* [RESEND PATCH 5.10] fs/proc: do_task_stat: use __for_each_thread()
@ 2025-07-10 12:35 Heyne, Maximilian
2025-07-10 13:09 ` Greg KH
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Heyne, Maximilian @ 2025-07-10 12:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
Cc: Heyne, Maximilian, Harshit Mogalapalli, Oleg Nesterov,
Eric W. Biederman, Andrew Morton, stable@vger.kernel.org,
Alexey Dobriyan, Sauerwein, David, Sasha Levin,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
[ Upstream commit 7904e53ed5a20fc678c01d5d1b07ec486425bb6a ]
do/while_each_thread should be avoided when possible.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230909164501.GA11581@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Cc: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Stable-dep-of: 7601df8031fd ("fs/proc: do_task_stat: use sig->stats_lock to gather the threads/children stats")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
[mheyne: adjusted context]
Signed-off-by: Maximilian Heyne <mheyne@amazon.de>
---
Compile-tested only.
We're seeing soft lock-ups with 5.10.237 because of the backport of
commit 4fe85bdaabd6 ("fs/proc: do_task_stat: use sig->stats_lock to
gather the threads/children stats").
---
fs/proc/array.c | 6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/proc/array.c b/fs/proc/array.c
index 8fba6d39e776..77b94c04e4af 100644
--- a/fs/proc/array.c
+++ b/fs/proc/array.c
@@ -512,18 +512,18 @@ static int do_task_stat(struct seq_file *m, struct pid_namespace *ns,
cgtime = sig->cgtime;
if (whole) {
- struct task_struct *t = task;
+ struct task_struct *t;
min_flt = sig->min_flt;
maj_flt = sig->maj_flt;
gtime = sig->gtime;
rcu_read_lock();
- do {
+ __for_each_thread(sig, t) {
min_flt += t->min_flt;
maj_flt += t->maj_flt;
gtime += task_gtime(t);
- } while_each_thread(task, t);
+ }
rcu_read_unlock();
thread_group_cputime_adjusted(task, &utime, &stime);
--
2.47.1
Amazon Web Services Development Center Germany GmbH
Tamara-Danz-Str. 13
10243 Berlin
Geschaeftsfuehrung: Christian Schlaeger, Jonathan Weiss
Eingetragen am Amtsgericht Charlottenburg unter HRB 257764 B
Sitz: Berlin
Ust-ID: DE 365 538 597
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [RESEND PATCH 5.10] fs/proc: do_task_stat: use __for_each_thread()
2025-07-10 12:35 [RESEND PATCH 5.10] fs/proc: do_task_stat: use __for_each_thread() Heyne, Maximilian
@ 2025-07-10 13:09 ` Greg KH
2025-07-10 13:59 ` Harshit Mogalapalli
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Greg KH @ 2025-07-10 13:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Heyne, Maximilian
Cc: Harshit Mogalapalli, Oleg Nesterov, Eric W. Biederman,
Andrew Morton, stable@vger.kernel.org, Alexey Dobriyan,
Sauerwein, David, Sasha Levin, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
On Thu, Jul 10, 2025 at 12:35:43PM +0000, Heyne, Maximilian wrote:
> From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
>
> [ Upstream commit 7904e53ed5a20fc678c01d5d1b07ec486425bb6a ]
>
> do/while_each_thread should be avoided when possible.
>
> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230909164501.GA11581@redhat.com
> Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
> Cc: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com>
> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
> Stable-dep-of: 7601df8031fd ("fs/proc: do_task_stat: use sig->stats_lock to gather the threads/children stats")
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> [mheyne: adjusted context]
> Signed-off-by: Maximilian Heyne <mheyne@amazon.de>
> ---
>
> Compile-tested only.
> We're seeing soft lock-ups with 5.10.237 because of the backport of
> commit 4fe85bdaabd6 ("fs/proc: do_task_stat: use sig->stats_lock to
> gather the threads/children stats").
And this fixes it?
How?
