From: Linda Knippers <linda.knippers@hp.com>
To: Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@redhat.com>, Boaz Harrosh <boaz@plexistor.com>
Cc: "Wilcox, Matthew R" <matthew.r.wilcox@intel.com>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: regression introduced by "block: Add support for DAX reads/writes to block devices"
Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2015 12:42:32 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <55CCC8F8.6080204@hp.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <x49fv3n5lw9.fsf@segfault.boston.devel.redhat.com>
On 8/13/2015 10:00 AM, Jeff Moyer wrote:
> Boaz Harrosh <boaz@plexistor.com> writes:
>
>> On 08/13/2015 12:11 AM, Jeff Moyer wrote:
>>> Boaz Harrosh <boaz@plexistor.com> writes:
>>>
>>>> On 08/07/2015 11:41 PM, Jeff Moyer wrote:
>>>> <>
>>>>>
>>>>>> We need to cope with the case where the end of a partition isn't on a
>>>>>> page boundary though.
>>>>>
>>>>> Well, that's usually done by falling back to buffered I/O. I gave that
>>>>> a try and panicked the box. :) I'll keep looking into it, but probably
>>>>> won't have another patch until next week.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> lets slow down for a sec, please.
>>>>
>>>> We have all established that an unaligned partition start is BAD and not supported?
>>>
>>> No. Unaligned partitions on RAID arrays or 512e devices are bad because
>>> they result in suboptimal performance. They are most certainly still
>>> supported, though.
>>>
>>
>> What ?
>>
>> I meant for dax on pmem or brd. I meant that we *do not* support dax access
>> on an unaligned partition start. (None dax is perfectly supported)
>
> Sorry, I thought your statement was broader than that.
>
>> We did it this way because of the direct_access API that returns a pfn
>> with is PAGE_SIZE. We could introduce a pfn+offset but we thought it is
>> not worth it, and that dax should be page aligned for code simplicity
>
> I'd be fine with changing the persistent memory block device to only
> support 4k logical, 4k physical block size. That probably makes the
> most sense.
If that's what we want, the current patch doesn't do that.
https://lists.01.org/pipermail/linux-nvdimm/2015-July/001555.html
It causes the physical block size to be PAGE_SIZE but the
logical block size is still 512. However, the minimum_io_size
is now 4096 (same as physical block size, I assume). The
optimal_io_size is still 0. What does that mean?
Whatever we go with, we should do something because 4.2rc6 is still
broken, unable to create a xfs file system on a pmem device, ever
since the change to use DAX on block devices with O_DIRECT.
-- ljk
>
> Cheers,
> Jeff
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-08-13 16:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-08-05 20:19 regression introduced by "block: Add support for DAX reads/writes to block devices" Jeff Moyer
2015-08-05 22:01 ` Dave Chinner
2015-08-06 1:42 ` Linda Knippers
2015-08-06 3:24 ` Dave Chinner
2015-08-06 7:52 ` Boaz Harrosh
2015-08-06 20:34 ` Dave Chinner
2015-08-09 8:52 ` Boaz Harrosh
2015-08-10 16:32 ` Linda Knippers
2015-08-10 21:27 ` Dave Chinner
2015-08-10 23:04 ` Linda Knippers
2015-08-06 14:21 ` Wilcox, Matthew R
2015-08-06 15:33 ` Jeff Moyer
2015-08-06 15:51 ` Wilcox, Matthew R
2015-08-06 21:30 ` Jeff Moyer
2015-08-07 18:11 ` Wilcox, Matthew R
2015-08-07 20:41 ` Jeff Moyer
2015-08-10 7:42 ` Boaz Harrosh
2015-08-12 21:11 ` Jeff Moyer
2015-08-13 5:32 ` Boaz Harrosh
2015-08-13 14:00 ` Jeff Moyer
2015-08-13 16:42 ` Linda Knippers [this message]
2015-08-13 17:14 ` Jeff Moyer
2015-08-13 17:52 ` Linda Knippers
2015-08-13 18:19 ` Jeff Moyer
2015-08-13 19:32 ` Wilcox, Matthew R
2015-08-14 16:28 ` Dan Williams
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=55CCC8F8.6080204@hp.com \
--to=linda.knippers@hp.com \
--cc=boaz@plexistor.com \
--cc=jmoyer@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=matthew.r.wilcox@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).