From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91B1FC25B4E for ; Tue, 24 Jan 2023 12:56:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S233617AbjAXM4v (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 Jan 2023 07:56:51 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:33496 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S233521AbjAXM4u (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 Jan 2023 07:56:50 -0500 Received: from ams.source.kernel.org (ams.source.kernel.org [IPv6:2604:1380:4601:e00::1]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2347630D6; Tue, 24 Jan 2023 04:56:15 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtp.kernel.org (relay.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ams.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 202CBB811C2; Tue, 24 Jan 2023 12:56:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 610B1C433D2; Tue, 24 Jan 2023 12:56:11 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1674564971; bh=aXc+7DU6wiR86FkbJyGCIgne5RjiAMbSraY5xIyxN/E=; h=Subject:From:To:Cc:Date:From; b=khv49ls4LJDMmPLiDX2Fa8CIs+yEjZ2WYe6zmCw70KtBL1uCrDqguVsDbeJVkR29U 1wGG3tZibVkNwC69DAPT/k9DdlWqxosjkkYyCQQdorVjjJXODjVFwRj3GiM+zsMKhj 6tngYqy7z6F3YIjKBVqCHFe8F4WeIsJh11jTk20GWP8pz7VAywlhjs++vZi2Ro1QIW Cw89WYGkqef76miU3mqDCl8UxlQBLy0STRLdF0cbXnxwRgITrVxOx6ZnkH11VzR2Tn +tXnkTNrnQ/4PGHGdgKUPyxm9SsIWvQx5UyAmwyxr5I7Pcl6O2BsM4QwU1Un0RYMfv IwxtAOseKRihQ== Message-ID: <57c413ed362c0beab06b5d83b7fc4b930c7662c4.camel@kernel.org> Subject: replacement i_version counter for xfs From: Jeff Layton To: linux-xfs Cc: linux-fsdevel Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2023 07:56:09 -0500 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable User-Agent: Evolution 3.46.3 (3.46.3-1.fc37) MIME-Version: 1.0 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org A few months ago, I posted a patch to make xfs not bump its i_version counter on atime updates. Dave Chinner NAK'ed that patch, mentioning that xfs would need to replace it with an entirely new field as the existing counter is used for other purposes and its semantics are set in stone. Has anything been done toward that end? Should I file a bug report or something? It would be nice to get this going so that XFS can continue to be a viable filesystem for exporting via NFS. Thanks, --=20 Jeff Layton