* Fwd: trinity test fanotify cause hungtasks on kernel 4.13
[not found] <5979B8A5.205@huawei.com>
@ 2017-07-28 3:52 ` Gu Zheng
2017-07-28 7:45 ` Jan Kara
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Gu Zheng @ 2017-07-28 3:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: eparis, viro, Jan Kara; +Cc: linux-fsdevel, linux-kernel, miaoxie@huawei.com
hi,ALL:
when we used the trinity test the fanotify interfaces, it cause many hungtasks.
CONFIG_FANOTIFY_ACCESS_PERMISSIONS=y
the shell is simple:
1 #!/bin/bash
2
3 while true
4 do
5 ./trinity -c fanotify_init -l off -C 2 -X > /dev/null 2>&1 &
6 sleep 1
7 ./trinity -c fanotify_mark -l off -C 2 -X > /dev/null 2>&1 &
8 sleep 10
9 done
we found the trinity enter the D state fastly.
we check the pids'stack
[root@localhost ~]# ps -aux | grep D
USER PID %CPU %MEM VSZ RSS TTY STAT START TIME COMMAND
root 977 0.0 0.0 207992 7904 ? Ss 15:23 0:00 /usr/bin/abrt-watch-log -F BUG: WARNING: at WARNING: CPU: INFO: possible recursive locking detected ernel BUG at list_del corruption list_add corruption do_IRQ: stack overflow: ear stack overflow (cur: eneral protection fault nable to handle kernel ouble fault: RTNL: assertion failed eek! page_mapcount(page) went negative! adness at NETDEV WATCHDOG ysctl table check failed : nobody cared IRQ handler type mismatch Machine Check Exception: Machine check events logged divide error: bounds: coprocessor segment overrun: invalid TSS: segment not present: invalid opcode: alignment check: stack segment: fpu exception: simd exception: iret exception: /var/log/messages -- /usr/bin/abrt-dump-oops -xtD
root 997 0.0 0.0 203360 3188 ? Ssl 15:23 0:00 /usr/sbin/gssproxy -D
root 1549 0.0 0.0 82552 6012 ? Ss 15:23 0:00 /usr/sbin/sshd -D
root 2807 3.5 0.2 59740 35416 pts/0 DL 15:24 0:00 ./trinity -c fanotify_init -l off -C 2 -X
root 2809 3.1 0.2 53712 35332 pts/0 DL 15:24 0:00 ./trinity -c fanotify_mark -l off -C 2 -X
root 2915 0.0 0.0 136948 1776 pts/0 D 15:24 0:00 ps ax
root 2919 0.0 0.0 112656 2100 pts/1 S+ 15:24 0:00 grep --color=auto D
[root@localhost ~]# cat /proc/2807/stack
[<ffffffff95287551>] fanotify_handle_event+0x2a1/0x2f0
[<ffffffff95283c13>] fsnotify+0x2d3/0x4f0
[<ffffffff952f3a89>] security_file_open+0x89/0x90
[<ffffffff95239819>] do_dentry_open+0x139/0x330
[<ffffffff9523ad9f>] vfs_open+0x4f/0x70
[<ffffffff9524c428>] path_openat+0x548/0x1350
[<ffffffff9524ea51>] do_filp_open+0x91/0x100
[<ffffffff9523b174>] do_sys_open+0x124/0x210
[<ffffffff9523b27e>] SyS_open+0x1e/0x20
[<ffffffff95003857>] do_syscall_64+0x67/0x150
[<ffffffff95741de7>] entry_SYSCALL64_slow_path+0x25/0x25
[<ffffffffffffffff>] 0xffffffffffffffff
[root@localhost ~]# cat /proc/2915/stack
[<ffffffff95287551>] fanotify_handle_event+0x2a1/0x2f0
[<ffffffff95283c13>] fsnotify+0x2d3/0x4f0
[<ffffffff952f3a89>] security_file_open+0x89/0x90
[<ffffffff95239819>] do_dentry_open+0x139/0x330
[<ffffffff9523ad9f>] vfs_open+0x4f/0x70
[<ffffffff9524c428>] path_openat+0x548/0x1350
[<ffffffff9524ea51>] do_filp_open+0x91/0x100
[<ffffffff9523b174>] do_sys_open+0x124/0x210
[<ffffffff9523b27e>] SyS_open+0x1e/0x20
