+ if (!__sb_read_down_trylock(sb))
+ return -EBUSY;
+
+ sb_start_write(sb);
+ if (sb->s_readonly_remount || sb->s_flags & MS_RDONLY) {
+ sb_drop_write(sb);
+ return -EROFS;
+ }
+ return 0;
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(sb_want_write);
+
+/**
+ * sb_drop_write - give up write acess to a super block
+ * @sb: the superblock on which to give up write access
+ *
+ * Tells the low-level filesystem that we are done performing writes to it and
+ * also allows filesystem to be frozen/remount ro again. Must be matched with
+ * sb_want_write() call above.
+ */
+void sb_drop_write(struct super_block *sb)
+{
+ sb_end_write(sb);
+ __sb_read_up(sb);
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(sb_drop_write);
+
struct vfsmount *mnt_clone_internal(struct path *path)
{
struct mount *p;
@@ -1382,6 +1423,9 @@ static void shrink_submounts(struct mount *mnt);
static int do_umount(struct mount *mnt, int flags)
{
struct super_block *sb = mnt->mnt.mnt_sb;
+ struct mount *tmp;
+ int mounts = 0;
+ int sb_write_hold = 0;
int retval;
retval = security_sb_umount(&mnt->mnt, flags);
@@ -1455,6 +1499,25 @@ static int do_umount(struct mount *mnt, int flags)
lock_mount_hash();
event++;
+ /*
+ * Check for blocking sb_want_write if the mount is the last mount
+ * instance of the superblock (+1 for namespace mount), and block
+ * further comming sb_want_write().
+ */
+ list_for_each_entry(tmp, &sb->s_mounts, mnt_instance) {
+ mounts++;
+ if (mounts > 2)
+ break;
+ }
+
+ if (mounts == 2) {
+ if (!__sb_write_down_trylock(sb)) {
+ retval = -EBUSY;
+ goto out;
+ }
+ sb_write_hold = 1;
+ }
+
if (flags & MNT_DETACH) {
if (!list_empty(&mnt->mnt_list))
umount_tree(mnt, 2);
@@ -1468,6 +1531,13 @@ static int do_umount(struct mount *mnt, int flags)
retval = 0;
}
}
+out:
+ /*
+ * Only unblock sb_want_write() if umount of last instance failed
+ * If umount succeeded, no need to unblock and let it die with sb.
+ */
+ if (sb_write_hold && retval)
+ __sb_write_up(sb);
unlock_mount_hash();
namespace_unlock();
return retval;
diff --git a/fs/super.c b/fs/super.c
index eae088f..10f49e4 100644
--- a/fs/super.c
+++ b/fs/super.c
@@ -230,6 +230,9 @@ static struct super_block *alloc_super(struct file_system_type *type, int flags)
s->s_shrink.count_objects = super_cache_count;
s->s_shrink.batch = 1024;
s->s_shrink.flags = SHRINKER_NUMA_AWARE;
+
+ atomic_set(&s->s_want_write_count, 0);
+
return s;
fail:
@@ -694,6 +697,7 @@ int do_remount_sb(struct super_block *sb, int flags, void *data, int force)
{
int retval;
int remount_ro;
+ int sb_write_hold = 0;
if (sb->s_writers.frozen != SB_UNFROZEN)
return -EBUSY;
@@ -716,6 +720,10 @@ int do_remount_sb(struct super_block *sb, int flags, void *data, int force)
return -EBUSY;
remount_ro = (flags & MS_RDONLY) && !(sb->s_flags & MS_RDONLY);
}
+ /* Don't remount ro if there is sb_want_write() waiting */
+ if (!__sb_write_down_trylock(sb))
+ return -EBUSY;
+ sb_write_hold = 1;
}
shrink_dcache_sb(sb);
@@ -728,7 +736,7 @@ int do_remount_sb(struct super_block *sb, int flags, void *data, int force)
} else {
retval = sb_prepare_remount_readonly(sb);
if (retval)
- return retval;
+ goto cancel_readonly;
}
}
@@ -757,10 +765,15 @@ int do_remount_sb(struct super_block *sb, int flags, void *data, int force)
*/
if (remount_ro && sb->s_bdev)
invalidate_bdev(sb->s_bdev);
+ if (sb_write_hold)
+ __sb_write_up(sb);
+
return 0;
cancel_readonly:
sb->s_readonly_remount = 0;
+ if (sb_write_hold)
+ __sb_write_up(sb);
return retval;
}
diff --git a/include/linux/fs.h b/include/linux/fs.h
index 42efe13..dc852e8 100644
--- a/include/linux/fs.h
+++ b/include/linux/fs.h
@@ -1305,6 +1305,12 @@ struct super_block {
* Indicates how deep in a filesystem stack this SB is
*/
int s_stack_depth;
+
+ /*
+ * sb_want_write() protector, to ensure remount ro or umount the last
+ * instance to return -EBUSY if there is sb_want_write() waiting.
