From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:58672 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751425AbcELIgF (ORCPT ); Thu, 12 May 2016 04:36:05 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] mount.2: document MS_REC and shared subtree flags To: Omar Sandoval , Michael Kerrisk References: <8896f51c3802ade59b398058c1d22c9830f9ae09.1463037379.git.osandov@fb.com> Cc: linux-man@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, Omar Sandoval From: Florian Weimer Message-ID: <57344070.3020603@redhat.com> Date: Thu, 12 May 2016 10:36:00 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <8896f51c3802ade59b398058c1d22c9830f9ae09.1463037379.git.osandov@fb.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 05/12/2016 09:17 AM, Omar Sandoval wrote: > +.BR MS_PRIVATE " (since Linux 2.6.15)" > +Set the mount propagation on this mountpoint to private. Mounts will not > +propagate to or from replicated subtrees. > +When used, this must be the only flag in > +.IR mountflags . Is the last sentence actually true? Further down, your patch mentions combining MS_PRIVATE with other flags. Thanks, Florian