From: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
To: Xie Yongji <xieyongji@bytedance.com>,
mst@redhat.com, stefanha@redhat.com, sgarzare@redhat.com,
parav@nvidia.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
rdunlap@infradead.org, willy@infradead.org,
viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, axboe@kernel.dk, bcrl@kvack.org,
corbet@lwn.net
Cc: virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-aio@kvack.org,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [RFC v2 09/13] vduse: Add support for processing vhost iotlb message
Date: Wed, 23 Dec 2020 17:05:21 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <6818a214-d587-4f0b-7de6-13c4e7e94ab6@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201222145221.711-10-xieyongji@bytedance.com>
On 2020/12/22 下午10:52, Xie Yongji wrote:
> To support vhost-vdpa bus driver, we need a way to share the
> vhost-vdpa backend process's memory with the userspace VDUSE process.
>
> This patch tries to make use of the vhost iotlb message to achieve
> that. We will get the shm file from the iotlb message and pass it
> to the userspace VDUSE process.
>
> Signed-off-by: Xie Yongji <xieyongji@bytedance.com>
> ---
> Documentation/driver-api/vduse.rst | 15 +++-
> drivers/vdpa/vdpa_user/vduse_dev.c | 147 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> include/uapi/linux/vduse.h | 11 +++
> 3 files changed, 171 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/driver-api/vduse.rst b/Documentation/driver-api/vduse.rst
> index 623f7b040ccf..48e4b1ba353f 100644
> --- a/Documentation/driver-api/vduse.rst
> +++ b/Documentation/driver-api/vduse.rst
> @@ -46,13 +46,26 @@ The following types of messages are provided by the VDUSE framework now:
>
> - VDUSE_GET_CONFIG: Read from device specific configuration space
>
> +- VDUSE_UPDATE_IOTLB: Update the memory mapping in device IOTLB
> +
> +- VDUSE_INVALIDATE_IOTLB: Invalidate the memory mapping in device IOTLB
> +
> Please see include/linux/vdpa.h for details.
>
> -In the data path, VDUSE framework implements a MMU-based on-chip IOMMU
> +The data path of userspace vDPA device is implemented in different ways
> +depending on the vdpa bus to which it is attached.
> +
> +In virtio-vdpa case, VDUSE framework implements a MMU-based on-chip IOMMU
> driver which supports mapping the kernel dma buffer to a userspace iova
> region dynamically. The userspace iova region can be created by passing
> the userspace vDPA device fd to mmap(2).
>
> +In vhost-vdpa case, the dma buffer is reside in a userspace memory region
> +which will be shared to the VDUSE userspace processs via the file
> +descriptor in VDUSE_UPDATE_IOTLB message. And the corresponding address
> +mapping (IOVA of dma buffer <-> VA of the memory region) is also included
> +in this message.
> +
> Besides, the eventfd mechanism is used to trigger interrupt callbacks and
> receive virtqueue kicks in userspace. The following ioctls on the userspace
> vDPA device fd are provided to support that:
> diff --git a/drivers/vdpa/vdpa_user/vduse_dev.c b/drivers/vdpa/vdpa_user/vduse_dev.c
> index b974333ed4e9..d24aaacb6008 100644
> --- a/drivers/vdpa/vdpa_user/vduse_dev.c
> +++ b/drivers/vdpa/vdpa_user/vduse_dev.c
> @@ -34,6 +34,7 @@
>
> struct vduse_dev_msg {
> struct vduse_dev_request req;
> + struct file *iotlb_file;
> struct vduse_dev_response resp;
> struct list_head list;
> wait_queue_head_t waitq;
> @@ -325,12 +326,80 @@ static int vduse_dev_set_vq_state(struct vduse_dev *dev,
> return ret;
> }
>
> +static int vduse_dev_update_iotlb(struct vduse_dev *dev, struct file *file,
> + u64 offset, u64 iova, u64 size, u8 perm)
> +{
> + struct vduse_dev_msg *msg;
> + int ret;
> +
> + if (!size)
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + msg = vduse_dev_new_msg(dev, VDUSE_UPDATE_IOTLB);
> + msg->req.size = sizeof(struct vduse_iotlb);
> + msg->req.iotlb.offset = offset;
> + msg->req.iotlb.iova = iova;
> + msg->req.iotlb.size = size;
> + msg->req.iotlb.perm = perm;
> + msg->req.iotlb.fd = -1;
> + msg->iotlb_file = get_file(file);
> +
> + ret = vduse_dev_msg_sync(dev, msg);
My feeling is that we should provide consistent API for the userspace
device to use.
