From: CGEL <cgel.zte@gmail.com>
To: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, corbet@lwn.net,
xu xin <xu.xin16@zte.com.cn>, Yang Yang <yang.yang29@zte.com.cn>,
Ran Xiaokai <ran.xiaokai@zte.com.cn>,
wangyong <wang.yong12@zte.com.cn>,
Yunkai Zhang <zhang.yunkai@zte.com.cn>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6] mm/ksm: introduce ksm_force for each process
Date: Fri, 13 May 2022 06:50:31 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <627dffb8.1c69fb81.2daf.2c76@mx.google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Yn12/ZMyQEnSh0Ge@casper.infradead.org>
On Thu, May 12, 2022 at 10:07:09PM +0100, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Tue, May 10, 2022 at 12:22:42PM +0000, cgel.zte@gmail.com wrote:
> > +++ b/Documentation/admin-guide/mm/ksm.rst
> > @@ -32,7 +32,7 @@ are swapped back in: ksmd must rediscover their identity and merge again).
> > Controlling KSM with madvise
> > ============================
> >
> > -KSM only operates on those areas of address space which an application
> > +KSM can operates on those areas of address space which an application
>
> "can operate on"
>
Thanks.
> > + * Force anonymous pages of this mm to be involved in KSM merging
> > + * without explicitly calling madvise.
> > + */
> > + if (!test_bit(MMF_VM_MERGEABLE, &mm->flags))
> > + err = __ksm_enter(mm);
> > + if (!err)
> > + mm->ksm_force = force;
> > + }
> > +
> > + mmap_write_unlock(mm);
> > + }
>
> There's a much simpler patch hiding inside this complicated one.
>
> if (force) {
> set_bit(MMF_VM_MERGEABLE, &mm->flags));
> for each VMA
> set VM_MERGEABLE;
> err = __ksm_enter(mm);
> } else {
> clear_bit(MMF_VM_MERGEABLE, &mm->flags));
> for each VMA
> clear VM_MERGEABLE;
> }
>
> ... and all the extra complications you added go away.
Sorry, but I don't think that is a better way of implementation, although it
is simpler. It overrides the intention of code ifself which is
unrecoverable. For example, if a program which madvise just a part of VMAs
(not all) as MERGEABLE then its ksm_force is turned on, and subsequently
it ksm_force is turned off again, the "madvised MERGEBLE" cannot be
recoverd.
===========================================================================
I have a idea: can we refer to the interface of THP? Substitute ksm_force
with ksm_enabled and give three values to it:
1) always: force all anonymous VMAs of this process to be scanned.
2) madvise: the default state, unless user code call madvise, don't
scan this process.
3) never: never be involed in KSM.
===========================================================================
How about this?
prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-05-13 6:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-05-10 12:22 [PATCH v6] mm/ksm: introduce ksm_force for each process cgel.zte
2022-05-10 13:30 ` Oleksandr Natalenko
2022-05-11 3:12 ` CGEL
2022-05-12 22:37 ` Andrew Morton
2022-05-13 9:51 ` Oleksandr Natalenko
2022-05-13 20:32 ` Andrew Morton
2022-05-13 20:53 ` Oleksandr Natalenko
2022-05-12 21:07 ` Matthew Wilcox
2022-05-13 6:50 ` CGEL [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=627dffb8.1c69fb81.2daf.2c76@mx.google.com \
--to=cgel.zte@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=ran.xiaokai@zte.com.cn \
--cc=wang.yong12@zte.com.cn \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
--cc=xu.xin16@zte.com.cn \
--cc=yang.yang29@zte.com.cn \
--cc=zhang.yunkai@zte.com.cn \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).