From: Zhang Yi <yi.zhang@huaweicloud.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Cc: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, djwong@kernel.org,
brauner@kernel.org, david@fromorbit.com, jack@suse.cz,
willy@infradead.org, yi.zhang@huawei.com,
chengzhihao1@huawei.com, yukuai3@huawei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/6] iomap: advance the ifs allocation if we have more than one blocks per folio
Date: Sat, 17 Aug 2024 12:27:49 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <58d9c752-1b40-0af8-370c-cf03144c54c0@huaweicloud.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZrxBfKi_DpThYo94@infradead.org>
On 2024/8/14 13:32, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 12, 2024 at 08:11:56PM +0800, Zhang Yi wrote:
>> From: Zhang Yi <yi.zhang@huawei.com>
>>
>> Now we allocate ifs if i_blocks_per_folio is larger than one when
>> writing back dirty folios in iomap_writepage_map(), so we don't attach
>> an ifs after buffer write to an entire folio until it starts writing
>> back, if we partial truncate that folio, iomap_invalidate_folio() can't
>> clear counterpart block's dirty bit as expected. Fix this by advance the
>> ifs allocation to __iomap_write_begin().
>
> Wouldn't it make more sense to only allocate the ifѕ in
> iomap_invalidate_folio when it actually is needed?
>
I forget to mention that truncate_inode_partial_folio() call
folio_invalidate()->iomap_invalidate_folio() only when the folio has
private, if the folio doesn't has ifs, the iomap_invalidate_folio()
would nerver be called, hence allocate the ifs in
iomap_invalidate_folio() is useless.
In my opinion, one solution is change to always call folio_invalidate()
in truncate_inode_partial_folio(), all callbacks should handle the no
private case. Another solution is add a magic (a fake ifs) to
folio->private and then convert it to a real one in
iomap_invalidate_folio(), any thoughts?
Thanks,
Yi.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-08-17 4:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-08-12 12:11 [PATCH v2 0/6] iomap: some minor non-critical fixes and improvements when block size < folio size Zhang Yi
2024-08-12 12:11 ` [PATCH v2 1/6] iomap: correct the range of a partial dirty clear Zhang Yi
2024-08-12 16:33 ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-08-13 2:14 ` Zhang Yi
2024-08-14 1:53 ` Dave Chinner
2024-08-12 12:11 ` [PATCH v2 2/6] iomap: support invalidating partial folios Zhang Yi
2024-08-12 16:55 ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-08-12 12:11 ` [PATCH v2 3/6] iomap: advance the ifs allocation if we have more than one blocks per folio Zhang Yi
2024-08-12 12:47 ` yangerkun
2024-08-13 2:21 ` Zhang Yi
2024-08-14 5:32 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-08-14 7:08 ` Zhang Yi
2024-08-15 6:00 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-08-16 1:44 ` Zhang Yi
2024-08-17 4:27 ` Zhang Yi [this message]
2024-08-17 4:42 ` Matthew Wilcox
2024-08-17 6:16 ` Zhang Yi
2024-08-12 12:11 ` [PATCH v2 4/6] iomap: correct the dirty length in page mkwrite Zhang Yi
2024-08-12 16:45 ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-08-13 2:49 ` Zhang Yi
2024-08-14 5:36 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-08-14 7:49 ` Zhang Yi
2024-08-15 5:59 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-08-16 2:19 ` Zhang Yi
2024-08-17 4:45 ` Matthew Wilcox
2024-08-17 6:43 ` Zhang Yi
2024-08-12 12:11 ` [PATCH v2 5/6] iomap: don't mark blocks uptodate after partial zeroing Zhang Yi
2024-08-12 16:49 ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-08-13 3:01 ` Zhang Yi
2024-08-14 5:39 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-08-17 4:48 ` Matthew Wilcox
2024-08-17 7:16 ` Zhang Yi
2024-08-12 12:11 ` [PATCH v2 6/6] iomap: reduce unnecessary state_lock when setting ifs uptodate and dirty bits Zhang Yi
2024-08-12 16:54 ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-08-12 17:00 ` Matthew Wilcox
2024-08-13 8:15 ` Zhang Yi
2024-08-14 1:49 ` [PATCH v2 0/6] iomap: some minor non-critical fixes and improvements when block size < folio size Dave Chinner
2024-08-14 2:14 ` Zhang Yi
2024-08-14 2:47 ` Dave Chinner
2024-08-14 3:57 ` Zhang Yi
2024-08-14 5:16 ` Dave Chinner
2024-08-14 6:32 ` Zhang Yi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=58d9c752-1b40-0af8-370c-cf03144c54c0@huaweicloud.com \
--to=yi.zhang@huaweicloud.com \
--cc=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=chengzhihao1@huawei.com \
--cc=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=djwong@kernel.org \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
--cc=yi.zhang@huawei.com \
--cc=yukuai3@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).