E.g we'd better carry the IOTLB message for both virtio/vhost drivers.
It looks to me for virtio drivers we can still use UPDAT_IOTLB message
by using VDUSE file as msg->iotlb_file here.
> + vduse_dev_msg_put(msg);
> + fput(file);
> +
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> +static int vduse_dev_invalidate_iotlb(struct vduse_dev *dev,
> + u64 iova, u64 size)
> +{
> + struct vduse_dev_msg *msg;
> + int ret;
> +
> + if (!size)
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + msg = vduse_dev_new_msg(dev, VDUSE_INVALIDATE_IOTLB);
> + msg->req.size = sizeof(struct vduse_iotlb);
> + msg->req.iotlb.iova = iova;
> + msg->req.iotlb.size = size;
> +
> + ret = vduse_dev_msg_sync(dev, msg);
> + vduse_dev_msg_put(msg);
> +
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> +static unsigned int perm_to_file_flags(u8 perm)
> +{
> + unsigned int flags = 0;
> +
> + switch (perm) {
> + case VHOST_ACCESS_WO:
> + flags |= O_WRONLY;
> + break;
> + case VHOST_ACCESS_RO:
> + flags |= O_RDONLY;
> + break;
> + case VHOST_ACCESS_RW:
> + flags |= O_RDWR;
> + break;
> + default:
> + WARN(1, "invalidate vhost IOTLB permission\n");
> + break;
> + }
> +
> + return flags;
> +}
> +
> static ssize_t vduse_dev_read_iter(struct kiocb *iocb, struct iov_iter *to)
> {
> struct file *file = iocb->ki_filp;
> struct vduse_dev *dev = file->private_data;
> struct vduse_dev_msg *msg;
> - int size = sizeof(struct vduse_dev_request);
> + unsigned int flags;
> + int fd, size = sizeof(struct vduse_dev_request);
> ssize_t ret = 0;
>
> if (iov_iter_count(to) < size)
> @@ -349,6 +418,18 @@ static ssize_t vduse_dev_read_iter(struct kiocb *iocb, struct iov_iter *to)
> if (ret)
> return ret;
> }
> +
> + if (msg->req.type == VDUSE_UPDATE_IOTLB && msg->req.iotlb.fd == -1) {
> + flags = perm_to_file_flags(msg->req.iotlb.perm);
> + fd = get_unused_fd_flags(flags);
> + if (fd < 0) {
> + vduse_dev_enqueue_msg(dev, msg, &dev->send_list);
> + return fd;
> + }
> + fd_install(fd, get_file(msg->iotlb_file));
> + msg->req.iotlb.fd = fd;
> + }
> +
> ret = copy_to_iter(&msg->req, size, to);
> if (ret != size) {
> vduse_dev_enqueue_msg(dev, msg, &dev->send_list);
> @@ -565,6 +646,69 @@ static void vduse_vdpa_set_config(struct vdpa_device *vdpa, unsigned int offset,
> vduse_dev_set_config(dev, offset, buf, len);
> }
>
> +static void vduse_vdpa_invalidate_iotlb(struct vduse_dev *dev,
> + struct vhost_iotlb_msg *msg)
> +{
> + vduse_dev_invalidate_iotlb(dev, msg->iova, msg->size);
> +}
> +
> +static int vduse_vdpa_update_iotlb(struct vduse_dev *dev,
> + struct vhost_iotlb_msg *msg)
> +{
> + u64 uaddr = msg->uaddr;
> + u64 iova = msg->iova;
> + u64 size = msg->size;
> + u64 offset;
> + struct vm_area_struct *vma;
> + int ret;
> +
> + while (uaddr < msg->uaddr + msg->size) {
> + vma = find_vma(current->mm, uaddr);
> + ret = -EINVAL;
> + if (!vma)
> + goto err;
> +
> + size = min(msg->size, vma->vm_end - uaddr);
> + offset = (vma->vm_pgoff << PAGE_SHIFT) + uaddr - vma->vm_start;
> + if (vma->vm_file && (vma->vm_flags & VM_SHARED)) {
> + ret = vduse_dev_update_iotlb(dev, vma->vm_file, offset,
> + iova, size, msg->perm);
> + if (ret)
> + goto err;
My understanding is that vma is something that should not be known by a
device. So I suggest to move the above processing to vhost-vdpa.c.
