From: John Hubbard <jhubbard@nvidia.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>, Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Cc: <john.hubbard@gmail.com>, Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>,
Christopher Lameter <cl@linux.com>,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>, <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-rdma <linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
Jerome Glisse <jglisse@redhat.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
Ralph Campbell <rcampbell@nvidia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/3] mm: introduce put_user_page*(), placeholder versions
Date: Tue, 9 Oct 2018 17:32:16 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <62492f47-d51f-5c41-628c-ff17de21829e@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20181009162012.c662ef0b041993557e150035@linux-foundation.org>
On 10/9/18 4:20 PM, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Tue, 9 Oct 2018 10:30:25 +0200 Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> wrote:
>
>>> Also, maintainability. What happens if someone now uses put_page() by
>>> mistake? Kernel fails in some mysterious fashion? How can we prevent
>>> this from occurring as code evolves? Is there a cheap way of detecting
>>> this bug at runtime?
>>
>> The same will happen as with any other reference counting bug - the special
>> user reference will leak. It will be pretty hard to debug I agree. I was
>> thinking about whether we could provide some type safety against such bugs
>> such as get_user_pages() not returning struct page pointers but rather some
>> other special type but it would result in a big amount of additional churn
>> as we'd have to propagate this different type e.g. through the IO path so
>> that IO completion routines could properly call put_user_pages(). So I'm
>> not sure it's really worth it.
>
> I'm not really understanding. Patch 3/3 changes just one infiniband
> driver to use put_user_page(). But the changelogs here imply (to me)
> that every user of get_user_pages() needs to be converted to
> s/put_page/put_user_page/.
>
> Methinks a bit more explanation is needed in these changelogs?
>
OK, yes, it does sound like the explanation is falling short. I'll work on something
clearer. Did the proposed steps in the changelogs, such as:
[2] https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180709080554.21931-1-jhubbard@nvidia.com
Proposed steps for fixing get_user_pages() + DMA problems.
help at all, or is it just too many references, and I should write the words
directly in the changelog?
Anyway, patch 3/3 is a just a working example (which we do want to submit, though), and
many more conversions will follow. But they don't have to be done all upfront--they
can be done in follow up patchsets.
The put_user_page*() routines are, at this point, not going to significantly change
behavior.
I'm working on an RFC that will show what the long-term fix to get_user_pages and
put_user_pages will look like. But meanwhile it's good to get started on converting
all of the call sites.
thanks,
--
John Hubbard
NVIDIA
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-10-10 0:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-10-08 21:16 [PATCH v4 0/3] get_user_pages*() and RDMA: first steps john.hubbard
2018-10-08 21:16 ` [PATCH v4 1/3] mm: get_user_pages: consolidate error handling john.hubbard
2018-10-09 0:05 ` Andrew Morton
2018-10-08 21:16 ` [PATCH v4 2/3] mm: introduce put_user_page*(), placeholder versions john.hubbard
2018-10-09 0:14 ` Andrew Morton
2018-10-09 8:30 ` Jan Kara
2018-10-09 23:20 ` Andrew Morton
2018-10-10 0:32 ` John Hubbard [this message]
2018-10-10 23:43 ` Andrew Morton
2018-10-10 0:42 ` John Hubbard
2018-10-10 8:59 ` Jan Kara
2018-10-10 23:23 ` John Hubbard
2018-10-11 8:42 ` Jan Kara
2018-10-10 23:45 ` Andrew Morton
2018-10-11 8:49 ` Jan Kara
2018-10-11 13:20 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2018-10-12 1:23 ` John Hubbard
2018-10-12 3:53 ` John Hubbard
2018-10-18 10:19 ` Jan Kara
2018-11-05 7:25 ` John Hubbard
2018-10-22 19:43 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2018-11-05 7:17 ` John Hubbard
2018-11-05 8:37 ` Jan Kara
2018-10-08 21:16 ` [PATCH v4 3/3] infiniband/mm: convert put_page() to put_user_page*() john.hubbard
2018-10-09 9:52 ` kbuild test robot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=62492f47-d51f-5c41-628c-ff17de21829e@nvidia.com \
--to=jhubbard@nvidia.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=cl@linux.com \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=jgg@ziepe.ca \
--cc=jglisse@redhat.com \
--cc=john.hubbard@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
--cc=rcampbell@nvidia.com \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).