* Re: linux-next: Tree for Feb 22 (NFSD_V2_ACL) [not found] <20220223014135.2764641-1-broonie@kernel.org> @ 2022-02-23 6:08 ` Randy Dunlap 2022-02-23 15:58 ` Chuck Lever III 0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread From: Randy Dunlap @ 2022-02-23 6:08 UTC (permalink / raw) To: broonie, Linux Next Mailing List Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, akpm, Linux FS-devel Mailing List, Chuck Lever, linux-nfs [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 554 bytes --] On 2/22/22 17:41, broonie@kernel.org wrote: > Hi all, > > Note that today's -next does not include the akpm tree since it's been a > long day and the conflicts seemed more than it was wise for me to > attempt at this point. I'll have another go tomorrow but no guarantees. > > Changes since 20220217: > on x86_64: WARNING: unmet direct dependencies detected for NFSD_V2_ACL Depends on [n]: NETWORK_FILESYSTEMS [=y] && NFSD [=n] Selected by [y]: - NFSD_V3_ACL [=y] && NETWORK_FILESYSTEMS [=y] Full randconfig file is attached. -- ~Randy [-- Attachment #2: config-r2276.gz --] [-- Type: application/gzip, Size: 31481 bytes --] ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: linux-next: Tree for Feb 22 (NFSD_V2_ACL) 2022-02-23 6:08 ` linux-next: Tree for Feb 22 (NFSD_V2_ACL) Randy Dunlap @ 2022-02-23 15:58 ` Chuck Lever III 2022-02-24 6:45 ` Randy Dunlap 0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread From: Chuck Lever III @ 2022-02-23 15:58 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Randy Dunlap Cc: broonie@kernel.org, Linux Next Mailing List, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Andrew Morton, Linux FS-devel Mailing List, Linux NFS Mailing List > On Feb 23, 2022, at 1:08 AM, Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org> wrote: > > On 2/22/22 17:41, broonie@kernel.org wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> Note that today's -next does not include the akpm tree since it's been a >> long day and the conflicts seemed more than it was wise for me to >> attempt at this point. I'll have another go tomorrow but no guarantees. >> >> Changes since 20220217: > > on x86_64: > > WARNING: unmet direct dependencies detected for NFSD_V2_ACL > Depends on [n]: NETWORK_FILESYSTEMS [=y] && NFSD [=n] > Selected by [y]: > - NFSD_V3_ACL [=y] && NETWORK_FILESYSTEMS [=y] Thanks, Randy. I think I've got it addressed in my for-next. -- Chuck Lever ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: linux-next: Tree for Feb 22 (NFSD_V2_ACL) 2022-02-23 15:58 ` Chuck Lever III @ 2022-02-24 6:45 ` Randy Dunlap 2022-02-24 15:08 ` Chuck Lever III 0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread From: Randy Dunlap @ 2022-02-24 6:45 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Chuck Lever III Cc: broonie@kernel.org, Linux Next Mailing List, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Andrew Morton, Linux FS-devel Mailing List, Linux NFS Mailing List On 2/23/22 07:58, Chuck Lever III wrote: > >> On Feb 23, 2022, at 1:08 AM, Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org> wrote: >> >> On 2/22/22 17:41, broonie@kernel.org wrote: >>> Hi all, >>> >>> Note that today's -next does not include the akpm tree since it's been a >>> long day and the conflicts seemed more than it was wise for me to >>> attempt at this point. I'll have another go tomorrow but no guarantees. >>> >>> Changes since 20220217: >> >> on x86_64: >> >> WARNING: unmet direct dependencies detected for NFSD_V2_ACL >> Depends on [n]: NETWORK_FILESYSTEMS [=y] && NFSD [=n] >> Selected by [y]: >> - NFSD_V3_ACL [=y] && NETWORK_FILESYSTEMS [=y] > > Thanks, Randy. I think I've got it addressed in my for-next. Hi Chuck, I'm still seeing this in next-20220223... -- ~Randy ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: linux-next: Tree for Feb 22 (NFSD_V2_ACL) 2022-02-24 6:45 ` Randy Dunlap @ 2022-02-24 15:08 ` Chuck Lever III 2022-02-24 16:37 ` Randy Dunlap 0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread From: Chuck Lever III @ 2022-02-24 15:08 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Randy Dunlap Cc: broonie@kernel.org, Linux Next Mailing List, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Andrew Morton, Linux FS-devel Mailing List, Linux NFS Mailing List > On Feb 24, 2022, at 1:45 AM, Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org> wrote: > > > > On 2/23/22 07:58, Chuck Lever III wrote: >> >>> On Feb 23, 2022, at 1:08 AM, Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org> wrote: >>> >>> On 2/22/22 17:41, broonie@kernel.org wrote: >>>> Hi all, >>>> >>>> Note that today's -next does not include the akpm tree since it's been a >>>> long day and the conflicts seemed more than it was wise for me to >>>> attempt at this point. I'll have another go tomorrow but no guarantees. >>>> >>>> Changes since 20220217: >>> >>> on x86_64: >>> >>> WARNING: unmet direct dependencies detected for NFSD_V2_ACL >>> Depends on [n]: NETWORK_FILESYSTEMS [=y] && NFSD [=n] >>> Selected by [y]: >>> - NFSD_V3_ACL [=y] && NETWORK_FILESYSTEMS [=y] >> >> Thanks, Randy. I think I've got it addressed in my for-next. > > Hi