From: "David Hildenbrand (Arm)" <david@kernel.org>
To: Jinjiang Tu <tujinjiang@huawei.com>,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, ziy@nvidia.com, luizcap@redhat.com,
willy@infradead.org, linmiaohe@huawei.com,
svetly.todorov@memverge.com, xu.xin16@zte.com.cn,
chengming.zhou@linux.dev, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-mm@kvack.org
Cc: wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com, sunnanyong@huawei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] fs: stable_page_flags(): use folio_test_*() helpers
Date: Thu, 2 Jul 2026 14:03:09 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <61157b05-b22a-4bcf-942b-05225837b57b@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260702110614.2176986-1-tujinjiang@huawei.com>
On 7/2/26 13:06, Jinjiang Tu wrote:
> This series cleans up stable_page_flags(), removing the remaining direct
> flag manipulation and replacing with folio helpers.
>
> Patch 1 replaces the "1 << KPF_*" expressions with BIT_ULL() marco, to
> avoid -Wshift-count-overflow warning for KPF_* values larger than 32.
>
> Patch 2 replaces direct accesses to folio->flags.f with the standard
> folio_test_*() helper functions, which cleans up stable_page_flags() and
> hides internal implementation details.
>
> This series is based on [1].
>
> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260629033122.774318-1-tujinjiang@huawei.com/
You should explain the history a bit, and why we converted to the manual checks
in the first place.
Now that we take a folio+page snapshot, the values cannot change concurrently
anymore.
--
Cheers,
David
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-02 12:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-02 11:06 [PATCH 0/2] fs: stable_page_flags(): use folio_test_*() helpers Jinjiang Tu
2026-07-02 11:06 ` [PATCH 1/2] fs: stable_page_flags(): use BIT_ULL() for KPF flags Jinjiang Tu
2026-07-02 13:10 ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-07-02 14:32 ` [PATCH 1/2] " Zi Yan
2026-07-02 11:06 ` [PATCH 2/2] fs: stable_page_flags(): use folio_test_*() helpers Jinjiang Tu
2026-07-10 3:52 ` Jinjiang Tu
2026-07-10 11:29 ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-07-02 12:03 ` David Hildenbrand (Arm) [this message]
2026-07-03 3:00 ` [PATCH 0/2] " Jinjiang Tu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=61157b05-b22a-4bcf-942b-05225837b57b@kernel.org \
--to=david@kernel.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=chengming.zhou@linux.dev \
--cc=linmiaohe@huawei.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=luizcap@redhat.com \
--cc=sunnanyong@huawei.com \
--cc=svetly.todorov@memverge.com \
--cc=tujinjiang@huawei.com \
--cc=wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
--cc=xu.xin16@zte.com.cn \
--cc=ziy@nvidia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox