From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Daniel Phillips Subject: Re: [RFC] Tux3 for review Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2014 17:31:49 -0700 Message-ID: <69617b30-fb3e-4c35-9106-8a88d7cbdd98@phunq.net> References: <20140613103216.GA4589@amd.pavel.ucw.cz> <02d3b094-808c-4b17-903d-1280d451704b@phunq.net> <20140613202039.GA23872@amd.pavel.ucw.cz> <1402932354.2197.61.camel@dabdike.int.hansenpartnership.com> <20140619082129.GA4309@xo-6d-61-c0.localdomain> <1403378941.2177.24.camel@dabdike.int.hansenpartnership.com> <20140622183450.GC5333@thunk.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Cc: James Bottomley , =?utf-8?B?THVrw6HFoSBDemVybmVy?= , Pavel Machek , Dave Chinner , , , Linus Torvalds , Andrew Morton To: Theodore Ts'o Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20140622183450.GC5333@thunk.org> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org On Sunday, June 22, 2014 11:34:50 AM PDT, Theodore Ts'o wrote: > On Sat, Jun 21, 2014 at 08:32:03PM -0700, Daniel Phillips wrote: >>> That's a bit disingenuous: the concern has always been how page forking >>> interacted with writeback. It's not new, it was one of the major things >>> brought up at LSF 14 months ago, so you weren't just assigned this. >> >> [citation needed] > > http://lwn.net/Articles/548091/ Thank you Ted, and also thank you for providing an example worth emulating of collegial behavior on LKML. Regards, Daniel