From: Mike Christie <mchristi@redhat.com>
To: Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, konrad.wilk@oracle.com,
drbd-dev@lists.linbit.com, philipp.reisner@linbit.com,
lars.ellenberg@linbit.com, linux-raid@vger.kernel.org,
dm-devel@redhat.com, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-bcache@vger.kernel.org, linux-block@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org,
linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, target-devel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, osd-dev@open-osd.org,
xfs@oss.sgi.com, ocfs2-devel@oss.oracle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/42] v7: separate operations from flags in the bio/request structs
Date: Wed, 4 May 2016 12:51:59 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <572A36BF.3070208@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <x49d1p2c1nx.fsf@segfault.boston.devel.redhat.com>
On 05/03/2016 03:44 PM, Jeff Moyer wrote:
> mchristi@redhat.com writes:
>
>> The following patches begin to cleanup the request->cmd_flags and
>> bio->bi_rw mess. We currently use cmd_flags to specify the operation,
>> attributes and state of the request. For bi_rw we use it for similar
>> info and also the priority but then also have another bi_flags field
>> for state. At some point, we abused them so much we just made cmd_flags
>> 64 bits, so we could add more.
>>
>> The following patches seperate the operation (read, write discard,
>> flush, etc) from cmd_flags/bi_rw.
>>
>> This patchset was made against linux-next from today April 15
>> (git tag next-20160415).
>>
>> I put a git tree here:
>> https://github.com/mikechristie/linux-kernel.git
>> The patches are in the op branch.
>
> Hi, Mike,
>
> That git tree doesn't seem to exist. I did manage to apply your patch
> set on top of next-20160415, though.
>
> So... what testing did you do? ;-) I ran into the following problems
I normally run xfstests and run it on my daily workstation and laptop. I
did not do this for every FS this time and hit a regression.
What FS were you using?
> - git clone fails
> - yum segfaults
In v7/v6, I missed a new submit_bio call, so I hit issues like the two
above. I have this fixed in the next version.
> - many blktrace/blkparse issues, including incorrect cpu recorded in
> traces, null task names, and blkparse outputting nothing for a trace
> file several gigabytes in size.
I will double check for these issues.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-05-04 17:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 51+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-04-15 19:15 [PATCH 00/42] v7: separate operations from flags in the bio/request structs mchristi
2016-04-15 19:15 ` [PATCH 01/42] block/fs/drivers: remove rw argument from submit_bio mchristi
2016-04-15 19:15 ` [PATCH 02/42] block: add REQ_OP definitions and bi_op/op fields mchristi
2016-04-15 19:15 ` [PATCH 03/42] block, fs, mm, drivers: set bi_op to REQ_OP mchristi
2016-04-15 19:15 ` [PATCH 04/42] fs: have submit_bh users pass in op and flags separately mchristi
2016-04-15 19:15 ` [PATCH 05/42] fs: have ll_rw_block " mchristi
2016-04-15 19:15 ` [PATCH 06/42] direct-io: set bi_op to REQ_OP mchristi
2016-04-15 19:15 ` [PATCH 07/42] btrfs: have submit_one_bio users setup bio bi_op mchristi
2016-04-15 19:15 ` [PATCH 08/42] btrfs: set bi_op tp REQ_OP mchristi
