linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
To: Smita Koralahalli <Smita.KoralahalliChannabasappa@amd.com>,
	<linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	<nvdimm@lists.linux.dev>, <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Alison Schofield <alison.schofield@intel.com>,
	Vishal Verma <vishal.l.verma@intel.com>,
	Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@intel.com>,
	Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
	Jonathan Cameron <jonathan.cameron@huawei.com>,
	Yazen Ghannam <yazen.ghannam@amd.com>,
	Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@intel.com>,
	Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net>,
	Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>, Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>,
	"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
	Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>, Pavel Machek <pavel@kernel.org>,
	Li Ming <ming.li@zohomail.com>,
	Jeff Johnson <jeff.johnson@oss.qualcomm.com>,
	"Ying Huang" <huang.ying.caritas@gmail.com>,
	Yao Xingtao <yaoxt.fnst@fujitsu.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	Nathan Fontenot <nathan.fontenot@amd.com>,
	Terry Bowman <terry.bowman@amd.com>,
	Robert Richter <rrichter@amd.com>,
	Benjamin Cheatham <benjamin.cheatham@amd.com>,
	Zhijian Li <lizhijian@fujitsu.com>,
	"Borislav Petkov" <bp@alien8.de>,
	Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/9] dax/hmem, e820, resource: Defer Soft Reserved insertion until hmem is ready
Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2025 14:19:24 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <692f65ecb5603_261c110090@dwillia2-mobl4.notmuch> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251120031925.87762-2-Smita.KoralahalliChannabasappa@amd.com>

Smita Koralahalli wrote:
> From: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
> 
> Insert Soft Reserved memory into a dedicated soft_reserve_resource tree
> instead of the iomem_resource tree at boot. Delay publishing these ranges
> into the iomem hierarchy until ownership is resolved and the HMEM path
> is ready to consume them.
> 
> Publishing Soft Reserved ranges into iomem too early conflicts with CXL
> hotplug and prevents region assembly when those ranges overlap CXL
> windows.
> 
> Follow up patches will reinsert Soft Reserved ranges into iomem after CXL
> window publication is complete and HMEM is ready to claim the memory. This
> provides a cleaner handoff between EFI-defined memory ranges and CXL
> resource management without trimming or deleting resources later.

Please, when you modify a patch from an original, add your
Co-developed-by: and clarify what you changed.

> 
> Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Smita Koralahalli <Smita.KoralahalliChannabasappa@amd.com>
> ---
>  arch/x86/kernel/e820.c    |  2 +-
>  drivers/cxl/acpi.c        |  2 +-
>  drivers/dax/hmem/device.c |  4 +-
>  drivers/dax/hmem/hmem.c   |  7 ++-
>  include/linux/ioport.h    | 13 +++++-
>  kernel/resource.c         | 92 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
>  6 files changed, 100 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
> 
[..]
> @@ -426,6 +443,26 @@ int walk_iomem_res_desc(unsigned long desc, unsigned long flags, u64 start,
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(walk_iomem_res_desc);
>  
> +#ifdef CONFIG_EFI_SOFT_RESERVE
> +struct resource soft_reserve_resource = {
> +	.name	= "Soft Reserved",
> +	.start	= 0,
> +	.end	= -1,
> +	.desc	= IORES_DESC_SOFT_RESERVED,
> +	.flags	= IORESOURCE_MEM,
> +};
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(soft_reserve_resource);

It looks like one of the things you changed from my RFC was the addition
of walk_soft_reserve_res_desc() and region_intersects_soft_reserve().
With those APIs not only does this symbol not need to be exported, but
it also can be static / private to resource.c.

> +
> +int walk_soft_reserve_res_desc(unsigned long desc, unsigned long flags,
> +			       u64 start, u64 end, void *arg,
> +			       int (*func)(struct resource *, void *))
> +{
> +	return walk_res_desc(&soft_reserve_resource, start, end, flags, desc,
> +			     arg, func);
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(walk_soft_reserve_res_desc);
> +#endif
> +
>  /*
>   * This function calls the @func callback against all memory ranges of type
>   * System RAM which are marked as IORESOURCE_SYSTEM_RAM and IORESOUCE_BUSY.
> @@ -648,6 +685,22 @@ int region_intersects(resource_size_t start, size_t size, unsigned long flags,
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(region_intersects);
>  
> +#ifdef CONFIG_EFI_SOFT_RESERVE
> +int region_intersects_soft_reserve(resource_size_t start, size_t size,
> +				   unsigned long flags, unsigned long desc)
> +{
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	read_lock(&resource_lock);
> +	ret = __region_intersects(&soft_reserve_resource, start, size, flags,
> +				  desc);
> +	read_unlock(&resource_lock);
> +
> +	return ret;
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(region_intersects_soft_reserve);
> +#endif
> +
>  void __weak arch_remove_reservations(struct resource *avail)
>  {
>  }
> @@ -966,7 +1019,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(insert_resource);
>   * Insert a resource into the resource tree, possibly expanding it in order
>   * to make it encompass any conflicting resources.
>   */
> -void insert_resource_expand_to_fit(struct resource *root, struct resource *new)
> +void __insert_resource_expand_to_fit(struct resource *root, struct resource *new)
>  {
>  	if (new->parent)
>  		return;
> @@ -997,7 +1050,20 @@ void insert_resource_expand_to_fit(struct resource *root, struct resource *new)
>   * to use this interface. The former are built-in and only the latter,
>   * CXL, is a module.
>   */
> -EXPORT_SYMBOL_NS_GPL(insert_resource_expand_to_fit, "CXL");
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_NS_GPL(__insert_resource_expand_to_fit, "CXL");
> +
> +void insert_resource_expand_to_fit(struct resource *new)
> +{
> +	struct resource *root = &iomem_resource;
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_EFI_SOFT_RESERVE
> +	if (new->desc == IORES_DESC_SOFT_RESERVED)
> +		root = &soft_reserve_resource;
> +#endif

