* Re: linux-next: Tree for Feb 22 (NFSD_V2_ACL)
[not found] <20220223014135.2764641-1-broonie@kernel.org>
@ 2022-02-23 6:08 ` Randy Dunlap
2022-02-23 15:58 ` Chuck Lever III
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Randy Dunlap @ 2022-02-23 6:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: broonie, Linux Next Mailing List
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, akpm, Linux FS-devel Mailing List,
Chuck Lever, linux-nfs
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 554 bytes --]
On 2/22/22 17:41, broonie@kernel.org wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Note that today's -next does not include the akpm tree since it's been a
> long day and the conflicts seemed more than it was wise for me to
> attempt at this point. I'll have another go tomorrow but no guarantees.
>
> Changes since 20220217:
>
on x86_64:
WARNING: unmet direct dependencies detected for NFSD_V2_ACL
Depends on [n]: NETWORK_FILESYSTEMS [=y] && NFSD [=n]
Selected by [y]:
- NFSD_V3_ACL [=y] && NETWORK_FILESYSTEMS [=y]
Full randconfig file is attached.
--
~Randy
[-- Attachment #2: config-r2276.gz --]
[-- Type: application/gzip, Size: 31481 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: linux-next: Tree for Feb 22 (NFSD_V2_ACL)
2022-02-23 6:08 ` linux-next: Tree for Feb 22 (NFSD_V2_ACL) Randy Dunlap
@ 2022-02-23 15:58 ` Chuck Lever III
2022-02-24 6:45 ` Randy Dunlap
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Chuck Lever III @ 2022-02-23 15:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Randy Dunlap
Cc: broonie@kernel.org, Linux Next Mailing List,
Linux Kernel Mailing List, Andrew Morton,
Linux FS-devel Mailing List, Linux NFS Mailing List
> On Feb 23, 2022, at 1:08 AM, Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org> wrote:
>
> On 2/22/22 17:41, broonie@kernel.org wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Note that today's -next does not include the akpm tree since it's been a
>> long day and the conflicts seemed more than it was wise for me to
>> attempt at this point. I'll have another go tomorrow but no guarantees.
>>
>> Changes since 20220217:
>
> on x86_64:
>
> WARNING: unmet direct dependencies detected for NFSD_V2_ACL
> Depends on [n]: NETWORK_FILESYSTEMS [=y] && NFSD [=n]
> Selected by [y]:
> - NFSD_V3_ACL [=y] && NETWORK_FILESYSTEMS [=y]
Thanks, Randy. I think I've got it addressed in my for-next.
--
Chuck Lever
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: linux-next: Tree for Feb 22 (NFSD_V2_ACL)
2022-02-23 15:58 ` Chuck Lever III
@ 2022-02-24 6:45 ` Randy Dunlap
2022-02-24 15:08 ` Chuck Lever III
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Randy Dunlap @ 2022-02-24 6:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Chuck Lever III
Cc: broonie@kernel.org, Linux Next Mailing List,
Linux Kernel Mailing List, Andrew Morton,
Linux FS-devel Mailing List, Linux NFS Mailing List
On 2/23/22 07:58, Chuck Lever III wrote:
>
>> On Feb 23, 2022, at 1:08 AM, Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org> wrote:
>>
>> On 2/22/22 17:41, broonie@kernel.org wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> Note that today's -next does not include the akpm tree since it's been a
>>> long day and the conflicts seemed more than it was wise for me to
>>> attempt at this point. I'll have another go tomorrow but no guarantees.
>>>
>>> Changes since 20220217:
>>
>> on x86_64:
>>
>> WARNING: unmet direct dependencies detected for NFSD_V2_ACL
>> Depends on [n]: NETWORK_FILESYSTEMS [=y] && NFSD [=n]
>> Selected by [y]:
>> - NFSD_V3_ACL [=y] && NETWORK_FILESYSTEMS [=y]
>
> Thanks, Randy. I think I've got it addressed in my for-next.
Hi Chuck,
I'm still seeing this in next-20220223...
--
~Randy
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: linux-next: Tree for Feb 22 (NFSD_V2_ACL)
2022-02-24 6:45 ` Randy Dunlap
@ 2022-02-24 15:08 ` Chuck Lever III
2022-02-24 16:37 ` Randy Dunlap
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Chuck Lever III @ 2022-02-24 15:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Randy Dunlap
Cc: broonie@kernel.org, Linux Next Mailing List,
Linux Kernel Mailing List, Andrew Morton,
Linux FS-devel Mailing List, Linux NFS Mailing List
> On Feb 24, 2022, at 1:45 AM, Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 2/23/22 07:58, Chuck Lever III wrote:
>>
>>> On Feb 23, 2022, at 1:08 AM, Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org> wrote:
>>>
>>> On 2/22/22 17:41, broonie@kernel.org wrote:
>>>> Hi all,
>>>>
>>>> Note that today's -next does not include the akpm tree since it's been a
>>>> long day and the conflicts seemed more than it was wise for me to
>>>> attempt at this point. I'll have another go tomorrow but no guarantees.
>>>>
>>>> Changes since 20220217:
>>>
>>> on x86_64:
>>>
>>> WARNING: unmet direct dependencies detected for NFSD_V2_ACL
>>> Depends on [n]: NETWORK_FILESYSTEMS [=y] && NFSD [=n]
>>> Selected by [y]:
>>> - NFSD_V3_ACL [=y] && NETWORK_FILESYSTEMS [=y]
>>
>> Thanks, Randy. I think I've got it addressed in my for-next.
