From: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
To: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net>, akpm@linux-foundation.org
Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Davidlohr Bueso <dbueso@suse.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fs/proc: introduce /proc/stat2 file
Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2018 17:01:32 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <65a3a4b8-bb7b-5cb2-3f50-af4b2717f81d@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20181029192521.23059-1-dave@stgolabs.net>
On 10/29/2018 03:25 PM, Davidlohr Bueso wrote:
> A recent report from a large database vendor which I shall not name
> shows concerns about poor performance when consuming /proc/stat info.
> Particularly kstat_irq() pops up in the profiles and most time is
> being spent there. The overall system is under a lot of irqs and
> almost 1k cores, thus this comes to little surprise.
>
> Granted that procfs in general is not known for its performance,
> nor designed for it, for that matter. Some users, however may be able
> to overcome this performance limitation, some not. Therefore it isn't
> bad having a kernel option for users that don't want any hard irq info
> -- and care enough about this.
>
> This patch introduces a new /proc/stat2 file that is identical to the
> regular 'stat' except that it zeroes all hard irq statistics. The new
> file is a drop in replacement to stat for users that need performance.
>
> The stat file is not touched, of course -- this was also previously
> suggested by Waiman:
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/1524166562-5644-1-git-send-email-longman@redhat.com/
>
> Signed-off-by: Davidlohr Bueso <dbueso@suse.de>
> ---
> Documentation/filesystems/proc.txt | 12 +++++++---
> fs/proc/stat.c | 45 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
> 2 files changed, 47 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/filesystems/proc.txt b/Documentation/filesystems/proc.txt
> index 12a5e6e693b6..563b01decb1e 100644
> --- a/Documentation/filesystems/proc.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/filesystems/proc.txt
> @@ -27,7 +27,7 @@ Table of Contents
> 1.5 SCSI info
> 1.6 Parallel port info in /proc/parport
> 1.7 TTY info in /proc/tty
> - 1.8 Miscellaneous kernel statistics in /proc/stat
> + 1.8 Miscellaneous kernel statistics in /proc/stat and /proc/stat2
> 1.9 Ext4 file system parameters
>
> 2 Modifying System Parameters
> @@ -140,6 +140,7 @@ Table 1-1: Process specific entries in /proc
> mem Memory held by this process
> root Link to the root directory of this process
> stat Process status
> + stat2 Process status without irq information
> statm Process memory status information
> status Process status in human readable form
> wchan Present with CONFIG_KALLSYMS=y: it shows the kernel function
> @@ -1301,8 +1302,8 @@ To see which tty's are currently in use, you can simply look into the file
> unknown /dev/tty 4 1-63 console
>
>
> -1.8 Miscellaneous kernel statistics in /proc/stat
> --------------------------------------------------
> +1.8 Miscellaneous kernel statistics in /proc/stat and /proc/stat2
> +-----------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Various pieces of information about kernel activity are available in the
> /proc/stat file. All of the numbers reported in this file are aggregates
> @@ -1371,6 +1372,11 @@ of the possible system softirqs. The first column is the total of all
> softirqs serviced; each subsequent column is the total for that particular
> softirq.
>
> +The stat2 file acts as a performance alternative to /proc/stat for workloads
A "performant alternative", right?
-Longman
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-10-30 5:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-10-29 19:25 [PATCH] fs/proc: introduce /proc/stat2 file Davidlohr Bueso
2018-10-29 19:35 ` Waiman Long
2018-10-29 20:00 ` Davidlohr Bueso
2018-10-29 20:29 ` Waiman Long
2018-10-29 20:38 ` Davidlohr Bueso
2018-10-29 20:59 ` Waiman Long
2018-10-29 21:23 ` Vito Caputo
2018-10-29 21:35 ` Waiman Long
2018-10-29 22:41 ` Vito Caputo
2018-10-30 18:57 ` Davidlohr Bueso
2018-10-30 22:40 ` Vito Caputo
2018-10-30 23:15 ` Davidlohr Bueso
2018-10-29 21:01 ` Waiman Long [this message]
2018-10-29 23:04 ` Daniel Colascione
2018-10-30 0:58 ` Vito Caputo
2018-11-06 23:48 ` Andrew Morton
2018-11-07 3:32 ` Davidlohr Bueso
2018-11-07 16:31 ` Waiman Long
2018-11-07 10:03 ` Miklos Szeredi
2018-11-07 15:42 ` Daniel Colascione
2018-11-07 15:54 ` Miklos Szeredi
2018-11-07 16:01 ` Daniel Colascione
2018-11-07 20:32 ` Vito Caputo
2018-11-08 2:07 ` Dave Chinner
2018-11-08 7:24 ` Davidlohr Bueso
2018-11-08 7:44 ` Davidlohr Bueso
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=65a3a4b8-bb7b-5cb2-3f50-af4b2717f81d@redhat.com \
--to=longman@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=dave@stgolabs.net \
--cc=dbueso@suse.de \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).