I can not say I am entirely happy with this change, I would prefer to
avoid ifdef in C, and I would prefer not to break the legacy semantics
of this function, but it meets the spirit of the original RFC without
introducing a new insert_resource_late(). I assume review feedback
requested this?

> +	__insert_resource_expand_to_fit(root, new);
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(insert_resource_expand_to_fit);

There are no consumers for this export, so it can be dropped.

  reply	other threads:[~2025-12-02 22:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-11-20  3:19 [PATCH v4 0/9] dax/hmem, cxl: Coordinate Soft Reserved handling with CXL and HMEM Smita Koralahalli
2025-11-20  3:19 ` [PATCH v4 1/9] dax/hmem, e820, resource: Defer Soft Reserved insertion until hmem is ready Smita Koralahalli
2025-12-02 22:19   ` dan.j.williams [this message]
2025-12-11 23:20     ` Koralahalli Channabasappa, Smita
2025-12-02 23:31   ` Dave Jiang
2025-11-20  3:19 ` [PATCH v4 2/9] dax/hmem: Request cxl_acpi and cxl_pci before walking Soft Reserved ranges Smita Koralahalli
2025-11-20  3:19 ` [PATCH v4 3/9] dax/hmem: Gate Soft Reserved deferral on DEV_DAX_CXL Smita Koralahalli
2025-12-02 23:32   ` Dave Jiang
2025-11-20  3:19 ` [PATCH v4 4/9] dax/hmem: Defer handling of Soft Reserved ranges that overlap CXL windows Smita Koralahalli
2025-12-02 22:37   ` dan.j.williams
2025-12-11 23:23     ` Koralahalli Channabasappa, Smita
2025-11-20  3:19 ` [PATCH v4 5/9] cxl/region, dax/hmem: Arbitrate Soft Reserved ownership with cxl_regions_fully_map() Smita Koralahalli
2025-12-03  3:50   ` dan.j.williams
2025-12-11 23:42     ` Koralahalli Channabasappa, Smita
2025-11-20  3:19 ` [PATCH v4 6/9] cxl/region: Add register_dax flag to defer DAX setup Smita Koralahalli
2025-11-20 18:17   ` Koralahalli Channabasappa, Smita
2025-11-20 20:21   ` kernel test robot
2025-12-04  0:22   ` dan.j.williams
2025-12-12 19:59     ` Koralahalli Channabasappa, Smita
2025-11-20  3:19 ` [PATCH v4 7/9] cxl/region, dax/hmem: Register cxl_dax only when CXL owns Soft Reserved span Smita Koralahalli
2025-11-20  3:19 ` [PATCH v4 8/9] cxl/region, dax/hmem: Tear down CXL regions when HMEM reclaims Soft Reserved Smita Koralahalli
2025-12-04  0:50   ` dan.j.williams
2025-12-12 22:12     ` Koralahalli Channabasappa, Smita
2025-11-20  3:19 ` [PATCH v4 9/9] dax/hmem: Reintroduce Soft Reserved ranges back into the iomem tree Smita Koralahalli
2025-12-04  0:54   ` dan.j.williams
2025-12-12 22:14     ` Koralahalli Channabasappa, Smita
2025-12-01 19:56 ` [PATCH v4 0/9] dax/hmem, cxl: Coordinate Soft Reserved handling with CXL and HMEM Alison Schofield
2025-12-03 13:35   ` Tomasz Wolski
2025-12-03 22:05     ` dan.j.williams
2025-12-05  2:54       ` Yasunori Gotou (Fujitsu)
2025-12-05 23:04         ` Tomasz Wolski
2025-12-06  0:11         ` dan.j.williams
2025-12-02  6:41 ` dan.j.williams

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=692f65ecb5603_261c110090@dwillia2-mobl4.notmuch \
    --to=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
    --cc=Smita.KoralahalliChannabasappa@amd.com \
    --cc=alison.schofield@intel.com \
    --cc=ardb@kernel.org \
    --cc=benjamin.cheatham@amd.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=dave.jiang@intel.com \
    --cc=dave@stgolabs.net \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=huang.ying.caritas@gmail.com \
    --cc=ira.weiny@intel.com \
    --cc=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=jeff.johnson@oss.qualcomm.com \
    --cc=jonathan.cameron@huawei.com \
    --cc=len.brown@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lizhijian@fujitsu.com \
    --cc=ming.li@zohomail.com \
    --cc=nathan.fontenot@amd.com \
    --cc=nvdimm@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=pavel@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rafael@kernel.org \
    --cc=rrichter@amd.com \
    --cc=terry.bowman@amd.com \
    --cc=vishal.l.verma@intel.com \
    --cc=willy@infradead.org \
    --cc=yaoxt.fnst@fujitsu.com \
    --cc=yazen.ghannam@amd.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).