From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Bob Liu Subject: Re: [PATCH 06/32] xen blkback: prepare for bi_rw split Date: Mon, 09 Nov 2015 12:00:48 +0800 Message-ID: <56401A70.7090504@oracle.com> References: <1446674909-5371-1-git-send-email-mchristi@redhat.com> <1446674909-5371-7-git-send-email-mchristi@redhat.com> <20151107101713.GB12117@infradead.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, RogerPauMonnérroger.pau@citrix.com, linux-raid@vger.kernel.org, dm-devel@redhat.com, mchristi@redhat.com, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org, drbd-dev@lists.linbit.com To: Christoph Hellwig Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20151107101713.GB12117@infradead.org> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org List-Id: linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org On 11/07/2015 06:17 PM, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > A little offtopic for this patch, but can some explain this whole > mess about bios in Xen blkfront? We can happily do partial completions > at the request later. > > Also since the blk-mq conversion the call to blk_end_request_all is This will be fixed after my next blk-mq patch series which also modified the recover path. > completely broken, so it doesn't look like this code path is exactly > well tested. > Thanks, -Bob