From: Dongsheng Yang <yangds.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
To: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>,
<linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org>, <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
<dedekind1@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] UBIFS: Add freeze support in ubifs
Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2015 11:10:05 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5608AF8D.4060402@cn.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5607A387.9050703@nod.at>
On 09/27/2015 04:06 PM, Richard Weinberger wrote:
> Yang,
>
> Am 27.09.2015 um 04:39 schrieb Dongsheng Yang:
>> We need to do nothing in ubifs, as all is already done in vfs.
>
> Please more details. :-)
Oh, this patch is really an incorrect one. At least I have to add
sb_start/end_intwrite and sb_start/end_pagefault in ubifs at
first. And I have to add more details about what I am doing and
why. Will send v2 later.
I think I was out of my mind yesterday, this patch is really not ready
to go in my local box. :(
Sorry for the noisy.
Yang
> The current changelog reads like every filesystem should implement
> it as nop. Which is obviously not the case.
>
> fs/super.c checks whether ->freeze_fs() is implemented, so
> a nop-implementation does not make sense here.
>
> I bet you hit this in fs/ioctl.c:
> /* If filesystem doesn't support freeze feature, return. */
> if (sb->s_op->freeze_fs == NULL && sb->s_op->freeze_super == NULL)
> return -EOPNOTSUPP;
>
> Correct?
>
> And the most important detail is missing, why is UBIFS allowed
> to have a nop-implementation?
>
> Thanks,
> //richard
> .
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-09-28 3:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-09-27 2:39 [PATCH] UBIFS: Add freeze support in ubifs Dongsheng Yang
2015-09-27 8:06 ` Richard Weinberger
2015-09-28 3:10 ` Dongsheng Yang [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5608AF8D.4060402@cn.fujitsu.com \
--to=yangds.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=dedekind1@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=richard@nod.at \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).