[<ffffffff95003857>] do_syscall_64+0x67/0x150
[<ffffffff95741de7>] entry_SYSCALL64_slow_path+0x25/0x25
[<ffffffffffffffff>] 0xffffffffffffffff
[root@localhost ~]# cat /proc/2809/stack
[<ffffffff95287551>] fanotify_handle_event+0x2a1/0x2f0
[<ffffffff95283c13>] fsnotify+0x2d3/0x4f0
[<ffffffff952f3a89>] security_file_open+0x89/0x90
[<ffffffff95239819>] do_dentry_open+0x139/0x330
[<ffffffff9523ad9f>] vfs_open+0x4f/0x70
[<ffffffff9524c428>] path_openat+0x548/0x1350
[<ffffffff9524ea51>] do_filp_open+0x91/0x100
[<ffffffff9523b174>] do_sys_open+0x124/0x210
[<ffffffff9523b27e>] SyS_open+0x1e/0x20
[<ffffffff95003857>] do_syscall_64+0x67/0x150
[<ffffffff95741de7>] entry_SYSCALL64_slow_path+0x25/0x25
[<ffffffffffffffff>] 0xffffffffffffffff
all progresses are waiting for the response in fanotify_handle_event->fanotify_get_response,
becauseof non-response or killed monitor,so the waitqueue is in blocked state,
then the others will be stucked which use the fanotify_get_response.
if we use wait_event_timeout , the responed time can not be guaranteed.
do you have any ideas?
thanks.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: Fwd: trinity test fanotify cause hungtasks on kernel 4.13
2017-07-28 3:52 ` Fwd: trinity test fanotify cause hungtasks on kernel 4.13 Gu Zheng
@ 2017-07-28 7:45 ` Jan Kara
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Jan Kara @ 2017-07-28 7:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Gu Zheng
Cc: eparis, viro, Jan Kara, linux-fsdevel, linux-kernel,
miaoxie@huawei.com
On Fri 28-07-17 11:52:13, Gu Zheng wrote:
>
> hi,ALL:
> when we used the trinity test the fanotify interfaces, it cause many hungtasks.
> CONFIG_FANOTIFY_ACCESS_PERMISSIONS=y
> the shell is simple:
> 1 #!/bin/bash
> 2
> 3 while true
> 4 do
> 5 ./trinity -c fanotify_init -l off -C 2 -X > /dev/null 2>&1 &
> 6 sleep 1
> 7 ./trinity -c fanotify_mark -l off -C 2 -X > /dev/null 2>&1 &
> 8 sleep 10
> 9 done
> we found the trinity enter the D state fastly.
> we check the pids'stack
<snip>
> all progresses are waiting for the response in fanotify_handle_event->fanotify_get_response,
> becauseof non-response or killed monitor,so the waitqueue is in blocked state,
> then the others will be stucked which use the fanotify_get_response.
Yes, this all works as expected.
> if we use wait_event_timeout , the responed time can not be guaranteed.
>
> do you have any ideas?
So if your target is sensible trinity testing of fanotify, what you could
do is that you would gather all descriptors where fanotify_init()
succeeded, watch them and reply to all fanotify events. Alternatively you
could just close these descriptors - that would tear down fanotify instance
and all events will be auto-accepted.
Honza
--
Jan Kara <jack@suse.com>
SUSE Labs, CR
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2017-07-28 7:45 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <5979B8A5.205@huawei.com>
2017-07-28 3:52 ` Fwd: trinity test fanotify cause hungtasks on kernel 4.13 Gu Zheng
2017-07-28 7:45 ` Jan Kara
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).