From: Jiaying Zhang <jiayingz@google.com>
To: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: deadlocks with fs quotas
Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2009 11:19:09 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5df78e1d0907071119y69136b50s9e05f93eceef8c75@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090707160824.GC24457@duck.suse.cz>
Sure. Here is the new patch that has my signed-off-by and also
uses I_MUTEX_QUOTA while acquiring i_mutex.
Signed-off-by: Jiaying Zhang <jiayingz@google.com>
Index: git-linux/fs/quota/dquot.c
===================================================================
--- git-linux.orig/fs/quota/dquot.c 2009-05-20 18:05:55.000000000 -0700
+++ git-linux/fs/quota/dquot.c 2009-07-07 11:16:43.000000000 -0700
@@ -2042,8 +2042,8 @@
* changes */
invalidate_bdev(sb->s_bdev);
}
- mutex_lock(&inode->i_mutex);
mutex_lock(&dqopt->dqonoff_mutex);
+ mutex_lock_nested(&inode->i_mutex, I_MUTEX_QUOTA);
if (sb_has_quota_loaded(sb, type)) {
error = -EBUSY;
goto out_lock;
@@ -2094,7 +2094,6 @@
dqopt->files[type] = NULL;
iput(inode);
out_lock:
- mutex_unlock(&dqopt->dqonoff_mutex);
if (oldflags != -1) {
down_write(&dqopt->dqptr_sem);
/* Set the flags back (in the case of accidental quotaon()
@@ -2104,6 +2103,7 @@
up_write(&dqopt->dqptr_sem);
}
mutex_unlock(&inode->i_mutex);
+ mutex_unlock(&dqopt->dqonoff_mutex);
out_fmt:
put_quota_format(fmt);
Jiaying
On Tue, Jul 7, 2009 at 9:08 AM, Jan Kara<jack@suse.cz> wrote:
> On Fri 26-06-09 18:05:15, Jiaying Zhang wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> I am looking at the fs quota code while debugging a deadlock problem
>> on ext2 file system. I found there is a potential deadlock between quotaon
>> and quotaoff (or quotasync). Basically, all of quotactl operations need to
>> be protected by dqonoff_mutex. vfs_quota_off and vfs_quota_sync also call
>> sb->s_op->quota_write that needs to grab the i_mutex of the quota file.
>> But in vfs_quota_on_inode (called from quotaon operation), the current
>> code tries to grab the i_mutex of the quota file first before getting
>> quonoff_mutex.
>>
>> Here is a simple test to show the problem:
>> $ while true; do quotaon /dev/hda >&/dev/null; usleep $RANDOM; done &
>> $ while true; do quotaoff /dev/hda >&/dev/null; usleep $RANDOM; done &
>>
>> After running for a while, the two processes get deadlocked.
>> Below is my proposed change to fix the problem:
> Jiaying, can you add your Signed-off-by to the patch so that I can merge
> it? Thanks.
>
> Honza
>> Index: git-linux/fs/quota/dquot.c
>> ===================================================================
>> --- git-linux.orig/fs/quota/dquot.c 2009-05-20 18:05:55.000000000 -0700
>> +++ git-linux/fs/quota/dquot.c 2009-06-26 17:57:04.000000000 -0700
>> @@ -2042,8 +2042,8 @@
>> * changes */
>> invalidate_bdev(sb->s_bdev);
>> }
>> - mutex_lock(&inode->i_mutex);
>> mutex_lock(&dqopt->dqonoff_mutex);
>> + mutex_lock(&inode->i_mutex);
>> if (sb_has_quota_loaded(sb, type)) {
>> error = -EBUSY;
>> goto out_lock;
>> @@ -2094,7 +2094,6 @@
>> dqopt->files[type] = NULL;
>> iput(inode);
>> out_lock:
>> - mutex_unlock(&dqopt->dqonoff_mutex);
>> if (oldflags != -1) {
>> down_write(&dqopt->dqptr_sem);
>> /* Set the flags back (in the case of accidental quotaon()
>> @@ -2104,6 +2103,7 @@
>> up_write(&dqopt->dqptr_sem);
>> }
>> mutex_unlock(&inode->i_mutex);
>> + mutex_unlock(&dqopt->dqonoff_mutex);
>> out_fmt:
>> put_quota_format(fmt);
>>
>>
>> Also while debugging the problem, I found the following code path:
>>
>> shrink_icache_memory -> prune_icache (grab iprune_mutex) -> dispose_list ->
>> clear_inode -> dquot_drop -> dqput -> dquot_release ->
>> dqopt->ops[dquot->dq_type]->write_file_info ->
>> sb->s_op->quota_write (i.e., ext2_quota_write for ext2)
>>
>> AFAICT, it seems very deadlock prone that the quota system tries to write
>> the quota file while clearing an inode. The ext2_quota_write calls
>> ext2_get_block that may block at alloc_page that in turn may try to call
>> shrink_icache_memory when the system is low in memory. But the
>> iprune_mutex is already hold by the process so the system will get
>> into deadlock here. I haven't got a test case that shows the deadlock but
>> want to raise this issue here first to see if I have missed anything.
>>
>> Jiaying
> --
> Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
> SUSE Labs, CR
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-07-07 18:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-06-27 1:05 deadlocks with fs quotas Jiaying Zhang
2009-06-27 18:31 ` Jan Kara
2009-06-30 0:12 ` Jiaying Zhang
2009-07-07 16:08 ` Jan Kara
2009-07-07 18:19 ` Jiaying Zhang [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5df78e1d0907071119y69136b50s9e05f93eceef8c75@mail.gmail.com \
--to=jiayingz@google.com \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).