linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
To: Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@amazon.com>,
	Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>,
	Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuni1840@gmail.com>, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/2] fs/lock: Cleanup around flock syscall.
Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2022 06:43:11 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <59be17b0006f5aa866d176b8aedc582023f1d8b3.camel@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220717043532.35821-1-kuniyu@amazon.com>

On Sat, 2022-07-16 at 21:35 -0700, Kuniyuki Iwashima wrote:
> The first patch removes allocate-and-free for struct file_lock
> in flock syscall and the second patch rearrange some operations.
> 
> Changes:
>   v3:
>     * Test LOCK_MAND first in patch 2
> 
>   v2: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-fsdevel/20220716233343.22106-1-kuniyu@amazon.com/
>     * Use F_UNLCK in locks_remove_flock() (Chuck Lever)
>     * Fix uninitialised error in flock syscall (kernel test robot)
>     * Fix error when setting LOCK_NB
>     * Split patches not to mix different kinds of optimisations and
>       not to miss errors reported by kernel test robot
> 
>   v1: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-fsdevel/20220716013140.61445-1-kuniyu@amazon.com/
> 
> 
> Kuniyuki Iwashima (2):
>   fs/lock: Don't allocate file_lock in flock_make_lock().
>   fs/lock: Rearrange ops in flock syscall.
> 
>  fs/locks.c | 77 ++++++++++++++++++++----------------------------------
>  1 file changed, 28 insertions(+), 49 deletions(-)
> 

This looks good, and I've added it to the branch I feed into linux-next.
If all goes well, I'll plan to ask Linus to pull this in for v5.20.
Since you respun it, I dropped Chuck's Reviewed-by. Chuck, please re-
review if you want me to put that back.

Thanks!
-- 
Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>

      parent reply	other threads:[~2022-07-18 10:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-07-17  4:35 [PATCH v3 0/2] fs/lock: Cleanup around flock syscall Kuniyuki Iwashima
2022-07-17  4:35 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] fs/lock: Don't allocate file_lock in flock_make_lock() Kuniyuki Iwashima
2022-07-18 13:54   ` Chuck Lever III
2022-07-17  4:35 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] fs/lock: Rearrange ops in flock syscall Kuniyuki Iwashima
2022-07-18 10:43 ` Jeff Layton [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=59be17b0006f5aa866d176b8aedc582023f1d8b3.camel@kernel.org \
    --to=jlayton@kernel.org \
    --cc=chuck.lever@oracle.com \
    --cc=kuni1840@gmail.com \
    --cc=kuniyu@amazon.com \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).