>
> ---
> fs/proc/array.c | 6 +++---
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/proc/array.c b/fs/proc/array.c
> index 8fba6d39e776..77b94c04e4af 100644
> --- a/fs/proc/array.c
> +++ b/fs/proc/array.c
> @@ -512,18 +512,18 @@ static int do_task_stat(struct seq_file *m, struct pid_namespace *ns,
> cgtime = sig->cgtime;
>
> if (whole) {
> - struct task_struct *t = task;
> + struct task_struct *t;
>
> min_flt = sig->min_flt;
> maj_flt = sig->maj_flt;
> gtime = sig->gtime;
>
> rcu_read_lock();
> - do {
> + __for_each_thread(sig, t) {
> min_flt += t->min_flt;
> maj_flt += t->maj_flt;
> gtime += task_gtime(t);
> - } while_each_thread(task, t);
> + }
Ideally, the code generated here should be identical as before, so why
is this change needed?
confused,
greg k-h
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [RESEND PATCH 5.10] fs/proc: do_task_stat: use __for_each_thread()
2025-07-10 13:09 ` Greg KH
@ 2025-07-10 13:59 ` Harshit Mogalapalli
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Harshit Mogalapalli @ 2025-07-10 13:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg KH, Heyne, Maximilian
Cc: Oleg Nesterov, Eric W. Biederman, Andrew Morton,
stable@vger.kernel.org, Alexey Dobriyan, Sauerwein, David,
Sasha Levin, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Hi Greg,
On 10/07/25 18:39, Greg KH wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 10, 2025 at 12:35:43PM +0000, Heyne, Maximilian wrote:
>> From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
>>
>> [ Upstream commit 7904e53ed5a20fc678c01d5d1b07ec486425bb6a ]
>>
>> do/while_each_thread should be avoided when possible.
>>
>> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230909164501.GA11581@redhat.com
>> Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
>> Cc: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
>> Stable-dep-of: 7601df8031fd ("fs/proc: do_task_stat: use sig->stats_lock to gather the threads/children stats")
>> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
>> [mheyne: adjusted context]
>> Signed-off-by: Maximilian Heyne <mheyne@amazon.de>
>> ---
>>
>> Compile-tested only.
>> We're seeing soft lock-ups with 5.10.237 because of the backport of
>> commit 4fe85bdaabd6 ("fs/proc: do_task_stat: use sig->stats_lock to
>> gather the threads/children stats").
>
> And this fixes it?
>
Our testing also showed that after the backport of this commit(on 5.15.y
based release), we don't see the soft lockup anymore.
> How?
I think __for_each_thread() is safe whereas while_each_thread() is not safe.
This thread
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20131202152437.GA10896@redhat.com/ explains
why while_each_thread() is unsafe.
Thanks,
Harshit
>
>>
>> ---
>> fs/proc/array.c | 6 +++---
>> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/fs/proc/array.c b/fs/proc/array.c
>> index 8fba6d39e776..77b94c04e4af 100644
>> --- a/fs/proc/array.c
>> +++ b/fs/proc/array.c
>> @@ -512,18 +512,18 @@ static int do_task_stat(struct seq_file *m, struct pid_namespace *ns,
>> cgtime = sig->cgtime;
>>
>> if (whole) {
>> - struct task_struct *t = task;
>> + struct task_struct *t;
>>
>> min_flt = sig->min_flt;
>> maj_flt = sig->maj_flt;
>> gtime = sig->gtime;
>>
>> rcu_read_lock();
>> - do {
>> + __for_each_thread(sig, t) {
>> min_flt += t->min_flt;
>> maj_flt += t->maj_flt;
>> gtime += task_gtime(t);
>> - } while_each_thread(task, t);
>> + }
>
> Ideally, the code generated here should be identical as before, so why
> is this change needed?
> > confused,>
> greg k-h
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2025-07-10 13:59 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2025-07-10 12:35 [RESEND PATCH 5.10] fs/proc: do_task_stat: use __for_each_thread() Heyne, Maximilian
2025-07-10 13:09 ` Greg KH
2025-07-10 13:59 ` Harshit Mogalapalli
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).