2016-04-15 19:15 ` [PATCH 09/42] btrfs: update __btrfs_map_block for bi_op transition mchristi
2016-04-15 19:15 ` [PATCH 10/42] btrfs: use bio fields for op and flags mchristi
2016-04-15 19:15 ` [PATCH 11/42] f2fs: set bi_op to REQ_OP mchristi
2016-04-15 19:15 ` [PATCH 12/42] gfs2: " mchristi
2016-04-15 19:15 ` [PATCH 13/42] xfs: " mchristi
2016-04-15 19:15 ` [PATCH 14/42] hfsplus: " mchristi
2016-04-15 19:15 ` [PATCH 15/42] mpage: " mchristi
2016-04-15 19:15 ` [PATCH 16/42] nilfs: " mchristi
2016-04-18 16:04 ` Ryusuke Konishi
2016-04-15 19:15 ` [PATCH 17/42] ocfs2: " mchristi
2016-04-15 19:15 ` [PATCH 18/42] pm: " mchristi
2016-04-15 19:15 ` [PATCH 19/42] dm: " mchristi
2016-04-15 19:15 ` [PATCH 20/42] dm: pass dm stats data dir instead of bi_rw mchristi
2016-04-15 19:15 ` [PATCH 21/42] bcache: set bi_op to REQ_OP mchristi
2016-04-15 19:15 ` [PATCH 22/42] drbd: " mchristi
2016-04-15 19:15 ` [PATCH 23/42] md/raid: " mchristi
2016-04-23 23:05 ` [PATCH] RAID Cleanup for bio-split Shaun Tancheff
2016-04-15 19:15 ` [PATCH 24/42] xen: set bi_op to REQ_OP mchristi
2016-04-15 19:16 ` [PATCH 25/42] target: " mchristi
2016-04-15 19:16 ` [PATCH 26/42] block: copy bio op to request op mchristi
2016-04-15 19:16 ` [PATCH 27/42] block: prepare request creation/destruction code to use REQ_OPs mchristi
2016-04-15 19:16 ` [PATCH 28/42] block: prepare mq request creation " mchristi
2016-04-15 19:16 ` [PATCH 29/42] block: prepare elevator " mchristi
2016-04-15 19:16 ` [PATCH 30/42] blkg_rwstat: separate op from flags mchristi
2016-04-15 19:16 ` [PATCH 31/42] block: convert merge/insert code to check for REQ_OPs mchristi
2016-04-15 19:16 ` [PATCH 32/42] block: convert is_sync helpers to use REQ_OPs mchristi
2016-04-15 19:16 ` [PATCH 33/42] block: convert rq_data_dir helper " mchristi
2016-04-15 19:16 ` [PATCH 34/42] drivers: set request op to REQ_OP mchristi
2016-04-15 19:16 ` [PATCH 35/42] blktrace: get op from req->op/bio->bi_op mchristi
2016-04-15 19:16 ` [PATCH 36/42] ide cd: do not set REQ_WRITE on requests mchristi
2016-04-15 19:16 ` [PATCH 37/42] block, fs, drivers: do use bi_rw/cmd_flags for REQ_OPs mchristi
2016-04-15 19:16 ` [PATCH 38/42] block, fs: remove old REQ definitions mchristi
2016-04-15 19:16 ` [PATCH 39/42] block: shrink bio/request fields mchristi
2016-04-15 19:16 ` [PATCH 40/42] block, drivers: add REQ_OP_FLUSH operation mchristi
2016-04-15 19:16 ` [PATCH 41/42] block: do not use REQ_FLUSH for tracking flush support mchristi
2016-04-17 8:46 ` Juergen Gross
2016-04-15 19:16 ` [PATCH 42/42] block, drivers, fs: rename REQ_FLUSH to REQ_PREFLUSH mchristi
2016-04-15 19:44 ` [PATCH 00/42] v7: separate operations from flags in the bio/request structs Mike Snitzer
2016-05-03 20:44 ` Jeff Moyer
2016-05-04 17:51 ` Mike Christie [this message]
2016-05-04 17:58 ` Jeff Moyer
2016-05-04 18:04 ` Mike Christie
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=572A36BF.3070208@redhat.com \
--to=mchristi@redhat.com \
--cc=dm-devel@redhat.com \
--cc=drbd-dev@lists.linbit.com \
--cc=jmoyer@redhat.com \
--cc=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
--cc=lars.ellenberg@linbit.com \
--cc=linux-bcache@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ocfs2-devel@oss.oracle.com \
--cc=osd-dev@open-osd.org \
--cc=philipp.reisner@linbit.com \
--cc=target-devel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).