From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "J. R. Okajima" Subject: Re: [PATCH] fs: Work around NFS wreckage Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2011 10:30:44 +0900 Message-ID: <6610.1294968644@jrobl> References: <8952.1294927845@jrobl> <20110113151736.GW24920@pengutronix.de> Cc: Thomas Gleixner , Nick Piggin , LKML , Linus Torvalds , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, "Ramirez Luna, Omar" To: Uwe =?iso-8859-1?Q?Kleine-K=F6nig?= Return-path: Received: from mtoichi14.ns.itscom.net ([219.110.2.184]:58676 "EHLO mtoichi14.ns.itscom.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752034Ab1ANBbz (ORCPT ); Thu, 13 Jan 2011 20:31:55 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20110113151736.GW24920@pengutronix.de> Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Uwe Kleine-Knig: > > With this patch, can you unmount it cleanly? > > It skips incrementing d_count for both dentries. > > Do we need at least one? > If you tell me how to test that, I volunteer to try. > Something involving pivot_root? For example, # mount host:/dir /nfs # chroot /nfs # umount /nfs It is ok if /nfs is empty. J. R. Okajima