+ */
+ atomic_t s_want_write_count;
};
extern struct timespec current_fs_time(struct super_block *sb);
diff --git a/include/linux/mount.h b/include/linux/mount.h
index c2c561d..abf4495 100644
--- a/include/linux/mount.h
+++ b/include/linux/mount.h
@@ -74,8 +74,10 @@ struct path;
extern int mnt_want_write(struct vfsmount *mnt);
extern int mnt_want_write_file(struct file *file);
extern int mnt_clone_write(struct vfsmount *mnt);
+extern int sb_want_write(struct super_block *sb);
extern void mnt_drop_write(struct vfsmount *mnt);
extern void mnt_drop_write_file(struct file *file);
+extern void sb_drop_write(struct super_block *sb);
extern void mntput(struct vfsmount *mnt);
extern struct vfsmount *mntget(struct vfsmount *mnt);
extern struct vfsmount *mnt_clone_internal(struct path *path);
--
2.2.2
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH RFC v7 1/9] vfs: Add sb_want_write() function to grant write access to sb without the struct file/vfsmount.
2015-02-06 5:45 ` [PATCH RFC v7 1/9] vfs: Add sb_want_write() function to grant write access to sb without the struct file/vfsmount Qu Wenruo
@ 2015-06-19 5:25 ` Qu Wenruo
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Qu Wenruo @ 2015-06-19 5:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-btrfs; +Cc: linux-fsdevel
Any new comments?
BTW, who is responsible to merge the vfs change patch?
Should btrfs maintainers to merge it or vfs maintainer?
Thanks,
Qu
Qu Wenruo wrote on 2015/02/06 13:45 +0800:
> There are sysfs interfaces in some fs, only btrfs yet, which will modify
> on-disk data.
> Unlike normal file operation routine we can use mnt_want_write_file() to
> protect the operation, change through sysfs won't to be binded to any file
> in the filesystem.
>
> So introduce new sb_want_write() to do the protection against a super
> block, which acts much like mnt_want_write() but will return success if
> the super block is read-write.
>
> The implement is to use a atomic value as a simplified rw-semaphore,
> which only provides non-block lock method.
> We don't use the traditional rw-sem because in do_umount(), we need to
> block incoming sb_want_write() until the sb is killed if this is the
> last mount instance.
> However kill_sb() can be delayed to other thread, so down_write() and
> up_write() will happen in different thread, and this is not allowed.
>
> This patch also slightly modified struct super_block and
> do_umount/remount(), where we do extra check for blocking sb_want_write()
> and don't allow the umount of the *last* mount instance of a super block
> or remount it ro.
>
> Cc: linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com>
> Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
> ---
> Changelog:
> v4:
> Newly introduced.
> v5:
> Change name to sb_want_write() and receive sb and parameter.
> v6:
> Add better check when umounting the last instance of a super block. So
> sb_want_write() waiting for fs unfrozen/transaction will prevent
> umount.
> v7:
> Use atomic instead of manually implemented rw-sem.
> Add check for remount ro.
> Fix some missing unlock in error handler.
> Add internal helper function instead open-code.
