From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:44771 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932984AbcAYQEf (ORCPT ); Mon, 25 Jan 2016 11:04:35 -0500 Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/7 V3] quota: add new quotactl Q_GETNEXTQUOTA To: Jan Kara References: <1453487136-12681-1-git-send-email-sandeen@redhat.com> <20160125150710.GN24938@quack.suse.cz> Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, xfs@oss.sgi.com, Dave Chinner From: Eric Sandeen Message-ID: <56A64790.9090100@redhat.com> Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2016 10:04:32 -0600 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20160125150710.GN24938@quack.suse.cz> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 1/25/16 9:07 AM, Jan Kara wrote: > On Fri 22-01-16 12:25:29, Eric Sandeen wrote: ... > So I've taken patch 1/7 into my tree since that is completely independent. > Patches 2/7 and 3/7 look mostly good to me (except for that small omission > in 3/7) so I can take them to my tree as well. Once I'll finish testing > some UDF changes I have pending I'll push the tree to: Jan, thanks for catching & fixing those issues. > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jack/linux-fs.git for_next > > and Dave can pull from there to have a basis for XFS patches. I want to > implement Q_GETNEXTQUOTA for VFS quota formats as well and those will go > through my tree so that's why I want the interface changes go via my tree. Makes sense to me. Thanks, -Eric