Chuck, > > I'm still seeing this in next-20220223... I tested my fixed version of the commit with the randconfig you attached to yesterday's email. Do you see this in fs/nfsd/Kconfig from next-20220223 ? config NFSD_V2_ACL bool depends on NFSD config NFSD_V3_ACL bool "NFS server support for the NFSv3 ACL protocol extension" depends on NFSD select NFSD_V2_ACL help -- Chuck Lever ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: linux-next: Tree for Feb 22 (NFSD_V2_ACL) 2022-02-24 15:08 ` Chuck Lever III @ 2022-02-24 16:37 ` Randy Dunlap 2022-02-24 16:45 ` Chuck Lever III 0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread From: Randy Dunlap @ 2022-02-24 16:37 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Chuck Lever III Cc: broonie@kernel.org, Linux Next Mailing List, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Andrew Morton, Linux FS-devel Mailing List, Linux NFS Mailing List On 2/24/22 07:08, Chuck Lever III wrote: > > >> On Feb 24, 2022, at 1:45 AM, Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org> wrote: >> >> >> >> On 2/23/22 07:58, Chuck Lever III wrote: >>> >>>> On Feb 23, 2022, at 1:08 AM, Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org> wrote: >>>> >>>> On 2/22/22 17:41, broonie@kernel.org wrote: >>>>> Hi all, >>>>> >>>>> Note that today's -next does not include the akpm tree since it's been a >>>>> long day and the conflicts seemed more than it was wise for me to >>>>> attempt at this point. I'll have another go tomorrow but no guarantees. >>>>> >>>>> Changes since 20220217: >>>> >>>> on x86_64: >>>> >>>> WARNING: unmet direct dependencies detected for NFSD_V2_ACL >>>> Depends on [n]: NETWORK_FILESYSTEMS [=y] && NFSD [=n] >>>> Selected by [y]: >>>> - NFSD_V3_ACL [=y] && NETWORK_FILESYSTEMS [=y] >>> >>> Thanks, Randy. I think I've got it addressed in my for-next. >> >> Hi Chuck, >> >> I'm still seeing this in next-20220223... > > I tested my fixed version of the commit with the randconfig > you attached to yesterday's email. Do you see this in > fs/nfsd/Kconfig from next-20220223 ? Not all of it -- it's missing one line: > config NFSD_V2_ACL > bool > depends on NFSD > > config NFSD_V3_ACL > bool "NFS server support for the NFSv3 ACL protocol extension" > depends on NFSD <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<< HERE <<<<<<<<<<<<<<< > select NFSD_V2_ACL > help When I add that, I no longer see the problem. Thanks. -- ~Randy ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: linux-next: Tree for Feb 22 (NFSD_V2_ACL) 2022-02-24 16:37 ` Randy Dunlap @ 2022-02-24 16:45 ` Chuck Lever III 0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread From: Chuck Lever III @ 2022-02-24 16:45 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Randy Dunlap Cc: broonie@kernel.org, Linux Next Mailing List, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Andrew Morton, Linux FS-devel Mailing List, Linux NFS Mailing List > On Feb 24, 2022, at 11:37 AM, Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org> wrote: > > On 2/24/22 07:08, Chuck Lever III wrote: >> >> >>> On Feb 24, 2022, at 1:45 AM, Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org> wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>> On 2/23/22 07:58, Chuck Lever III wrote: >>>> >>>>> On Feb 23, 2022, at 1:08 AM, Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> On 2/22/22 17:41, broonie@kernel.org wrote: >>>>>> Hi all, >>>>>> >>>>>> Note that today's -next does not include the akpm tree since it's been a >>>>>> long day and the conflicts seemed more than it was wise for me to >>>>>> attempt at this point. I'll have another go tomorrow but no guarantees. >>>>>> >>>>>> Changes since 20220217: >>>>> >>>>> on x86_64: >>>>> >>>>> WARNING: unmet direct dependencies detected for NFSD_V2_ACL >>>>> Depends on [n]: NETWORK_FILESYSTEMS [=y] && NFSD [=n] >>>>> Selected by [y]: >>>>> - NFSD_V3_ACL [=y] && NETWORK_FILESYSTEMS [=y] >>>> >>>> Thanks, Randy. I think I've got it addressed in my for-next. >>> >>> Hi Chuck, >>> >>> I'm still seeing this in next-20220223... >> >> I tested my fixed version of the commit with the randconfig >> you attached to yesterday's email. Do you see this in >> fs/nfsd/Kconfig from next-20220223 ? > > Not all of it -- it's missing one line: > >> config NFSD_V2_ACL >> bool >> depends on NFSD >> >> config NFSD_V3_ACL >> bool "NFS server support for the NFSv3 ACL protocol extension" >> depends on NFSD <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<< HERE <<<<<<<<<<<<<<< >> select NFSD_V2_ACL >> help > > When I add that, I no longer see the problem. That's the fix. I guess next-20220223 hasn't pulled in my latest for-next yet. -- Chuck Lever ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2022-02-24 16:46 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <20220223014135.2764641-1-broonie@kernel.org>
2022-02-23 6:08 ` linux-next: Tree for Feb 22 (NFSD_V2_ACL) Randy Dunlap
2022-02-23 15:58 ` Chuck Lever III
2022-02-24 6:45 ` Randy Dunlap
2022-02-24 15:08 ` Chuck Lever III
2022-02-24 16:37 ` Randy Dunlap
2022-02-24 16:45 ` Chuck Lever III
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).