Thanks
> + }
> + iova += size;
> + uaddr += size;
> + }
> + return 0;
> +err:
> + vduse_dev_invalidate_iotlb(dev, msg->iova, iova - msg->iova);
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> +static int vduse_vdpa_process_iotlb_msg(struct vdpa_device *vdpa,
> + struct vhost_iotlb_msg *msg)
> +{
> + struct vduse_dev *dev = vdpa_to_vduse(vdpa);
> + int ret = 0;
> +
> + switch (msg->type) {
> + case VHOST_IOTLB_UPDATE:
> + ret = vduse_vdpa_update_iotlb(dev, msg);
> + break;
> + case VHOST_IOTLB_INVALIDATE:
> + vduse_vdpa_invalidate_iotlb(dev, msg);
> + break;
> + case VHOST_IOTLB_BATCH_BEGIN:
> + case VHOST_IOTLB_BATCH_END:
> + break;
> + default:
> + ret = -EINVAL;
> + break;
> + }
> +
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> static void vduse_vdpa_free(struct vdpa_device *vdpa)
> {
> struct vduse_dev *dev = vdpa_to_vduse(vdpa);
> @@ -597,6 +741,7 @@ static const struct vdpa_config_ops vduse_vdpa_config_ops = {
> .set_status = vduse_vdpa_set_status,
> .get_config = vduse_vdpa_get_config,
> .set_config = vduse_vdpa_set_config,
> + .process_iotlb_msg = vduse_vdpa_process_iotlb_msg,
> .free = vduse_vdpa_free,
> };
>
> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/vduse.h b/include/uapi/linux/vduse.h
> index 873305dfd93f..c5080851f140 100644
> --- a/include/uapi/linux/vduse.h
> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/vduse.h
> @@ -21,6 +21,8 @@ enum vduse_req_type {
> VDUSE_GET_STATUS,
> VDUSE_SET_CONFIG,
> VDUSE_GET_CONFIG,
> + VDUSE_UPDATE_IOTLB,
> + VDUSE_INVALIDATE_IOTLB,
> };
>
> struct vduse_vq_num {
> @@ -51,6 +53,14 @@ struct vduse_dev_config_data {
> __u8 data[VDUSE_CONFIG_DATA_LEN];
> };
>
> +struct vduse_iotlb {
> + __u32 fd;
> + __u64 offset;
> + __u64 iova;
> + __u64 size;
> + __u8 perm;
> +};
> +
> struct vduse_dev_request {
> __u32 type; /* request type */
> __u32 unique; /* request id */
> @@ -62,6 +72,7 @@ struct vduse_dev_request {
> struct vduse_vq_ready vq_ready; /* virtqueue ready status */
> struct vduse_vq_state vq_state; /* virtqueue state */
> struct vduse_dev_config_data config; /* virtio device config space */
> + struct vduse_iotlb iotlb; /* iotlb message */
> __u64 features; /* virtio features */
> __u8 status; /* device status */
> };
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-12-23 9:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 55+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-12-22 14:52 [RFC v2 00/13] Introduce VDUSE - vDPA Device in Userspace Xie Yongji
2020-12-22 14:52 ` [RFC v2 01/13] mm: export zap_page_range() for driver use Xie Yongji
2020-12-22 15:44 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-12-22 14:52 ` [RFC v2 02/13] eventfd: track eventfd_signal() recursion depth separately in different cases Xie Yongji
2020-12-22 14:52 ` [RFC v2 03/13] eventfd: Increase the recursion depth of eventfd_signal() Xie Yongji