> ---
> fs/internal.h | 25 ++++++++++++++++++
> fs/namespace.c | 70 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> fs/super.c | 15 ++++++++++-
> include/linux/fs.h | 6 +++++
> include/linux/mount.h | 2 ++
> 5 files changed, 117 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/internal.h b/fs/internal.h
> index e9a61fe..8d6ef11 100644
> --- a/fs/internal.h
> +++ b/fs/internal.h
> @@ -69,6 +69,31 @@ extern int __mnt_want_write_file(struct file *);
> extern void __mnt_drop_write(struct vfsmount *);
> extern void __mnt_drop_write_file(struct file *);
>
> +/* rw_sem like read/write down trylock helpers for sb_want_write() */
> +static inline int __sb_read_down_trylock(struct super_block *sb)
> +{
> + if (!atomic_add_unless(&sb->s_want_write_count, 1, -1))
> + return 0;
> + return 1;
> +}
> +
> +static inline int __sb_write_down_trylock(struct super_block *sb)
> +{
> + if (atomic_cmpxchg(&sb->s_want_write_count, 0, -1))
> + return 0;
> + return 1;
> +}
> +
> +static inline void __sb_read_up(struct super_block *sb)
> +{
> + atomic_dec(&sb->s_want_write_count);
> +}
> +
> +static inline void __sb_write_up(struct super_block *sb)
> +{
> + atomic_set(&sb->s_want_write_count, 0);
> +}
> +
> /*
> * fs_struct.c
> */
> diff --git a/fs/namespace.c b/fs/namespace.c
> index cd1e968..a4e8946 100644
> --- a/fs/namespace.c
> +++ b/fs/namespace.c
> @@ -1105,6 +1105,47 @@ struct vfsmount *mntget(struct vfsmount *mnt)
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(mntget);
>
> +/**
> + * sb_want_write - get write acess to a super block
> + * @sb: the superblock of the filesystem
> + *
> + * This tells the low-level filesystem that a write is about to be performed to
> + * it, and makes sure that the writes are allowed (superblock is read-write,
> + * filesystem is not frozen) before returning success.
> + * When the write operation is finished, sb_drop_write() must be called.
> + * This is much like mnt_want_write() as a refcount, but only needs
> + * the superblock to be read-write.
> + */
> +int sb_want_write(struct super_block *sb)
> +{
> +
> + if (!__sb_read_down_trylock(sb))
> + return -EBUSY;
> +
> + sb_start_write(sb);
> + if (sb->s_readonly_remount || sb->s_flags & MS_RDONLY) {
> + sb_drop_write(sb);
> + return -EROFS;
> + }
> + return 0;
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(sb_want_write);
> +
> +/**
> + * sb_drop_write - give up write acess to a super block
> + * @sb: the superblock on which to give up write access
> + *
> + * Tells the low-level filesystem that we are done performing writes to it and
> + * also allows filesystem to be frozen/remount ro again. Must be matched with
> + * sb_want_write() call above.
> + */
> +void sb_drop_write(struct super_block *sb)
> +{
> + sb_end_write(sb);
> + __sb_read_up(sb);
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(sb_drop_write);
> +
> struct vfsmount *mnt_clone_internal(struct path *path)
> {
> struct mount *p;
> @@ -1382,6 +1423,9 @@ static void shrink_submounts(struct mount *mnt);
> static int do_umount(struct mount *mnt, int flags)
> {
> struct super_block *sb = mnt->mnt.mnt_sb;
> + struct mount *tmp;
> + int mounts = 0;
> + int sb_write_hold = 0;
> int retval;
>
> retval = security_sb_umount(&mnt->mnt, flags);
> @@ -1455,6 +1499,25 @@ static int do_umount(struct mount *mnt, int flags)
> lock_mount_hash();
> event++;
>
> + /*
> + * Check for blocking sb_want_write if the mount is the last mount
> + * instance of the superblock (+1 for namespace mount), and block
> + * further comming sb_want_write().
> + */
> + list_for_each_entry(tmp, &sb->s_mounts, mnt_instance) {
> + mounts++;
> + if (mounts > 2)
> + break;
> + }
> +
> + if (mounts == 2) {
> + if (!__sb_write_down_trylock(sb)) {
> + retval = -EBUSY;
> + goto out;
> + }
> + sb_write_hold = 1;
> + }
> +
> if (flags & MNT_DETACH) {
> if (!list_empty(&mnt->mnt_list))
> umount_tree(mnt, 2);
> @@ -1468,6 +1531,13 @@ static int do_umount(struct mount *mnt, int flags)
> retval = 0;
> }
> }
> +out:
> + /*
> + * Only unblock sb_want_write() if umount of last instance failed
> + * If umount succeeded, no need to unblock and let it die with sb.
