From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-fsdevel-owner@kernel.org>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on
	aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org
Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18])
	by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5019CC54EE9
	for <linux-fsdevel@archiver.kernel.org>; Fri,  9 Sep 2022 01:46:40 +0000 (UTC)
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
        id S229999AbiIIBqj (ORCPT
        <rfc822;linux-fsdevel@archiver.kernel.org>);
        Thu, 8 Sep 2022 21:46:39 -0400
Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:59034 "EHLO
        lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
        with ESMTP id S229791AbiIIBqf (ORCPT
        <rfc822;linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>);
        Thu, 8 Sep 2022 21:46:35 -0400
Received: from szxga08-in.huawei.com (szxga08-in.huawei.com [45.249.212.255])
        by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5BB0DC2F81;
        Thu,  8 Sep 2022 18:46:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dggpemm500021.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.30.72.54])
        by szxga08-in.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4MNzJR72FVz14QWw;
        Fri,  9 Sep 2022 09:42:31 +0800 (CST)
Received: from dggpemm500001.china.huawei.com (7.185.36.107) by
 dggpemm500021.china.huawei.com (7.185.36.109) with Microsoft SMTP Server
 (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id
 15.1.2375.24; Fri, 9 Sep 2022 09:46:22 +0800
Received: from [10.174.177.243] (10.174.177.243) by
 dggpemm500001.china.huawei.com (7.185.36.107) with Microsoft SMTP Server
 (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id
 15.1.2375.24; Fri, 9 Sep 2022 09:46:21 +0800
Message-ID: <679d8f0c-f8cc-d43e-5467-c32a78bcb850@huawei.com>
Date:   Fri, 9 Sep 2022 09:46:21 +0800
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/91.9.1
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched: Move numa_balancing sysctls to its own file
Content-Language: en-US
To:     Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@kernel.org>
CC:     Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
        Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
        Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
        Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
        Iurii Zaikin <yzaikin@google.com>,
        <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>
References: <20220908072531.87916-1-wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com>
 <YxqDa+WALRr8L7Q8@bombadil.infradead.org>
From:   Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com>
In-Reply-To: <YxqDa+WALRr8L7Q8@bombadil.infradead.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Originating-IP: [10.174.177.243]
X-ClientProxiedBy: dggems701-chm.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.178) To
 dggpemm500001.china.huawei.com (7.185.36.107)
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org


On 2022/9/9 8:06, Luis Chamberlain wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 08, 2022 at 03:25:31PM +0800, Kefeng Wang wrote:
>> The sysctl_numa_balancing_promote_rate_limit and sysctl_numa_balancing
>> are part of sched, move them to its own file.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com>
> There is quite a bit of random cleanup on each kernel release
> for sysctls to do things like what you just did. Because of this it has its
> own tree to help avoid conflicts. Can you base your patches on the
> sysctl-testing branch here and re-submit:

Found this when reading memory tiering code，sure to re-submit based your 
branch,

thanks.

>
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mcgrof/linux.git/log/?h=sysctl-testing
>
> If testing goes fine, then I'd move this to sysctl-next which linux-next
> picks up for yet more testing.
>
> Are scheduling folks OK with this patch and me picking it up on the
> sysctl-next tree if all tests are a go?
>
>    Luis
> .