2020-12-22 14:52 ` [RFC v2 04/13] vdpa: Remove the restriction that only supports virtio-net devices Xie Yongji
2020-12-22 14:52 ` [RFC v2 05/13] vdpa: Pass the netlink attributes to ops.dev_add() Xie Yongji
2020-12-22 14:52 ` [RFC v2 06/13] vduse: Introduce VDUSE - vDPA Device in Userspace Xie Yongji
2020-12-23 8:08 ` Jason Wang
2020-12-23 14:17 ` Yongji Xie
2020-12-24 3:01 ` Jason Wang
2020-12-24 8:34 ` Yongji Xie
2020-12-25 6:59 ` Jason Wang
2021-01-08 13:32 ` Bob Liu
2021-01-10 10:03 ` Yongji Xie
2020-12-22 14:52 ` [RFC v2 07/13] vduse: support get/set virtqueue state Xie Yongji
2020-12-22 14:52 ` [RFC v2 08/13] vdpa: Introduce process_iotlb_msg() in vdpa_config_ops Xie Yongji
2020-12-23 8:36 ` Jason Wang
2020-12-23 11:06 ` Yongji Xie
2020-12-24 2:36 ` Jason Wang
2020-12-24 7:24 ` Yongji Xie
2020-12-22 14:52 ` [RFC v2 09/13] vduse: Add support for processing vhost iotlb message Xie Yongji
2020-12-23 9:05 ` Jason Wang [this message]
2020-12-23 12:14 ` [External] " Yongji Xie
2020-12-24 2:41 ` Jason Wang
2020-12-24 7:37 ` Yongji Xie
2020-12-25 2:37 ` Yongji Xie
2020-12-25 7:02 ` Jason Wang
2020-12-25 11:36 ` Yongji Xie
2020-12-25 6:57 ` Jason Wang
2020-12-25 10:31 ` Yongji Xie
2020-12-28 7:43 ` Jason Wang
2020-12-28 8:14 ` Yongji Xie
2020-12-28 8:43 ` Jason Wang
2020-12-28 9:12 ` Yongji Xie
2020-12-29 9:11 ` Jason Wang
2020-12-29 10:26 ` Yongji Xie
2020-12-30 6:10 ` Jason Wang
2020-12-30 7:09 ` Yongji Xie
2020-12-30 8:41 ` Jason Wang
2020-12-30 10:12 ` Yongji Xie
2020-12-31 2:49 ` Jason Wang
2020-12-31 5:15 ` Yongji Xie
2020-12-31 5:49 ` Jason Wang
2020-12-31 6:52 ` Yongji Xie
2020-12-31 7:11 ` Jason Wang
2020-12-31 8:00 ` Yongji Xie
2020-12-22 14:52 ` [RFC v2 10/13] vduse: grab the module's references until there is no vduse device Xie Yongji
2020-12-22 14:52 ` [RFC v2 11/13] vduse/iova_domain: Support reclaiming bounce pages Xie Yongji
2020-12-22 14:52 ` [RFC v2 12/13] vduse: Add memory shrinker to reclaim " Xie Yongji
2020-12-22 14:52 ` [RFC v2 13/13] vduse: Introduce a workqueue for irq injection Xie Yongji
2020-12-23 6:38 ` [RFC v2 00/13] Introduce VDUSE - vDPA Device in Userspace Jason Wang
2020-12-23 8:14 ` Jason Wang
2020-12-23 10:59 ` Yongji Xie
2020-12-24 2:24 ` Jason Wang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=6818a214-d587-4f0b-7de6-13c4e7e94ab6@redhat.com \
--to=jasowang@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=bcrl@kvack.org \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-aio@kvack.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=parav@nvidia.com \
--cc=rdunlap@infradead.org \
--cc=sgarzare@redhat.com \
--cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
--cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
--cc=xieyongji@bytedance.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).