linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Raz Ben-Jehuda(caro)" <raziebe@gmail.com>
To: Tyler <pml@dtbb.net>
Cc: Al Boldi <a1426z@gawab.com>,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
	Linux RAID Mailing List <linux-raid@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: Good, recent FS comparison?
Date: Sun, 18 Sep 2005 14:29:49 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5d96567b05091804291a451796@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <432D3024.3080302@dtbb.net>

what is ordered mode that xfs doesn't support ?

On 9/18/05, Tyler <pml@dtbb.net> wrote:
> 
> Al Boldi wrote:
> 
> >Tyler wrote:
> >
> >
> >>Ewan Grantham wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>>I've just setup a nice, 6-disk, USB-2 300 Gig/disk array, and was
> >>>prepared to follow my normal pattern of installing ext3 as the
> >>>filesystem. However, I saw the interview with Hans Reiser about
> >>>ReiserFS4, and am now wondering if reiser has really improved enough
> >>>to use it, or if ext3 is still the way to go?
> >>>
> >>>
> >>You'd be best off trying some tests of your own, using files of the size
> >>and quantity you expect to use on a regular basis.  I would consider
> >>ext3, xfs, and reiser3/4... and run some tests with them.  We've had
> >>really good luck using XFS on large raids, I personally had a bad
> >>experience with reiserfs 3, it lost data on a USB based drive, as if it
> >>were never even there, even after trying the recovery tools.
> >>
> >>
> >
> >Don't touch anything that doesn't do ordered-mode journaling, especially if
> >you use raid, unless your data-consistency requirements don't require this.
> >
> >XFS is best, but does not support ordered-mode.
> >reiser4 is still new.
> >ext3 is rock-solid!
> >
> >--
> >Al
> >
> >-
> >To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
> >the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> >More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> >
> >
> Al... you've given us some "do's" .. can you give us some "why's" to go
> along with them? :)  I would appreciate a run-down with some more
> specific info as to what/why.
> 
> Thanks,
> Tyler.
> 
> 
> --
> No virus found in this outgoing message.
> Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
> Version: 7.0.344 / Virus Database: 267.11.1/104 - Release Date: 9/16/2005
> 
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> 


-- 
Raz

  reply	other threads:[~2005-09-18 11:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <6d5bedd8050915131148b8108a@mail.gmail.com>
     [not found] ` <432A37BF.7060305@dtbb.net>
2005-09-16 21:17   ` Good, recent FS comparison? Al Boldi
2005-09-18  9:15     ` Tyler
2005-09-18 11:29       ` Raz Ben-Jehuda(caro) [this message]
2005-09-18 12:32       ` Al Boldi
2005-09-18 16:34       ` Matt Stegman
2005-09-20 21:00         ` George N. White III
2005-12-27 23:33       ` James Northrup
2005-12-28  1:45         ` Randy.Dunlap
2005-12-28  2:02           ` James Northrup
2005-09-21 15:37     ` Jamie Lokier
2005-09-21 21:34       ` Al Boldi
2005-09-22 12:14         ` Jamie Lokier
2005-09-22 13:55           ` Al Boldi

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5d96567b05091804291a451796@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=raziebe@gmail.com \
    --cc=a1426z@gawab.com \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-xfs@oss.sgi.com \
    --cc=pml@dtbb.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).