linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [GIT PULL] superblock scalability patches
@ 2015-08-19 17:52 Josef Bacik
  2015-08-21 22:45 ` Dave Chinner
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Josef Bacik @ 2015-08-19 17:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Al Viro; +Cc: linux-fsdevel, dchinner, kernel-team

Hello,

Al would you please consider pulling from

git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/josef/btrfs-next.git 
superblock-scaling

I've rebased them onto Linus's master as of a few days ago and retested 
them to make sure they were still good to go.  They've all been through 
a lengthy review process and thoroughly tested.  The only change since 
the last time I posted the patch series is I've dropped the patch that 
created a new writeback list for sync to process because of the new 
writeback changes.  Porting that patch over is going to take some extra 
work and I don't want to hold up the rest of these patches any longer. 
Thanks,

Josef

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

* Re: [GIT PULL] superblock scalability patches
  2015-08-19 17:52 [GIT PULL] superblock scalability patches Josef Bacik
@ 2015-08-21 22:45 ` Dave Chinner
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Dave Chinner @ 2015-08-21 22:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Josef Bacik; +Cc: Al Viro, linux-fsdevel, dchinner, kernel-team

On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 10:52:54AM -0700, Josef Bacik wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> Al would you please consider pulling from
> 
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/josef/btrfs-next.git
> superblock-scaling
> 
> I've rebased them onto Linus's master as of a few days ago and
> retested them to make sure they were still good to go.  They've all
> been through a lengthy review process and thoroughly tested.  The
> only change since the last time I posted the patch series is I've
> dropped the patch that created a new writeback list for sync to
> process because of the new writeback changes.  Porting that patch
> over is going to take some extra work and I don't want to hold up
> the rest of these patches any longer. Thanks,

Been testing this for a day now, it seems to be fine. The patch that
is missingis the really important scalability fix (i.e. the one that
avoids the entire inode cache walk to find dirty inodes), but I can
live with that being delayed to get all the prep merged sooner.

Tested-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>

Thanks, Josef!

Cheers,

Dave.
-- 
Dave Chinner
david@fromorbit.com

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2015-08-21 22:45 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2015-08-19 17:52 [GIT PULL] superblock scalability patches Josef Bacik
2015-08-21 22:45 ` Dave Chinner

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).