>
> Hi Chuck,
>
> I'm still seeing this in next-20220223...
I tested my fixed version of the commit with the randconfig
you attached to yesterday's email. Do you see this in
fs/nfsd/Kconfig from next-20220223 ?
config NFSD_V2_ACL
bool
depends on NFSD
config NFSD_V3_ACL
bool "NFS server support for the NFSv3 ACL protocol extension"
depends on NFSD
select NFSD_V2_ACL
help
--
Chuck Lever
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: linux-next: Tree for Feb 22 (NFSD_V2_ACL)
2022-02-24 15:08 ` Chuck Lever III
@ 2022-02-24 16:37 ` Randy Dunlap
2022-02-24 16:45 ` Chuck Lever III
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Randy Dunlap @ 2022-02-24 16:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Chuck Lever III
Cc: broonie@kernel.org, Linux Next Mailing List,
Linux Kernel Mailing List, Andrew Morton,
Linux FS-devel Mailing List, Linux NFS Mailing List
On 2/24/22 07:08, Chuck Lever III wrote:
>
>
>> On Feb 24, 2022, at 1:45 AM, Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On 2/23/22 07:58, Chuck Lever III wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Feb 23, 2022, at 1:08 AM, Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On 2/22/22 17:41, broonie@kernel.org wrote:
>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>
>>>>> Note that today's -next does not include the akpm tree since it's been a
>>>>> long day and the conflicts seemed more than it was wise for me to
>>>>> attempt at this point. I'll have another go tomorrow but no guarantees.
>>>>>
>>>>> Changes since 20220217:
>>>>
>>>> on x86_64:
>>>>
>>>> WARNING: unmet direct dependencies detected for NFSD_V2_ACL
>>>> Depends on [n]: NETWORK_FILESYSTEMS [=y] && NFSD [=n]
>>>> Selected by [y]:
>>>> - NFSD_V3_ACL [=y] && NETWORK_FILESYSTEMS [=y]
>>>
>>> Thanks, Randy. I think I've got it addressed in my for-next.
>>
>> Hi Chuck,
>>
>> I'm still seeing this in next-20220223...
>
> I tested my fixed version of the commit with the randconfig
> you attached to yesterday's email. Do you see this in
> fs/nfsd/Kconfig from next-20220223 ?
Not all of it -- it's missing one line:
> config NFSD_V2_ACL
> bool
> depends on NFSD
>
> config NFSD_V3_ACL
> bool "NFS server support for the NFSv3 ACL protocol extension"
> depends on NFSD <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<< HERE <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<
> select NFSD_V2_ACL
> help
When I add that, I no longer see the problem.
Thanks.
--
~Randy
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: linux-next: Tree for Feb 22 (NFSD_V2_ACL)
2022-02-24 16:37 ` Randy Dunlap
@ 2022-02-24 16:45 ` Chuck Lever III
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Chuck Lever III @ 2022-02-24 16:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Randy Dunlap
Cc: broonie@kernel.org, Linux Next Mailing List,
Linux Kernel Mailing List, Andrew Morton,
Linux FS-devel Mailing List, Linux NFS Mailing List
> On Feb 24, 2022, at 11:37 AM, Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org> wrote:
>
> On 2/24/22 07:08, Chuck Lever III wrote:
>>
>>
>>> On Feb 24, 2022, at 1:45 AM, Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 2/23/22 07:58, Chuck Lever III wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On Feb 23, 2022, at 1:08 AM, Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> On 2/22/22 17:41, broonie@kernel.org wrote:
>>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Note that today's -next does not include the akpm tree since it's been a
>>>>>> long day and the conflicts seemed more than it was wise for me to
>>>>>> attempt at this point. I'll have another go tomorrow but no guarantees.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Changes since 20220217:
>>>>>
>>>>> on x86_64:
>>>>>
>>>>> WARNING: unmet direct dependencies detected for NFSD_V2_ACL
>>>>> Depends on [n]: NETWORK_FILESYSTEMS [=y] && NFSD [=n]
>>>>> Selected by [y]:
>>>>> - NFSD_V3_ACL [=y] && NETWORK_FILESYSTEMS [=y]
>>>>
>>>> Thanks, Randy. I think I've got it addressed in my for-next.
>>>
>>> Hi Chuck,
>>>
>>> I'm still seeing this in next-20220223...
>>
>> I tested my fixed version of the commit with the randconfig
>> you attached to yesterday's email. Do you see this in
>> fs/nfsd/Kconfig from next-20220223 ?
>
> Not all of it -- it's missing one line:
>
>> config NFSD_V2_ACL
>> bool
>> depends on NFSD
>>
>> config NFSD_V3_ACL
>> bool "NFS server support for the NFSv3 ACL protocol extension"
>> depends on NFSD <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<< HERE <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<
>> select NFSD_V2_ACL
>> help
>
> When I add that, I no longer see the problem.
That's the fix. I guess next-20220223 hasn't pulled in my latest
for-next yet.
--
Chuck Lever
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2022-02-24 16:46 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <20220223014135.2764641-1-broonie@kernel.org>
2022-02-23 6:08 ` linux-next: Tree for Feb 22 (NFSD_V2_ACL) Randy Dunlap
2022-02-23 15:58 ` Chuck Lever III
2022-02-24 6:45 ` Randy Dunlap
2022-02-24 15:08 ` Chuck Lever III
2022-02-24 16:37 ` Randy Dunlap
2022-02-24 16:45 ` Chuck Lever III
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).