From: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>
To: NeilBrown <nfbrown@novell.com>, Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
Cc: linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org" <linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org>,
Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind1@gmail.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
NFS List <linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Reconsidering exportable UBIFS
Date: Wed, 11 May 2016 16:09:34 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <57333D1E.9090706@nod.at> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87y47ju8kk.fsf@notabene.neil.brown.name>
Am 09.05.2016 um 07:03 schrieb NeilBrown:
> On Mon, May 09 2016, Al Viro wrote:
>
>> On Mon, May 09, 2016 at 08:18:22AM +1000, NeilBrown wrote:
>>
>>> Not puppies, just kittens.
>>>
>>> If you don't provide these functions, then exporting with
>>> "subtree_check" won't work. That is no great loss except that people
>>> might find the failure confusing.
>>
>> OK, a client sends you a RENAME. With fhandles of both parents +
>> old and new names in those. Your task, should you choose to accept it, is
>> to figure out whether we should fail with nfserr_inval due to an attempt
>> to make a directory its own descendent. Without being able to locate all
>> ancestors of a directory.
>
> You are right, sorry. I was thinking that get_parent() was for finding
> the parent of a non-directory, but it is for directories. It does the
> equivalent of lookup(".."). So if you have a ".." link or something
> like it, it should be easy. If you don't, it won't be easy at all.
Thanks for the detailed explanation.
UBIFS does not have ".." links in the on-flash layout.
So, we'd have to change this.
Thanks,
//richard
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-05-11 14:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-04-04 22:17 Reconsidering exportable UBIFS Richard Weinberger
2016-04-18 9:04 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2016-05-08 22:18 ` NeilBrown
2016-05-08 23:25 ` Al Viro
2016-05-09 5:03 ` NeilBrown
2016-05-11 14:09 ` Richard Weinberger [this message]
2016-05-11 14:10 ` Richard Weinberger
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=57333D1E.9090706@nod.at \
--to=richard@nod.at \
--cc=dedekind1@gmail.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nfbrown@novell.com \
--cc=viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).