From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Jared Hulbert" Subject: Re: [patch 4/6] xip: support non-struct page backed memory Date: Mon, 3 Mar 2008 11:38:35 -0800 Message-ID: <6934efce0803031138g725f0ec4ra683d56615b7dbe0@mail.gmail.com> References: <20080118045649.334391000@suse.de> <20080118045755.735923000@suse.de> <6934efce0803010014p2cc9a5edu5fee2029c0104a07@mail.gmail.com> <47CBB44D.7040203@de.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: carsteno@de.ibm.com, npiggin@suse.de, "Andrew Morton" , mschwid2@linux.vnet.ibm.com, heicars2@linux.vnet.ibm.com, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org To: "Linus Torvalds" Return-path: Received: from gv-out-0910.google.com ([216.239.58.191]:62501 "EHLO gv-out-0910.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751373AbYCCTij (ORCPT ); Mon, 3 Mar 2008 14:38:39 -0500 Received: by gv-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id s4so155056gve.37 for ; Mon, 03 Mar 2008 11:38:37 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: Content-Disposition: inline Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: > NO! > > "virt_to_phys()" is about kernel 1:1-mapped virtual addresses, and > "fixing" it would be totally wrong. By 1:1 you mean virtual + offset == physical + offset right?