> + */
> + if (sb_write_hold && retval)
> + __sb_write_up(sb);
> unlock_mount_hash();
> namespace_unlock();
> return retval;
> diff --git a/fs/super.c b/fs/super.c
> index eae088f..10f49e4 100644
> --- a/fs/super.c
> +++ b/fs/super.c
> @@ -230,6 +230,9 @@ static struct super_block *alloc_super(struct file_system_type *type, int flags)
> s->s_shrink.count_objects = super_cache_count;
> s->s_shrink.batch = 1024;
> s->s_shrink.flags = SHRINKER_NUMA_AWARE;
> +
> + atomic_set(&s->s_want_write_count, 0);
> +
> return s;
>
> fail:
> @@ -694,6 +697,7 @@ int do_remount_sb(struct super_block *sb, int flags, void *data, int force)
> {
> int retval;
> int remount_ro;
> + int sb_write_hold = 0;
>
> if (sb->s_writers.frozen != SB_UNFROZEN)
> return -EBUSY;
> @@ -716,6 +720,10 @@ int do_remount_sb(struct super_block *sb, int flags, void *data, int force)
> return -EBUSY;
> remount_ro = (flags & MS_RDONLY) && !(sb->s_flags & MS_RDONLY);
> }
> + /* Don't remount ro if there is sb_want_write() waiting */
> + if (!__sb_write_down_trylock(sb))
> + return -EBUSY;
> + sb_write_hold = 1;
> }
> shrink_dcache_sb(sb);
>
> @@ -728,7 +736,7 @@ int do_remount_sb(struct super_block *sb, int flags, void *data, int force)
> } else {
> retval = sb_prepare_remount_readonly(sb);
> if (retval)
> - return retval;
> + goto cancel_readonly;
> }
> }
>
> @@ -757,10 +765,15 @@ int do_remount_sb(struct super_block *sb, int flags, void *data, int force)
> */
> if (remount_ro && sb->s_bdev)
> invalidate_bdev(sb->s_bdev);
> + if (sb_write_hold)
> + __sb_write_up(sb);
> +
> return 0;
>
> cancel_readonly:
> sb->s_readonly_remount = 0;
> + if (sb_write_hold)
> + __sb_write_up(sb);
> return retval;
> }
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/fs.h b/include/linux/fs.h
> index 42efe13..dc852e8 100644
> --- a/include/linux/fs.h
> +++ b/include/linux/fs.h
> @@ -1305,6 +1305,12 @@ struct super_block {
> * Indicates how deep in a filesystem stack this SB is
> */
> int s_stack_depth;
> +
> + /*
> + * sb_want_write() protector, to ensure remount ro or umount the last
> + * instance to return -EBUSY if there is sb_want_write() waiting.
> + */
> + atomic_t s_want_write_count;
> };
>
> extern struct timespec current_fs_time(struct super_block *sb);
> diff --git a/include/linux/mount.h b/include/linux/mount.h
> index c2c561d..abf4495 100644
> --- a/include/linux/mount.h
> +++ b/include/linux/mount.h
> @@ -74,8 +74,10 @@ struct path;
> extern int mnt_want_write(struct vfsmount *mnt);
> extern int mnt_want_write_file(struct file *file);
> extern int mnt_clone_write(struct vfsmount *mnt);
> +extern int sb_want_write(struct super_block *sb);
> extern void mnt_drop_write(struct vfsmount *mnt);
> extern void mnt_drop_write_file(struct file *file);
> +extern void sb_drop_write(struct super_block *sb);
> extern void mntput(struct vfsmount *mnt);
> extern struct vfsmount *mntget(struct vfsmount *mnt);
> extern struct vfsmount *mnt_clone_internal(struct path *path);
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2015-06-19 5:25 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <1423201534-19309-1-git-send-email-quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com>
2015-02-06 5:45 ` [PATCH RFC v7 1/9] vfs: Add sb_want_write() function to grant write access to sb without the struct file/vfsmount Qu Wenruo
2015-06-19 5:25 ` Qu Wenruo
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).