From: "xuyang2018.jy@fujitsu.com" <xuyang2018.jy@fujitsu.com>
To: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
Cc: "linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
"ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org" <ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org>,
"viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk" <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
"david@fromorbit.com" <david@fromorbit.com>,
"djwong@kernel.org" <djwong@kernel.org>,
"willy@infradead.org" <willy@infradead.org>,
"jlayton@kernel.org" <jlayton@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 4/4] ceph: Remove S_ISGID stripping code in ceph_finish_async_create
Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2022 08:43:59 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <6267BF2E.70504@fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220426071413.75mgcayybdb3cwgw@wittgenstein>
on 2022/4/26 15:14, Christian Brauner wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 26, 2022 at 12:19:52PM +0800, Yang Xu wrote:
>> Previous patches moved sgid stripping exclusively into the vfs. So
>> manual sgid stripping by the filesystem isn't needed anymore.
>>
>> Reviewed-by: Xiubo Li<xiubli@redhat.com>
>> Reviewed-by: Christian Brauner (Microsoft)<brauner@kernel.org>
>> Signed-off-by: Yang Xu<xuyang2018.jy@fujitsu.com>
>> ---
>
> Since this is a very sensitive patch series I think we need to be
> annoyingly pedantic about the commit messages. This is really only
> necessary because of the nature of these changes so you'll forgive me
> for being really annoying about this. Here's what I'd change the commit
> messages to:
>
> ceph: rely on vfs for setgid stripping
>
> Now that we finished moving setgid stripping for regular files in setgid
> directories into the vfs, individual filesystem don't need to manually
> strip the setgid bit anymore. Drop the now unneeded code from ceph.
This seems better, thanks.
>
>
>> fs/ceph/file.c | 4 ----
>> 1 file changed, 4 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/fs/ceph/file.c b/fs/ceph/file.c
>> index 6c9e837aa1d3..8e3b99853333 100644
>> --- a/fs/ceph/file.c
>> +++ b/fs/ceph/file.c
>> @@ -651,10 +651,6 @@ static int ceph_finish_async_create(struct inode *dir, struct dentry *dentry,
>> /* Directories always inherit the setgid bit. */
>> if (S_ISDIR(mode))
>> mode |= S_ISGID;
>
> (Frankly, this ideally shouldn't be necessary as well, i.e. it'd be
> great if that part would've been done by the vfs already too but it's
> not as security sensitive as setgid stripping for regular files.)
Maybe we can just add mode_add_sgid api into vfs_prepare_mode in the
future or only just add mode_add_sgid into do_mkdirat?
static inline umode_t vfs_prepare_mode(struct user_namespace *mnt_userns,
const struct inode *dir, umode_t mode)
{
mode = mode_strip_sgid(mnt_userns, dir, mode);
if (!IS_POSIXACL(dir))
mode &= ~current_umask();
mode = mode_add_sgid(dir, mode)
return mode;
}
fs/inode.c
umodet mode_add_sgid(const struct inode *dir, umode_t mode)
{
if (dir && dir->i_mode & S_ISGID && S_ISDIR(mode))
mode |= S_ISGID;
return mode;
}
Then we can remove "mode |= S_ISGID" code in inode_init_owner after we
check all places called inode_init_owner.
But now, let's finished S_ISGID stripping patchset firstly.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-04-26 9:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-04-26 4:19 [PATCH v7 1/4] fs: move sgid stripping operation from inode_init_owner into mode_strip_sgid Yang Xu
2022-04-26 4:19 ` [PATCH v7 2/4] fs: Add missing umask strip in vfs_tmpfile Yang Xu
2022-04-26 4:19 ` [PATCH v7 3/4] fs: strip file's S_ISGID mode on vfs instead of on underlying filesystem Yang Xu
2022-04-26 5:21 ` Darrick J. Wong
2022-04-26 8:34 ` Christian Brauner
2022-04-26 4:19 ` [PATCH v7 4/4] ceph: Remove S_ISGID stripping code in ceph_finish_async_create Yang Xu
2022-04-26 7:14 ` Christian Brauner
2022-04-26 8:43 ` xuyang2018.jy [this message]
2022-04-26 7:06 ` [PATCH v7 1/4] fs: move sgid stripping operation from inode_init_owner into mode_strip_sgid Christian Brauner
2022-04-26 7:39 ` xuyang2018.jy
2022-04-26 8:39 ` Christian Brauner
2022-04-26 9:22 ` xuyang2018.jy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=6267BF2E.70504@fujitsu.com \
--to=xuyang2018.jy@fujitsu.com \
--cc=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=djwong@kernel.org \
--cc=jlayton@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).