From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: Allow GFP_IOFS for page_cache_read page cache allocation To: Michal Hocko , Jan Kara References: <1447251233-14449-1-git-send-email-mhocko@kernel.org> <20151112095301.GA25265@quack.suse.cz> <20151126150820.GI7953@dhcp22.suse.cz> Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, Andrew Morton , Tetsuo Handa , Mel Gorman , Dave Chinner , Mark Fasheh , ocfs2-devel@oss.oracle.com, ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, LKML From: Vlastimil Babka Message-ID: <56588789.1010300@suse.cz> Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2015 17:40:41 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20151126150820.GI7953@dhcp22.suse.cz> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: On 11/26/2015 04:08 PM, Michal Hocko wrote: > On Thu 12-11-15 10:53:01, Jan Kara wrote: >> On Wed 11-11-15 15:13:53, mhocko@kernel.org wrote: >>> >>> Hi, >>> this has been posted previously as a part of larger GFP_NOFS related >>> patch set (http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1438768284-30927-1-git-send-email-mhocko%40kernel.org) >>> but I think it makes sense to discuss it even out of that scope. >>> >>> I would like to hear FS and other MM people about the proposed interface. >>> Using mapping_gfp_mask blindly doesn't sound good to me and vm_fault >>> looks like a proper channel to communicate between MM and FS layers. >>> >>> Comments? Are there any better ideas? >> >> Makes sense to me and the filesystems I know should be fine with this >> (famous last words ;). Feel free to add: >> >> Acked-by: Jan Kara > > Thanks a lot! Are there any objections from other fs/mm people? Please replace "GFP_IOFS" in the subject, as the "flag" has been removed recently. Otherwise Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org